Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-2ktwh Total loading time: 0.254 Render date: 2021-04-15T15:05:56.481Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }
EnglishFrançais
Antiquity Antiquity

Article contents

Priority scores for archaeological evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Mark Bowden
Mark Bowden
Affiliation:
Royal Commission on the Historical Monuments of England, Line Building, Haymarket Lane, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU
Get access
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Extract

The new Monuments Protection Programme (Darvill et al. 1987; the November 1987 ANTIQUITY) will depend heavily on scoring systems to assess the relative value of different monuments and areas. Here are some comments by someone else with experience of scoring sites.

Type
Notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 62 , Issue 235 , June 1988 , pp. 286 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.
If you should have access and can't see this content please contact technical support.

References

Bowden, M.C.B. 1986. Salisbury bypass; archaeological implications. Wiltshire County Council Library and Museum Service. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Canham, R.A. & Chippindale, C.. In press. Managing for effective archaeological conservation: the example of Salisbury Plain military training area, England, Journal of Field Archaeology.Google Scholar
Darvill, T., Saunders, A. & Startin, B.. 1987. A question of national importance: approaches to the evaluation of ancient monuments for the Monuments Protection Programme in England, Antiquity 61: 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groube, L.M. 1978. Priorities and problems in Dorset archaeology, in Darvill, T. et al., New approaches to our past: 29–52. Southampton: University of Southampton Archaeological Society.Google Scholar
Groube, L.M. & Bowden, M.C.B.. 1982. The archaeology of rural Dorset: past, present and future. Dorchester: Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society. Monograph 4.Google Scholar
Nieke, M.R. 1987a. Callaly Moor field survey 1987 Newcastle upon Tyne: Archaeological Unit for the North East.Google Scholar
Nieke, M.R. 1987b. Callaly Moor field survey phase 2: autumn 1987. Newcastle upon Tyne: Archaeological Unit for the North East.Google Scholar
Richards, J. Forthcoming. Stonehenge environs survey.Google Scholar
RCHME. Forthcoming. The earthworks of south Wiltshire.Google Scholar
SPTAAWP. 1986. Salisbury Plain Training Area Archaeological Working Party report 1984–5. Bristol: PSA.Google Scholar
Topping, P. 1987. A ‘New’ Signal Station in Cumbria, Britannia 18: 298–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topping, P. Forthcoming. Early cultivation in Northumberland and the Borders, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 19 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 15th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Priority scores for archaeological evaluation
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Priority scores for archaeological evaluation
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Priority scores for archaeological evaluation
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *