Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Polyethylene glycol compared with ytterbium oxide as a total faecal output marker to predict organic matter intake of dairy ewes fed indoors or at pasture

  • P. Hassoun (a1) (a2) (a3), D. Bastianelli (a1) (a2) (a3), P. Autran (a4) and F. Bocquier (a1) (a2) (a3)

Abstract

Several external markers can be used for estimating total faecal output in view of assessing ruminant intake at pasture. Among them, ytterbium (Yb) has been used for many years in various conditions. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a promising external marker because it can be rapidly determined using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). The study consisted of 24 adult lactating dairy ewes over three periods (P1, P2 and P3), fed with three different diets: P1, total mixed ration (TMR); P2, Italian ryegrass (IRG); and P3, pasture. After an adaptation period, the ewes were administered a daily dose of ytterbium oxide (0.35 g/day) and PEG (20 g/day) for 2 weeks. During the last week, the daily organic matter intake (OMIOBS) was measured. Faecal samples were collected at milking time (0800 and 1600 h) to determine marker content, using only samples collected in the morning (PEGm) or by averaging samples (Yb, PEGma). Faecal marker content made it possible to assess total faecal output, either using the two recovery rates for PEG (0.98 or 0.87) or not. The OMIOBS was assessed on the basis of total faeces estimated with Yb (OMIYb) or PEG (OMIPEG), and the digestibility was calculated on the basis of feed analysis. With total TMR (P1), the OMIPEG, corrected with recovery rate (OMIPEGm98) or not corrected (OMIPEGm) was 2.40 kg/day and 2.50 kg/day, respectively, and was not different (P>0.05) from OMIOBS (2.51 kg/day), whereas OMIYb was lower (2.14 kg/day) (P<0.001). With IRG (P2), OMIPEGm98 (1.67 kg/day), OMIPEGm87 (1.51 kg/day) and OMIYb (1.59 kg/day) were not different (P>0.05) from OMIOBS (1.57 kg/day). With pasture (P3), the OMIPEGm (1.54 kg/day) and OMIPEGm98 (1.48 kg/day) were not different (P>0.05) from the OMI assessed from the biomass measurement (1.52 kg/day). The OMIYb (1.36 kg/day) was lower (P<0.05) but not different from OMIPEGm98 and OMIPEGm87. Spearman’s rank correlation between OMIOBS and other OMIs (predicted with Yb or PEG P1 and P2) showed that it is possible to rank animals using PEG when there is a sufficiently wide range of OMIOBS (1.65 to 2.8 kg/day in P1) but not within a narrower range (1.47 to 1.72 kg/day in P2). In conclusion, the present study confirms that PEG is a valuable external faecal marker, easy to prepare (solution), administer and determine (NIRS). It can be used to assess intake with numerous animals at pasture, but only for groups, and not to quantitatively estimate individual OMI.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Andueza, D, Picard, F, Aufrère, J, Jamot, J, Béchet, G and Baumont, R 2013. Polyethylene glycol determined by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy to estimate faecal output in sheep fed fresh permanent grassland forage. Livestock Production Science 155, 3843.
Andueza, D, Picard, F, Pradel, P, Egal, D, Hassoun, P, Peccatte, JR and Baumont, R 2011. Reproducibility and repeatability of forage in vivo digestibility and voluntary intake of permanent grassland forages in sheep. Livestock Science 140, 4248.
Aufrère, J, Baumont, R, Delaby, L, Peccatte, JR, Andrieu, J, Andrieu, J-P and Dulphy, JP 2007. Prévision de la digestibilité des fourrages par la méthode pepsine-cellulase. Le point sur les équations proposées. INRA Productions Animales 20, 129136.
Brandyberry, SD, Cochran, RC, Vanzant, ES and Harmon, DL 1991. Technical note: effectiveness of different methods of continuous marker administration for estimating fecal output. Journal of Animal Science 69, 46114616.
Caja, G, Ralha, VM and Albanell, E 2009. Evaluacion del polietilenglicol (PEG6000) como marcador indigestible para ovejas lecheras en estabulacion o pastoreo. In XXXIX Jornadas de Estudio: XIII Jornadas sobre Produccion Animal (ed. Associación Interprofesional para el Desarrollo Agrario), pp. 358360, Zaragosa, Spain.
Chandler, PT, Kesler, EM and Jones, GM 1966. Excretion of polyethylene by dairy calves. Journal of Animal Science 25, 6468.
Coombe, JB and Kay, RNB 1965. Passage of digesta through the intestines of the sheep. Retention times in the small and large intestines. British Journal of Nutrition 19, 325338.
Corbett, JL, Greenhalgh, JFD, Gwynn, PE and Walker, D 1958. Excretion of chromium sesquioxide and polyethylene glycol by dairy cows. British Journal of Nutrition 12, 276.
Costa, M 1997. Toxicity and carcinogenicity of Cr(VI) in animal models and humans. Critical Reviews of Toxicology 27, 431442.
Daget, P and Poissonet, J 1971. Une méthode d’analyse phytologique des prairies. Annales Agronomiques 22, 541.
Delagarde, R, Perez-Ramirez, E and Peyraud, JL 2010. Ytterbium oxide has the same accuracy as chromic oxide for estimating variations of faecal dry matter output in dairy cows fed a total mixed ration at two feeding levels. Animal Feed Science and Technology 161, 121131.
Giger-Reverdin, S, Aufrere, J, Sauvant, D, Demarquilly, C, Vermorel, M and Pochet, S 1990. Prévision de la valeur énergétique des aliments composés pour les ruminants. INRA Productions Animales 3, 181188.
Goering, HK and Van Soest, PJ 1970. Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications), (ed. Agricultural Research Services), pp. 379398. Washington, DC USA.
Grovum, WL and Hecker, JF 1973. Rate of passage of digesta in sheep. 2. The effect of level of food intake on digesta retention times and on water and electrolyte absorption in the large intestine. British Journal of Nutrition 30, 221230.
Hassoun, P, Viudes, G, Autran, P, Bastianelli, D and Bocquier, F 2013. A method for estimating dry forage intake by sheep using polyethylene glycol as a faecal marker measured with NIRS. Animal 7, 12801288.
Hassoun, P, Autran, P, Aurel, MR, Jamot, J, Baumont, R and Bocquier, F 2007. Effect of pasture as sole feed and herbage allowances on voluntary intake of dairy ewes. Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes Série A 74, 359363.
Hatfield, PG, Clanton, DC, Sanson, DW and Eskridge, KM 1990. Methods of administering ytterbium for estimation of fecal output. Journal of Range Management 43, 316320.
Krysl, LJ, Galyean, ML, Estell, RE and Sowell, BF 1988. Estimating digestibility and faecal output in lambs using internal and external markers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 111, 1925.
Landau, S, Friedman, S, Devash, L and Mabjeesh, S 2002. Polyethylene glycol, determined by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy, as a marker of fecal output in goats. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50, 13741378.
Lund, P, Weisbjerg, MR and Hvelplund, T 2006. Passage kinetics of fibre in dairy cows obtained from duodenal and faecal ytterbium excretion. Effect of forage type. Animal Feed Science and Technology 128, 229252.
Mambrini, M and Peyraud, JL 1994. Mean retention time in digestive tract and digestion of fresh perennial ryegrass by lactating dairy cows: influence of grass maturity and comparison with a maize silage diet. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development 34, 923.
Marks, JY and Welcher, GG 1970. Interelement interferences in atomic absorption analyses with the nitrous oxide-acetylene flame. Analytical Chemistry 42, 10331040.
Mazzucotelli, A, Galli, M and Frache, R 1982. Interactions of major, minor and trace elements on the carbon rod atomic-absorption spectrophotometric determination of micro-amounts of ytterbium, holmium, dysprosium and thulium. Analyst 107, 104109.
Musimba, NKR, Galyean, ML, Holecheck, JL and Pieper, RD 1987. Ytterbium-labeled forage as a marker for estimation of cattle fecal output. Journal of Range Management 40, 418421.
Orskov, E, Ojwang, I and Reid, GW 1988. A study on consistency of differences between cows in rumen outflow rate of fibrous particles and other substrates and consequences for digestibility and intake of roughages. Animal Production 47, 4551.
Perez-Ramirez, E, Peyraud, JL and Delagarde, R 2012. N-alkanes v. ytterbium/faecal index as two methods for estimating herbage intake of dairy cows fed on diets differing in the herbage: maize silage ratio and feeding level. Animal 6, 232244.
Peyraud, JL 1997. Techniques for measuring herbage intake of grazing ruminants: a review. In Managing high yielding dairy cows at pasture, Proceedings of a one-day Seminar (ed. E Spörndly, E Burstedt and M Murphy), pp. 323. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Prigge, EC, Varga, GA, Vicini, JL and Reid, RL 1981. Comparison of ytterbium chloride and chromium sesquioxide as fecal indicators. Journal of Animal Science 53, 16291633.
Schlecht, E, Richter, H, Fernandez-Rivera, S and Becker, K 2007. Gastrointestinal passage of Sahelian roughages in cattle, sheep and goats, and implications for livestock-mediated nutrient transfers. Animal Feed Science and Technology 137, 93114.
Schwartz, D 2009. Méthodes statistiques à l’usage des médecins et des biologistes. Médecine-Sciences Flamarion, 4th edition Lavoisier, Paris, France.
Sedman, RM, Beaumont, J, McDonald, TA, Reynolds, S, Krowech, G and Howd, R 2006. Review of the evidence regarding the carcinogenicity of hexavalent chromium in drinking water. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part C-Environnemental Carcinogenesis and Ecotoxicology Reviews 24, 155182.
Sprent, P 1992. Pratique des statistiques non paramétriques. INRA Editions, Paris, France.
Vicente, F, Sarraseca, A, De Vega, A and Guada, JA 2004. Performance of several Cr and Yb analytical techniques applied to samples of different biological origin (digesta or faeces). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 84, 20352040.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed