Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-jsbx8 Total loading time: 0.504 Render date: 2021-04-18T00:34:15.880Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Hardness of Wet Snow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kaoru Izumi
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Hazards in Snowy Areas, Niigata University, Niigata, 950-21, Japan
Eizi Akitaya
Affiliation:
Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan 060
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dependence of Kinosita’s hardness R of wet snow on its dry density ρd and free water content W was obtained in the following form where a, b and c are constants. When wet snow was qualitatively classified into two types, I (coarse-grained granular) and II (new and fine-grained compact) and the constants were determined separately for each type, the correlation coefficients of the above relation were high except between In R and W for snow I. For further investigation of the effect of W on R, a dry snow sample was prepared and R was measured before and after water addition. Aging effect on R was also investigated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1985

INTRODUCTION

Hokuriku district in Japan has much snow, which is usually wet because of a relatively warm climate in winter. Hence, for such practical purposes as avalanche prevention and snow removal, it is important to study mechanical properties of wet snow. In this paper, Kinosita’s hardness of wet snow (Kinosita 1960) is discussed. This is defined as the average resistance per unit area offered by snow to vertical penetration of a metallic disk driven into the snow surface by a blow from a drop hammer.

HARDNESS MEASUREMENTS OF NATURAL WET SNOW

Kinosita’s hardness R, density p and free water content W of 208 natural wet snow samples were measured in the field in the winter of 1981-82. The free water content, measured with a newly designed calorimeter (Akitaya 1978), was less than 22% in weight except in two nearly-saturated samples.

Since hardness was supposed to depend mainly on the solid structure of snow, dry density ρd was calculated from free water content W and density ρ and used as a parameter in analysis of the obtained data. The wet snow samples were qualitatively classified into two types: I (coarse-grained granular snow) and II (new and fine-grained compact snow).

In Figure I, In R was plotted against ρd, where solid circles represent snow I and open circles snow II. Clearly, snow II is harder than snow I with the same dry density. Also In R seemed to increase linearly with increasing ρd for both types of snow. On the other hand, In R of fine-grained compact snow (snow II) was reported to decrease linearly with increasing W (Akitaya and Endo 1981). Hence, the dependence of R on W and ρd was assumed as

(1a)

and the constants a, b and c were obtained by multiple regression method for each snow type. The results are:

Plot of hardness (R) versus dry density (ρd) of natural wet snow.

(1b)
(1c)

where R is measured in Pa, W in % and ρd in kg/m3. The values of b and c of these relations are significant at less than 0.1% level. The correlation coefficients of these relations, shown in Table 1, are high except the partial correlation coefficient of In R and W with respect to ρd for snow I. The reason for this low correlation is probably that the dependence of R on W is strongly affected by ρd. Actually, we found that R of snow I with ρd larger than 500 kg/m3 was almost independent of W, while R of snow I with ρd smaller than 300 kg/m3 occasionally decreased by up to 90% when W was increased to saturation.

The relation (1c) with W = 0 agrees well the formula for dry snow reported by Kinosita (1960).

Table 1. Correlation Coefficients For In R = a - bW + cpd .

LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS

To study aging effect on hardness and also the difference of hardness between dry and wet snow of the same solid structure, we carried out the following experiments in a cold room. Samples were prepared at -10°C from natural snow by first disassembling it into grains with a sieve and then redepositing them. The samples will be hereafter termed “coarse-grained” and “fine-grained” according to origin (snow I and snow II). Mean density of nine coarse-grained samples (0.84 mm < grain size <2.83 mm) was 525 kg/m 3 while that of seven fine-grained samples (g.s. < 1 mm) was 425 kg/m 3. The prepared samples were allowed to sinter at -10°C for various time intervals before R was measured. Then they were soaked in water at 0°C for 10 seconds. After surplus water had been allowed to drain, hardness was measured at 1±1°C occasionally for up to several hours, during which the free water content was nearly constant (about 7% for coarse-grained and 28% for fine-grained samples).

Sintering effect in the dry state was obtained from

(2a)
(2b)

where R-5 is hardness normalized to -5°C (Tusima 1972) in Pa and t the sintering time in hour. Numerals in parentheses are the values of correlation coefficient.

Aging effect in wet state was also expressed by a similar form

(3)

where R-5 is hardness in Pa and t the lapse time after water supply in minutes. Here analyzed data were taken from each sample and we have as many sets of constants α and β as the number of samples. Values of α ranged from 10700 to 60900 and of β from 0.164 to 0.566. The value of the correlation coefficient ranged from 0.840 to 1.000.

Finally, the hardness of sample 1 minute after the addition of water (that is, α) is compared with R-5, the hardness just before water was added. In Figure 2, yR = In (α /R-5) was plotted against the sintering time t,

Change in hardness between before and immediately after the supply of water (yR) and sintering time before the supply of water (t).

which may be an indication of bond growth in dry state. It is clear that yR is strongly dependent on t and grain size.

References

Akitaya, E 1978 Measurements of free water content of wet snow by calorimetrie method. Low Temperature Science A 36: 103-111 Google Scholar
Akitaya, E, Endo, Y 1981 Characteristics of the snow cover in melting season in Hokkaido. Low Temperature Science A 40: 51-59 Google Scholar
Kinosita, S 1960 The hardness of snow I. Low Temperature Science Ser A 19: 119-134 Google Scholar
Tusima, K 1972 Hardness of snow as dependent on its temperature II. Low Temperature Science Ser A 30:47-52 Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 35
Total number of PDF views: 85 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th January 2017 - 18th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

You have Access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Hardness of Wet Snow
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Hardness of Wet Snow
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Hardness of Wet Snow
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *