Skip to main content Accessibility help

The effect of Piétrain sire on the performance of the progeny of two commercial dam breeds: a pig intervention study

  • C. De Cuyper (a1), S. Tanghe (a1), S. Janssens (a2), A. Van den Broeke (a1), J. Van Meensel (a1), M. Aluwé (a1), B. Ampe (a1), N. Buys (a2) and S. Millet (a1)...


Genetic evaluation of Piétrain sires in Flanders occurs under standardized conditions, on test stations with fixed dam breeds, standardized diets and uniform management practices. As environmental conditions vary on commercial farms and differ from the test stations, this study aimed at understanding to what extent the sire, the dam breed and the interaction between both affects the translation of breeding values to practice. Dams of two commercial breeds were inseminated with semen from one of five different sires selected for contrasting breeding values (daily gain, feed conversion ratio and carcass quality). For each sire by dam breed combination, six pen replicates (with three gilts and three barrows per pen) were evaluated for growth performance from 9 weeks of age (20 kg) to slaughter (110 kg), and for carcass and meat quality. In our experimental setup, both sire and dam breed affected growth, carcass and meat quality traits. No significant sire×dam breed interactions on performance could be detected. Though a tendency for interaction on average daily feed intake between 20 and 110 kg (P=0.087), and on pork colour (lightness) (P=0.093) was present. In general, offspring of all tested sires behaved similarly in both dam breeds, indicating that estimated breeding values for Piétrain sires determined in one dam breed are representative in other dam breeds as well.


Corresponding author


Hide All

Present address: Nutrition Sciences N.V., Booiebos 5, 9031 Drongen, Belgium.



Hide All
Bereskin, B, Davey, RJ and Peters, WH 1976. Genetic, sex and diet effects on pig growth and feed use. Journal of Animal Science 43, 977984.
Bidanel, JP and Ducos, A 1996. Genetic correlations between test station and on-farm performance traits in Large White and French Landrace pig breeds. Livestock Production Science 45, 5562.
Bligh, EG and Dyer, WJ 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology 37, 911917.
Boccard, R, Buchter, L, Casteels, E, Cosentino, E, Dransfield, E, Hood, DE, Joseph, RL, MacDougall, DB, Rhodes, DN, Schön, I, Tinbergen, BJ and Touraille, C 1981. Procedures for measuring meat quality characteristics in beef production experiments. Report of a working group in the commission of the European communities’ (CEC) beef production research programme. Livestock Production Science 8, 385397.
Brandt, H, Werner, DN, Baulain, U, Brade, W and Weissmann, F 2009. Genotype–environment interactions for growth and carcass traits in different pig breeds kept under conventional and organic production systems. Animal 4, 535544.
Department Agriculture and Fisheries 2016. Spermacentra varkens – Jaarrapport 2016. Flemish Government, Brussels, Belgium.
Gonyou, HW and Stricklin, WR 1998. Effects of floor area allowance and group size on the productivity of growing/finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 76, 13261330.
Henderson, CR 1973. Sire evaluation and genetic trends. Journal of Animal Science 1973, 1041.
Honikel, KO 1987. How to measure the water-holding capacity of meat? Recommendation of standardized methods. In Evaluation and control of meat quality in pigs (ed. PV Tarrant, G Eikelenboom and G Monin), pp. 129142. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Hutchens, LK, Hintz, RL and Johnson, RK 1982. Breed comparisons for age and weight at puberty in gilts. Journal of Animal Science 55, 6.
Knap, PW and Su, G 2008. Genotype by environment interaction for litter size in pigs as quantified by reaction norms analysis. Animal 2, 17421747.
Labroue, F, Guéblez, R, Meunier-Salaün, M-C and Sellier, P 1999. Feed intake behaviour of group-housed Piétrain and Large White growing pigs. Annales de Zootechnie 48, 247261.
Lean, IJ, Curran, MK, Duckworth, JE and Holmes, W 1972. Studies on Belgian Pietrain pigs 1. A comparison of Pietrain, Landrace and Pietrain Landrace crosses in growth, carcass characteristics and meat quality. Animal Science 15, 19.
McKay, RM, Rempel, WE, Cornelius, SG and Allen, CE 1984a. Differences in carcass traits of three breeds of swine and crosses at five stages of development. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 64, 293304.
McKay, RM, Rempel, WE, Cornelius, SG and Allen, CE 1984b. Visceral characteristics of three breeds of swine and their corsses. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 64, 919.
McLaren, DG, Buchanan, DS and Johnson, RK 1987a. Growth performance for four breeds of swine: crossbred females and purebred and crossbred boars. Journal of Animal Science 64, 99108.
McLaren, DG, Buchanan, DS and Johnson, RK 1987b. Individual heterosis and breed effects for postweaning performance and carcass traits in four breeds of swine. Journal of Animal Science 64, 8398.
Merks, JWM 1989. Genotype×environment interactions in pig breeding programmes. VI. Genetic relations between performances in central test, on-farm test and commercial fattening. Livestock Production Science 22, 325339.
Millet, S and Aluwe, M 2014. Compensatory growth response and carcass quality after a period of lysine restriction in lean meat type barrows. Archives of Animal Nutrition 68, 1628.
Oliver, MA, Gou, P, Gispert, M, Diestre, A, Arnau, J, Noguera, JL and Blasco, A 1994. Comparison of five types of pig crosses. II. Fresh meat quality and sensory characteristics of dry cured ham. Livestock Production Science 40, 179185.
Patience, JF, Rossoni-Serão, MC and Gutiérrez, NA 2015. A review of feed efficiency in swine: biology and application. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 6, 33.
R Core Team 2017. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Street, BR and Gonyou, HW 2008. Effects of housing finishing pigs in two group sizes and at two floor space allocations on production, health, behavior, and physiological variables 1. Journal of Animal Science 86, 982991.
Susenbeth, A and Keitel, K 1988. Partition of whole body protein in different body fractions and some constants in body composition in pigs. Livestock Production Science 20, 3752.
Tanghe, S, Millet, S, Hellebuyck, S, Van Meensel, J, Buys, N, De Smet, S and Janssens, S 2015. Effect of sex and sire on lean meat percentage and weight of primal cuts of pork using Autofom data. In Proceedings of the 66th Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science, 31 August to 4 September 2015, Warsaw, Poland, 166 pp.
Van Diepen, TA and Kennedy, BW 1989. Genetic correlations between test station and on-farm performance for growth rate and backfat in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 67, 14251431.
van Milgen, J and Dourmad, J-Y 2015. Concept and application of ideal protein for pigs. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 6, 15.
Wallenbeck, A, Rydhmer, L and Lundeheim, N 2009. GxE interactions for growth and carcass leanness: re-ranking of boars in organic and conventional pig production. Livestock Science 123, 154160.
Wood, JD, Nute, GR, Richardson, RI, Whittington, FM, Southwood, O, Plastow, G, Mansbridge, R, da Costa, N and Chang, KC 2004. Effects of breed, diet and muscle on fat deposition and eating quality in pigs. Meat Science 67, 651667.
Zhou, X, Beltranena, E and Zijlstra, RT 2016. Effect of feeding wheat- or barley-based diets with low or and high nutrient density on nutrient digestibility and growth performance in weaned pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 218, 9399.


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

De Cuyper et al. supplementary material
Tables S1-S5

 Word (35 KB)
35 KB


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed