Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T23:29:54.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Applying welfare training in global commercial settings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

A Butterworth*
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, Clinical Veterinary Science, Langford, N Somerset BS40 5DU, UK
P Whittington
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Training, The Longhouse, East Street, Banwell, North Somerset BS29 6BW, UK
A Hammond-Seaman
Affiliation:
RSPCA International, Wilberforce Way, Southwater, West Sussex RH13 9RS, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: andy.butterworth@bris.ac.uk

Abstract

Around the world, people who care for animals as stock-keepers, stockmen, farmers, producers are placed in a position where they can greatly influence the quality of life of the animals they manage. A stock-keeper's viewpoint on animal welfare and animal care will be enormously influenced by their cultural frame, how animals are viewed in the society where they live, and how much ‘permission to care’ the individual stockman sees as being granted to them in the place where they work. Sometimes the capacity to care is subsumed by commercial production pressures, lack of time, lack of motivation, perceived lack of resources, perceived lack of ‘value’ for individual animals, lack of perception of animal issues, or sometimes through a lack of knowledge or exposure to concepts of animal care and welfare. The extent and focus of animal welfare training is moulded by the needs of the audience, the company, the retailer or the legislator. For these reasons ‘one size fits all’ training is not usually appropriate, although there may be some general rules which can be applied to nearly all welfare training. These general rules include: do not start by importing values and technology/procedures which those trained cannot use; understand why the people you train do what they do; the initial training should be sympathetic to local knowledge and resources; engage with the industry and its affiliates and if at all possible, obtain government, professional and academic support and involvement; and beware that in the absence of knowledge and training, new technologies and new procedures can create new welfare problems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2012 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butterworth, A 2009 Animal welfare indicators and their use in society. In: Smulders, JFM and Algers, B (eds) Food Safety Assurance and Veterinary Public Health, Volume 5 pp 371389. Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, A, Knowles, TG, Whittington, PE, Matthews, L, Rogers, A and Bagshaw, CS 2007 Validation of broiler chicken gait scoring training in Thailand, Brazil and New Zealand. Animal Welfare 16: 17717910.1017/S0962728600031274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, A, Mench, JA and Wielebnowski, N 2011 Practical strategies to assess (and improve) welfare. In: Appleby, MC, Mench, JA, Olsson, IAS and Hughes, BO (eds) Animal Welfare pp 200214. CABI Publishing: Oxford, UK10.1079/9781845936594.0200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Union 2007 Council Directive 2007/43/EC laying down minimum rules for the protection of chickens kept for meat production. EC: Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D 2008 Understanding Animal Welfare: The Science in its Cultural Context. Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D and MacRae, AM 2011 Four types of activities that affect animals: implications for animal welfare science and animal ethics philosophy. Animal Welfare 20: 58159010.1017/S0962728600003213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullan, S, Edwards, SA, Butterworth, A, Whay, HR and Main, DCJ 2011 A pilot investigation of Farm Assurance assessors’ attitude to farm animal welfare as a confounding factor to training in pig welfare outcome measures. Animal Welfare 20: 41342110.1017/S0962728600002979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RSPCA 2010 Supporting the implementation of the OIE animal welfare standards. The role that civil society plays. RSPCA: Horsham, UKGoogle Scholar
Rushen, J, Butterworth, A and Swanson, JC 2010 Animal welfare assurance: science and application. Journal of Animal Science 89: 12191228. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3589CrossRefGoogle Scholar