Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-9dmbd Total loading time: 0.257 Render date: 2021-02-26T19:59:11.445Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }
EnglishFrançais
Antiquity Antiquity

Article contents

Butchering with small tools: the implications of the Evron Quarry assemblage for the behaviour of Homo erectus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Michael Chazan
Michael Chazan
Affiliation:
*Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, 19 Russell Street, Toronto, ONT M5S 2S2, Canada
Get access
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Stratified stone tools found with elephant and hippopotamus teeth at Evron Quarry can be dated to before 780 000 years ago. The assemblage includes handaxes, but less expectedly, small stone tools in the form of flakes with notches and points. Not thought to be points for spears or arrows, these small tools are suggested to be usable for butchery. They represent an adaption of local materials that make poor handaxes—so showing an ingenious improvisation on the part of Homo erectus.

Keywords

Levant Lower Palaeolithic Acheulean handaxe small tool
Type
Research Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 87 , Issue 336 , 1 June 2013 , pp. 350 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.
If you should have access and can't see this content please contact technical support.

References

Barkai, R., Lemorini, C. & Gopher, A.. 2010. Palaeolithic cutlery 400 000–200 000 years ago: tiny meat-cutting tools from Qesem Cave, Israel. Antiquity 84 (325) Project Gallery. Available at: http://www.antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/barkai325/ (accessed 21 January 2013).Google Scholar
Burdukiewicz, J.M. & Ronen, A.. 2003. Lower Palaeolithic small tools in Europe and the Levant. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Chazan, M., Monchot, H. & Kolska Horwitz, L.. 2007. Spatial analysis of lithic artifacts and fauna from Holon, in Chazan, M. & Kolska Horwitz, L. (ed.) Holon: a Lower Paleolithic site in Israel: 163-80. Cambridge (MA): Peabody Museum.Google Scholar
Chazan, M., Avery, D.M., Bamford, M.K., Berna, F., Brink, J., Fernandez-Jalvo, Y., Goldberg, P., Holt, S., Matmon, A., Porat, N., Ron, H., Rossouw, L., Scott, L. & Kolska Horwitz, L.. 2012. The Oldowan horizon in Wonderwerk Cave (South Africa): archaeological, geological, paleontological and paleoclimatic evidence. Journal of Human Evolution 63: 859-66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De La Torre, I. 2004. Omo revisited: evaluating the technological skills of Pliocene hominids. Current Anthropology 45: 439-65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diez-Martin, F., Sánchez, P., Domínguez-Rodrigo, M. & Mabulla, A.. 2009. Were Olduvai hominins making butchering tools or battering tools? Analysis of a recently excavated lithic assemblage from BK (Bed II, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania). Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 28: 274-89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, A., Hansen, P.V. & Rasmussen, P.. 1984. Macro and micro wear traces on lithic projectile points. Journal of Danish Archaeology 3: 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilead, D. & Israel, M.. 1975. An Early Paleolithic site at Kefar Menahem. Tel Aviv 2: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilead, D. & Ronen, A.. 1977. Acheulean industries from ‘Evron on the Western Coastal Plain. Eretz Israel 13: 56–86.Google Scholar
Haas, G. 1970. Metridiochoerus evronensis n. sp., a new Middle Pleistocene phacochoerid from Israel. Israel Journal of Zoology 19: 179-81.Google Scholar
Hutchins, K. 2011. Measuring use-related fracture velocity in lithic armatures to identify spears, javelins, darts and arrows. Journal of Archaeological Science 38: 1737-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issar, A. & Kafri, U.. 1969. The discovery of a Pleistocene mammalian fauna and artifacts at ‘Evron, Western Galilee. Israel Journal of Earth Sciences 18: 147.Google Scholar
Kuman, K. & Field, A.S.. 2009. The Oldowan industry from Sterkfontein Caves, South Africa, in Schick, K. & Toth, N. (ed.) The cutting edge: new approaches to the archaeology of human origins: 151-69. Gosport (IN): Stone Age Institute Press.Google Scholar
Mora, R. & De La Torre, I.. 2005. Percussion tools in Olduvai Beds I and II (Tanzania): implications for early human activities. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 24: 179-92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pargeter, J. 2011. Assessing the macrofracture method for identifying Stone Age hunting weaponry. Journal of Archaeological Science 38: 2882–88. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2011.04.01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porat, N. & Ronen, A.. 2002. Luminescence and ESR age determinations of the Lower Paleolithic site Evron Quarry, Israel. Advances in ESR Applications 18: 123-30.Google Scholar
Prausnitz, M.W. 1969. The sequence of Early to Middle Paleolithic flint industries along the Galilean Littoral. Israel Exploration Journal 19: 129-47.Google Scholar
Rink, W.J. 1997. Electron spin resonance (ESR) dating and ESR applications in Quaternary science and archaeometry. Radiation Measurements 27: 975–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ron, H., Porat, N., Ronen, A., Tchernov, E. & Kolska Horwitz, L.. 2003. Magnetostratigraphy of the Evron Member—implications for the age of the Middle Acheulian site of Evron Quarry. Journal of Human Evolution 44: 633-39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ronen, A. 1991. The Lower Paleolithic site Evron-Quarry in western Galilee, Israel. Sonderveröffentlichungen Geologisches Institut der Universität zu Köln 82: 187–212.Google Scholar
Ronen, A. 2003. The small tools of Evron-Quarry, western Galilee, Israel, in Burdukiewicz, J.M. & Ronen, A. (ed.) Lower Palaeolithic small tools in Europe and the Levant: 113-20. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Ronen, A. & Amiel, A.. 1974. The Evron Quarry: a contribution to the Quaternary stratigraphy of the coastal plain of Israel. Paléorient 2: 167-73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, K.D. & Toth, N.. 1993. Making silent stones speak: human evolution and the dawn of technology. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.Google Scholar
Sharon, G. 2009. Large flake Acheulian. Quaternary International 223-224: 226-33.Google Scholar
Sivan, D., Gvirtzman, G. & Sass, E.. 1999. Quaternary stratigraphy and paleogeography of the Galilee coastal plain, Israel. Quaternary Research 51: 280-94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steguweit, L. 2003. Gebrauchsspuren an Artefakten der Hominiden Fundstelle Bilzingsleben (Thüringen) (Tubinger Arbeiten zur Urgeschichte 2). Rahden: Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
Stekelis, M. 1950. Evron. Alon (Israel Department of Antiquities and Museums) 2: 29–30 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Tchernov, E., Kolska Horwitz, L., Ronen, A. & Lister, A.. 1994. The faunal remains from Evron Quarry in relation to other Lower Paleolithic hominid sites in the Southern Levant. Quaternary Research 42: 328-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thieme, H. 1997. Lower Palaeolithic hunting spears from Germany. Nature 385: 807-10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toro Moyano, I., De Lumley, H., Barrier, P., Barsky, D., Cauche, D., Celiberti, V., Gregoire, S., Lebegue, F., Mestour, B. & Moncel, M.-H.. 2010. Les industries lithiques archaïques de Barranco León et de Fuente Nueva 3: Orce, bassin de Gaudix-Baza, Andalousie. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J., Schoville, B.J., Brown, K.S. & Chazan, M.. 2012. Evidence for early hafted hunting technology. Science 338: 942-46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaidner, Y., Ronen, A. & Burdukiewicz, J.M.. 2003. L’industrie microlithique du Paléolithique inférieur de Bizat Ruhama, Israel. L’Anthropologie 107: 203-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaidner, Y., Yesurun, R. & Mallol, C.. 2010. Early Pleistocene hominins outside of Africa: recent excavations at Bizat Ruhama, Israel. PaleoAnthropology 2010: 162-75.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 164 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th February 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

11 Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Butchering with small tools: the implications of the Evron Quarry assemblage for the behaviour of Homo erectus
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Butchering with small tools: the implications of the Evron Quarry assemblage for the behaviour of Homo erectus
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Butchering with small tools: the implications of the Evron Quarry assemblage for the behaviour of Homo erectus
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *