Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:39:11.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A meta-analysis of nutrient intake, feed efficiency and performance in cattle grazing on tropical grasslands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2015

M. Boval ,
N. Edouard  and
D. Sauvant
M. Boval*
Affiliation:
INRA, UR143, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, 97170 Petit-Bourg, Guadeloupe, France (F.W.I.)
N. Edouard
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1348 Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l’Animal et les Systèmes d’Elevage, F-35590 Saint Gilles, France Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1348 Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l’Animal et les Systèmes d’Elevage, F-35000 Rennes, France
D. Sauvant
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR791 Modélisation Systémique Appliquée aux Ruminants, F-75005 Paris, France AgroParisTech, UMR 791 Modélisation Systémique Appliquée aux Ruminants, F-75005 Paris, France
*
†E-mail: maryline.boval@antilles.inra.fr
Get access

Abstract

It is essential to quantify the potential of tropical grasslands to allow significant feed efficiency for grazing livestock in controlled conditions such as at pasture. We conducted a quantitative analysis of published studies reporting the experimental results of average daily gains (ADG) and diet characteristics obtained specifically under grazing conditions (17 publications and 41 experiments), which have been less studied compared with controlled conditions in stalls. The database was analyzed to determine the average and range of values obtained for ADG (g/kg BW), dry matter digestibility, intake (DMI) and digestible DMI (DDMI, g/kg BW) and feed conversion efficiencies (FCE), as well as to predict the response of these parameters to the main strategies investigated in the literature – that is, mainly the stocking rate (SR) and the concentrate intake (CI). The ADG reached 1.2 kg BW per day and was directly linked to DDMI (ADG=−1.63+0.42 DDMI −0.0084 DDMI2, n=90, r.m.s.e=0.584, R2=0.93). The DDMI, which was representative of the nutrient input, was driven mainly by DMI rather than dry matter digestibility, whereas these two parameters did not correlate (r=0.068, P=0.56). The average global FCE (0.11 g ADG/g DDMI) showed a greater association with the metabolic FCE (0.17 g ADG/g DMI) than the digestive FCE (0.62). The CI (g DM/kg BW) increased ADG (ADG=2376+CI 56.1, n=16, r.m.s.e.=441, R2=0.95). The SR expressed as kg BW/ha decreased the individual ADG by 1.19 g/kg BW per additional ton of BW/ha, whereas the global ADG calculated per ha increased by 0.57 per additional ton BW/ha. When the SR was expressed as kg BW/ton DM and per ha rather than as kg BW/ha, the impact on the individual ADG decreased by 0.18 or 0.86 g per additional ton BW/ha, depending on the initial BW of the cattle. These results provide a better view of the potential performance and feeding of cattle in tropical grasslands. The results provide an improved quantification of the relationships between diet and performance, as well as the overall quantitative impact of SR and supplementation.

Keywords

grasslandsintakedigestibilityaverage daily gainfeed conversion efficiency
Type
Review Article
Information
animal , Volume 9 , Issue 6 , June 2015 , pp. 973 - 982
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, CJ, Purvis, HT, Horn, GW, Paisley, SI, Reuter, RR and Bodine, TN 2001. Performance of light vs heavy steers grazing plains old world bluestem at three stocking rates. Journal of Animal Science 79, 493–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agabriel, J 2007. Feeding of runimants – foreword. Productions Animales 20, 107–108.Google Scholar
Agastin, A, Sauvant, D, Naves, M and Boval, M 2014. Influence of trough versus pasture feeding on average daily gain and carcass characteristics in ruminants: a meta-analysis. Journal of Animal Science 92, 1173–1183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aharoni, Y, Henkin, Z, Ezra, A, Dolev, A, Shabtay, A, Orlov, A, Yehuda, Y and Brosh, A 2009. Grazing behavior and energy costs of activity: a comparison between two types of cattle. Journal of Animal Science 87, 2719–2731.Google Scholar
Allen, VG, Batello, C, Berretta, EJ, Hodgson, J, Kothmann, M, Li, X, McIvor, J, Milne, J, Morris, C, Peeters, A and Sanderson, M 2011. An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals. Grass and Forage Science 66, 2–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso, L, Maquivar, M, Galina, CS, Mendoza, GD, Guzmán, A, Estrada, S, Villareal, M and Molina, R 2008. Effect of ruminally protected methionine on the productive and reproductive performance of grazing bos indicus heifers raised in the humid tropics of costa rica. Tropical Animal Health Production 40, 667–672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aranda, E, Mendoza, GD, Garcia-Bojalil, C and Castrejon, F 2001. Growth of heifers grazing stargrass complemented with sugar cane, urea and a protein supplement. Livestock Production Science 71, 201–206.Google Scholar
Archimède, H, Eugène, M, Marie Magdeleine, C, Boval, M, Martin, C, Morgavi, DP, Lecomte, P and Doreau, M 2011. Comparison of methane production between C3 and C4 grasses and legumes. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 59–64.Google Scholar
Ayantunde, AA, Fernández-Rivera, S, Hiernaux, PH and Tabo, R 2008. Implications of restricted access to grazing by cattle in wet season in the sahel. Journal of Arid Environments 72, 523–533.Google Scholar
Ayantunde, AA, Fernandez-Rivera, S, Hiernaux, PHY, Keulen, Hv, Udo, HM and Chanono, M 2001. Effect of timing and duration of grazing of growing cattle in the west African sahel on diet selection, faecal output, eating time, forage intake and live-weight changes. Animal Science 72, 117–128.Google Scholar
Bodine, TN and Purvis, HT 2003. Effects of supplemental energy and/or degradable intake protein on performance, grazing behavior, intake, digestibility, and fecal and blood indices by beef steers grazed on dormant native tallgrass prairie. Journal of Animal Science 81, 307–317.Google Scholar
Boval, M and Dixon, RM 2012. The importance of grasslands for animal production and other functions: a review on management and methodological progress in the tropics. Animal 6, 748–762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boval, M, Peyraud, JL and Xande, A 1996. Effect of nocturnal enclosing and splitting offered area on herbage intake of tethered creole heifers. Animal Research 45, 219–231.Google Scholar
Boval, M, Fanchone, A, Archimede, H and Gibb, MJ 2007. Effect of structure of a tropical pasture on ingestive behaviour, digestibility of diet and daily intake by grazing cattle. Grass and Forage Science 62, 44–54.Google Scholar
Boval, M, Cruz, P, Ledet, JE, Coppry, O, Borel, H and Archimède, H 2002. Effect of nitrogen on intake and digestibility of a tropical grass grazed by creole heifers. The Journal of Agricultural Science 138, 73–84.Google Scholar
Braghieri, A, Pacelli, C, De Rosa, G, Girolami, A, De Palo, P and Napolitano, F 2011. Podolian beef production on pasture and in confinement. Animal 5, 927–937.Google Scholar
Bruinenberg, MH, Valk, H, Korevaar, H and Struik, PC 2002. Factors affecting digestibility of temperate forages from seminatural grasslands: a review. Grass and Forage Science 57, 292–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrera, EJ, Mendoza, MG, Aranda, IE, Garcia-Bojalil, C, Barcena, GR and Ramos, JJ 2000. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and nitrogenous supplementation in growing steers grazing tropical pastures. Animal Feed Science and Technology 83, 49–55.Google Scholar
Calegare, L, Alencar, MM, Packer, IU and Lanna, DP 2007. Energy requirements and cow/calf efficiency of Nellore and Continental and British Bos taurus×Nellore crosses. Journal of Animal Science 85, 2413–2422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chacon, EA, Stobbs, TH and Dale, MB 1978. Influence of sward characteristics on grazing behavior and growth of hereford steers grazing tropical grass pastures. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29, 89–102.Google Scholar
Coleman, SW and Forbes, TDA 1998. Herbage characteristics and performance of steers grazing old world bluestem. Journal of Range Management 51, 399–407.Google Scholar
Coleman, SW and Moore, JE 2003. Feed quality and animal performance. Field Crops Research 84, 17–29.Google Scholar
Cottle, DJ 2013. The trials and tribulations of estimating the pasture intake of grazing animals. Animal Production Science 53, 1209–1220.Google Scholar
d’Alexis, S, Sauvant, D and Boval, M 2013. Mixed grazing systems of sheep and cattle to improve live weight gain: a quantitative review. Journal of Agricultural Science 152, 655–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devendra, C and Leng, RA 2011. Feed resources for animals in asia: issues, strategies for use, intensification and integration for increased productivity. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 24, 303–321.Google Scholar
Dixon, RM and Egan, AR 2000. Response of lambs fed low quality roughage to supplements based on urea, cereal grain, or protein meals. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 811–821.Google Scholar
Dixon, RM and Coates, DB 2008. Diet quality and liveweight gain of steers grazing Leucaena-grass pasture estimated with faecal near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (F. NIRS). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 835–842.Google Scholar
Esterhuizen, J, Groenewald, IB, Strydom, PE and Hugo, A 2008. The performance and meat quality of Bonsmara steers raised in a feedlot, on conventional pastures or on organic pastures. South African Journal of Animal Science 38, 303–314.Google Scholar
Felius, M, Koolmees, PA and Theunissen, B, European Cattle Genetic Diversity Consortium and Lenstra JA 2011. On the breeds of cattle: historic and current classifications. Diversity 3, 660–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garay, AH, Sollenberger, LE, McDonald, DC, Ruegsegger, GJ, Kalmbacher, RS and Mislevy, P 2004. Nitrogen fertilization and stocking rate affect stargrass pasture and cattle performance. Crop Science 44, 1348–1354.Google Scholar
Godfray, HCJ, Beddington, JR, Crute, IR, Haddad, L, Lawrence, D, Muir, JF, Pretty, J, Robinson, S, Thomas, SM and Toulmin, C 2010. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327, 812–818.Google Scholar
Gomez-Vazquez, A, Perez, J, Mendoza, GD, Aranda, E and Hernandez, A 2003. Fibrolytic exogenous enzymes improve performance in steers fed sugar cane and stargrass. Livestock Production Science 82, 249–254.Google Scholar
Gregorini, P, Gunter, SA and Beck, PA 2008. Matching plant and animal processes to alter nutrient supply in strip-grazed cattle: timing of herbage and fasting allocation. Journal of Animal Science 86, 1006–1020.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, LD, Munger, A, Rerat, M, Junghans, P, Gors, S, Metges, CC and Dohme-Meier, F 2011. Energy expenditure of grazing cows and cows fed grass indoors as determined by the C-13 bicarbonate dilution technique using an automatic blood sampling system. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 1989–2000.Google Scholar
Kondo, S 2011. Recent progress in the study of behavior and management in grazing cattle. Animal Science Journal 82, 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leng, RA 1990. Factors affecting the utilization of ‘poor-quality’ forages by ruminants particularly under tropical conditions. Nutrition Research Reviews 3, 277–303.Google Scholar
Lippke, H 1980. Forage characteristics related to intake, digestibility and gain by ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 50, 952–961.Google Scholar
Milford, R and Minson, DJ 1965. The relation between the crude protein content and the digestible crude protein content of tropical pasture plants. Journal British Grassland Society 20, 177–179.Google Scholar
O’Mara, FP 2012. The role of grasslands in food security and climate change. Annals of Botany 110, 1263–1270.Google Scholar
Peel, MC, Finlayson, BL and McMahon, TA 2007. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 11, 1633–1644.Google Scholar
Pereira, JM, Tarre, RM, Macedo, R, de Paula Rezende, C, Alves, BJ, Urquiaga, S and Boddey, RM 2009. Productivity of Brachiaria humidicola pastures in the Atlantic forest region of Brazil as affected by stocking rate and the presence of a forage legume. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 83, 179–196.Google Scholar
Petty, SR, Poppi, DP and Triglone, T 1998. Effect of maize supplement, seasonal temperature and humidity on the liveweight gain of steers grazing irrigated Leucanea leucocephala/Digitaria eriantha pastures in north-west Australia. Journal of Agricultural Science 130, 95–105.Google Scholar
Poppi, DP and McLennan, SR 1995. Protein and energy utilization by ruminants at pasture. Journal of Animal Science 73, 278–290.Google Scholar
Pretty, J, Sutherland, WJ, Ashby, J, Auburn, J, Baulcombe, D, Bell, M, Bentley, J, Bickersteth, S, Brown, K, Burke, J, Campbell, H, Chen, K, Crowley, E, Crute, I, Dobbelaere, D, Edwards-Jones, G, Funes-Monzote, F, Godfray, HCJ, Griffon, M, Gypmantisiri, P, Haddad, L, Halavatau, S, Herren, H, Holderness, M, Izac, AM, Jones, M, Koohafkan, P, Lal, R, Lang, T, McNeely, J, Mueller, A, Nisbett, N, Noble, A, Pingali, P, Pinto, Y, Rabbinge, R, Ravindranath, NH, Rola, A, Roling, N, Sage, C, Settle, W, Sha, JM, Luo, SM, Simons, T, Smith, P, Strzepeck, K, Swaine, H, Terry, E, Tomich, TP, Toulmin, C, Trigo, E, Twomlow, S, Vis, JK, Wilson, J and Pilgrim, S 2010. The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 8, 219–236.Google Scholar
Ramos, JA, Mendoza, GD, Aranda, E, Garcia-Bojalil, C, Barcena, R and Alanis, J 1998. Escape protein supplementation of growing steers grazing stargrass. Animal Feed Science and Technology 70, 249–256.Google Scholar
Reynolds, C, Crompton, L and Mills, J 2010. Livestock and climate change impacts in the developing world. Outlook on Agriculture 39, 245–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero, A and Siebert, BD 1980. Seasonal-variations of nitrogen and digestible energy-intake of cattle on tropical pasture. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 31, 393–400.Google Scholar
Salah, N, Sauvant, D and Archimède, H 2014. Nutritional requirements of sheep, goats and cattle in warm climates. A meta-analysis. Animal 8, 1439–1447.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D, Schmidely, P, Daudin, JJ and St-Pierre, NR 2008. Meta-analyses of experimental data in animal nutrition. Animal 2, 1203–1214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sollenberger, LE and Vanzant, ES 2011. Interrelationships among forage nutritive value and quantity and individual animal performance. Crop Science 51, 420–432.Google Scholar
Sollenberger, LE, Moore, JE, Allen, VG and Pedreira, CG 2005. Reporting forage allowance in grazing experiments. Crop Science 45, 896–900.Google Scholar
Sprinkle, JE, Holloway, JW, Warrington, BG, Ellis, WC, Stuth, JW, Forbes, TD and Greene, LW 2000. Digesta kinetics, energy intake, grazing behavior, and body temperature of grazing beef cattle differing in adaptation to heat. Journal of Animal Science 78, 1608–1624.Google Scholar
Vetter, S 2005. Rangelands at equilibrium and non-equilibrium: recent developments in the debate. Journal of Arid Environments 62, 321–341.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, JM 2011. Re-defining efficiency of feed use by livestock. Animal 5, 1014–1022.Google Scholar
Wirsenius, S, Azar, C and Berndes, G 2010. How much land is needed for global food production under scenarios of dietary changes and livestock productivity increases in 2030? Agricultural Systems 103, 621–638.Google Scholar