Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Geospatial simulations of airborne ice-penetrating radar surveying reveal elevation under-measurement bias for ice-sheet bed topography

  • Oliver T. Bartlett (a1), Steven J. Palmer (a1), Dustin M. Schroeder (a2) (a3), Emma J. MacKie (a2), Timothy T. Barrows (a4) (a5) and Alastair G. C. Graham (a6)...

Abstract

Airborne radio-echo sounding (RES) surveys are widely used to measure ice-sheet bed topography. Measuring bed topography as accurately and widely as possible is of critical importance to modelling ice dynamics and hence to constraining better future ice response to climate change. Measurement accuracy of RES surveys is influenced both by the geometry of bed topography and the survey design. Here we develop a novel approach for simulating RES surveys over glaciated terrain, to quantify the sensitivity of derived bed elevation to topographic geometry. Furthermore, we investigate how measurement errors influence the quantification of glacial valley geometry. We find a negative bias across RES measurements, where off-nadir return measurement error is typically −1.8 ± 11.6 m. Topographic highlands are under-measured an order of magnitude more than lowlands. Consequently, valley depth and cross-sectional area are largely under-estimated. While overall estimates of ice thickness are likely too high, we find large glacier valley cross-sectional area to be under-estimated by −2.8 ± 18.1%. Therefore, estimates of ice flux through large outlet glaciers are likely too low when this effect is not taken into account. Additionally, bed mismeasurements potentially impact our appreciation of outlet-glacier stability.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Geospatial simulations of airborne ice-penetrating radar surveying reveal elevation under-measurement bias for ice-sheet bed topography
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Geospatial simulations of airborne ice-penetrating radar surveying reveal elevation under-measurement bias for ice-sheet bed topography
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Geospatial simulations of airborne ice-penetrating radar surveying reveal elevation under-measurement bias for ice-sheet bed topography
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Oliver T. Bartlett, E-mail: ob285@exeter.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Aschwanden, A, Fahnestock, MA and Truffer, M (2016) Complex Greenland outlet glacier flow captured. Nature Communications 7, 10524. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10524.
Bamber, JL and 10 others (2013) A new bed elevation dataset for Greenland. The Cryosphere 7(2), 499510. doi: 10.5194/tc-7-499-2013.
Bingham, RG and Siegert, MJ (2007) Radio-echo sounding over polar ice masses. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 12(1), 4762. doi: 10.2113/JEEG12.1.47.
Bingham, RG and Siegert, MJ (2009) Quantifying subglacial bed roughness in Antarctica: implications for ice-sheet dynamics and history. Quaternary Science Reviews 28(3–4), 223236. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2008.10.014.
Catania, GA and 7 others (2018) Geometric controls on tidewater glacier retreat in central western Greenland. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 123(8), 20242038. doi: 10.1029/2017JF004499.
Choi, Y, Morlighem, M, Rignot, E, Mouginot, J and Wood, M (2017) Modeling the response of Nioghalvfjerdsfjorden and Zachariae Isstrøm Glaciers, Greenland, to ocean forcing over the next century. Geophysical Research Letters 44(21), 11071. doi: 10.1002/2017GL075174.
Chu, W and 5 others (2016) Extensive winter subglacial water storage beneath the Greenland Ice Sheet. Geophysical Research Letters 43(24), 12484. doi: 10.1002/2016GL071538.
Church, JA and 13 others (2013) Sea level change. In Stocker, TF, Qin, D, Plattner, GK, Tignor, M, Allen, SK, Boschung, J, Nauels, A, Xia, Y, Bex, V and Midgley, PM eds. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 11371216. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.
Cooper, MA and 5 others (2019) Subglacial roughness of the Greenland Ice Sheet: relationship with contemporary ice velocity and geology. The Cryosphere 13(11), 30933115. doi: 10.5194/tc-13-3093-2019.
CReSIS (2018) CReSIS Radar Depth Sounder Data, Lawrence, Kansas, USA. Digital Media. http://data.cresis.ku.edu/.
Dowdeswell, JA and Evans, S (2004) Investigations of the form and flow of ice sheets and glaciers using radio-echo sounding. Reports on Progress in Physics 67(10), 1821. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/67/10/R03.
Durand, G, Gagliardini, O, Favier, L, Zwinger, T and Le Meur, E (2011) Impact of bedrock description on modeling ice sheet dynamics. Geophysical Research Letters 38(20), L20501. doi: doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048892.
Enderlin, EM and 5 others (2014) An improved mass budget for the Greenland ice sheet. Geophysical Research Letters 41(3), 866872. doi: 10.1002/2013GL059010.
Evans, S and Robin, GDQ (1966) Glacier depth-sounding from the air. Nature 210(5039), 883.
Eyles, N, Moreno, LA and Sookhan, S (2018) Ice streams of the Late Wisconsin Cordilleran Ice Sheet in western North America. Quaternary Science Reviews 179, 87122. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.10.027.
Gogineni, S and 9 others (2001) Coherent radar ice thickness measurements over the Greenland ice sheet. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 106(D24), 3376133772. doi: 0.1029/2001JD900183.
Gudmundsson, GH (1997) Basal-flow characteristics of a non-linear flow sliding frictionless over strongly undulating bedrock. Journal of Glaciology 43(143), 8089. doi: 10.3189/S0022143000002835.
Hoffman, MJ and 9 others (2016) Greenland subglacial drainage evolution regulated by weakly connected regions of the bed. Nature Communications, 7, 13903. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13903.
Jamieson, SS and 7 others (2014) The glacial geomorphology of the Antarctic ice sheet bed. Antarctic Science 26(6), 724741. doi: 10.1017/S0954102014000212.
Jezek, K, Wu, X, Paden, J and Leuschen, C (2013) Radar mapping of Isunnguata Sermia, Greenland. Journal of Glaciology 59(218), 11351146. doi: 10.3189/2013JoG12J248.
Jordan, TM and 6 others (2017) Self-affine subglacial roughness: consequences for radar scattering and basal water discrimination in northern Greenland. The Cryosphere 11(3), 1247. doi: 10.5194/tc-11-1247-2017.
Kendrick, AK and 10 others (2018) Surface meltwater impounded by seasonal englacial storage in West Greenland. Geophysical Research Letters 45(19), 10474. doi: 10.1029/2018GL079787.
King, MD and 6 others (2018) Seasonal to decadal variability in ice discharge from the Greenland ice sheet. The Cryosphere 12(12), 38133825. doi: 10.5194/tc-12-3813-2018.
Lapazaran, JJ, Otero, J, Martín-Español, A and Navarro, FJ (2016) On the errors involved in ice-thickness estimates I: ground-penetrating radar measurement errors. Journal of Glaciology 62(236), 10081020. doi: 10.1017/jog.2016.93.
Lindbäck, K and 8 others (2014) High-resolution ice thickness and bed topography of a land-terminating section of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Earth System Science Data 6(2), 331338. doi: 10.5194/essd-6-331-2014.
McMillan, M and 10 others (2014) Rapid dynamic activation of a marine-based Arctic ice cap. Geophysical Research Letters 41(24), 89028909. doi: 10.1002/2014GL062255.
Millan, R and 5 others (2018) Vulnerability of Southeast Greenland glaciers to warm Atlantic water from operation IceBridge and ocean melting Greenland data. Geophysical Research Letters 45, 26882696. doi: 10.1002/2017GL076561.
Morlighem, M and 31 others (2017) Bedmachine v3: complete bed topography and ocean bathymetry mapping of Greenland from multibeam echo sounding combined with mass conservation. Geophysical Research Letters 44(21), 11051. doi: 10.1002/2017GL074954.
Morlighem, M, Rignot, E, Mouginot, J, Seroussi, H and Larour, E (2014) Deeply incised submarine glacial valleys beneath the Greenland ice sheet. Nature Geoscience 7(6), 418. doi: 10.1038/NGEO2167.
Mouginot, J and 8 others (2019) Forty-six years of Greenland Ice Sheet mass balance from 1972 to 2018. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(19), 92399244. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1904242116.
Paden, J, Akins, T, Dunson, D, Allen, C and Gogineni, P (2010) Ice-sheet bed 3-D tomography. Journal of Glaciology 56(195), 311. doi: 10.3189/002214310791190811.
Porter, C and 28 others (2018) ‘ArcticDEM’. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OHHUKH, Harvard Dataverse, V1, [01/08/2018].
Rignot, E and Kanagaratnam, P (2006) Changes in the velocity structure of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Science (New York, N.Y.) 311(5763), 986990. doi: 10.1126/science.1121381.
Schroeder, DM and 7 others (2016) Assessing the potential for passive radio sounding of Europa and Ganymede with RIME and REASON. Planetary and Space Science 134, 5260. doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2016.10.007.
Schroeder, DM and 9 others (2020) Five decades of radioglaciology. Annals of Glaciology 113. doi: 10.1017/aog.2020.11.
Studinger, M, Koenig, L, Martin, S and Sonntag, J (2010, July). Operation icebridge: using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between Icesat and Icesat-2. 2010 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IEEE, pp. 19181919. doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2010.5650555.
Sugden, DE and John, BS (1976) Glaciers and Landscape: A Geomorphological Approach. London: E. Arnold.
Sundal, AV and 5 others (2009) Evolution of supra-glacial lakes across the Greenland Ice Sheet. Remote Sensing of Environment 113(10), 21642171. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.05.018.
Sundal, AV and 5 others (2011) Melt-induced speed-up of Greenland ice sheet offset by efficient subglacial drainage. Nature 469(7331), 521. doi: 10.1038/nature09740.
Turchetti, S, Dean, K, Naylor, S and Siegert, M (2008) Accidents and opportunities: a history of the radio echo-sounding of Antarctica, 1958–79. The British Journal for the History of Science 41(3), 417444. doi: 10.1017/S0007087408000903.
Van den Broeke, MR and 7 others (2016) On the recent contribution of the Greenland ice sheet to sea level change. The Cryosphere 10(5), 19331946. doi: 10.5194/tc-10-1933-2016.
van de Wal, RS and 6 others (2008) Large and rapid melt-induced velocity changes in the ablation zone of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Science 321(5885), 111113. doi: 10.1126/science.1158540.

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Bartlett et al. supplementary material
Tables S1-S3

 Word (47 KB)
47 KB

Geospatial simulations of airborne ice-penetrating radar surveying reveal elevation under-measurement bias for ice-sheet bed topography

  • Oliver T. Bartlett (a1), Steven J. Palmer (a1), Dustin M. Schroeder (a2) (a3), Emma J. MacKie (a2), Timothy T. Barrows (a4) (a5) and Alastair G. C. Graham (a6)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.