Hostname: page-component-7d684dbfc8-jr2wd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-09-24T01:44:32.531Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForArticlePurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForBookPurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForElementPurchase": false, "coreUseNewShare": true, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Human-Animal Relationship in Agriculture and Its Consequences for the Animal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

P H Hemsworth ,
J L Barnett  and
G J Coleman
P H Hemsworth*
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Department of Agriculture, 475 Mickleham Road, Attwood, Victoria, 3049, Australia
J L Barnett
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Department of Agriculture, 475 Mickleham Road, Attwood, Victoria, 3049, Australia
G J Coleman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, 3068, Australia
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although human factors are recognized as influential factors affecting the welfare and productivity of farm animals, only limited research has been conducted to identify these important human characteristics and to quantify their effects. During the last 13 years we have studied two apparently important human factors: the attitude and the behaviour of stockpersons towards farm animals.

We have proposed that in intensive animal production systems there are some important sequential relationships between the attitude and behaviour of the stockperson towards farm animals and the behaviour, performance and welfare of farm animals. Basically we have suggested that because a stockperson's behaviour towards animals is largely under volitional control it is strongly influenced by the attitudes and beliefs that the stockperson holds about the animals. Furthermore, the stockperson's behaviour towards animals affects the animals’ fear of humans which, in turn, affects the animals’ productivity and welfare. It is the occurrence of a stress response by animals which are highly fearful of humans which places their productivity and welfare at risk We have published data which strongly support these interrelationships between human attitude and behaviour and animal behaviour, productivity and welfare. This paper reviews this and other research on this subject. The results of research in the pig industry and to a lesser extent, the poultry industries indicate the excellent opportunity which exists to improve animal productivity and welfare by training and selecting stockpersons to have desirable attitudinal and behavioural profiles towards farm animals.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourfearhuman-animal interactionsproductivitystress
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , February 1993 , pp. 33 - 51
Copyright
© 1993 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajzen, I and Flshbein, M 1980 Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Prentice-Hall: New JerseyGoogle Scholar
Arave, C W, Mickelsen, C H and Walters, J L 1985 Effect of early rearing experience on subsequent behavior and production of holstein heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 923–929CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnett, J L and Hemsworth, P H 1990 The validity of physiological and behavioural measures of animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 25: 177–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, J L and Hutson, G D 1987 Objective assessment of welfare in the pig: contributions from physiology and behaviour. In Manipulating Pig Production ppl-22. APSA (Australasian Pig Science Association) Committee, Werribee, Victoria, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Barnett, J L, Hemsworth, P H and Hand, A M 1983 The effect of chronic stress on some blood parameters in the pig. Applied Animal Ethology 9: 273–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, J L, Hemsworth, P H and Newman, E A 1992 Fear of humans and its relationships with productivity in laying hens at commercial farms. British Poultry Science 33: 699–710CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blicknell, R J 1985 Endogenous opioid peptides and hypothalamic neuroendocrine neurones. Journal of Endocrinology 107: 437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohus, B, Koolhaas, J M, Nyakas, C, Steffens, A B, Fokkema, D S and Scheurink, A J W 1987 Physiology of stress: a behavioural view. In Wiepkema, P R and Van Adrichem, V W M (eds) Biology of Stress in Farm Animals, an Integrative Approach pp 57–70. Martinus Nijhoff: DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boissy, A and Bouissou, M F 1988 Effects of early handling on heifers’ subsequent reactivity to humans and to unfamiliar situations. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20: 259–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boivin, X, LeNeindre, P and Chupin, J M 1992 Establishment of cattle-human relationships. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32: 325–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bone, J F 1988 Animal Anatomy and Physiology. Prentice Hall: New JerseyGoogle Scholar
Bredbacka, P 1988 Relationships between fear, welfare and productive traits in caged White Leghorn hens. In Unshelm J, Van Putten G, Zeeb K and Ekesbo (eds) Proceedings of the International Congress on Applied Ethology in Farm Animals, Skara 1988 pp 74–79Google Scholar
Broom, D M 1983 Stereotypies as animal welfare indicators. Current Topics in Veterinary Medicine Animal Science 23: 81–87Google Scholar
Buchenauer, D 1981 Parameters for assessing welfare, ethological criteria. In Sybesma, W (ed) The Welfare of Pigs pp 75–89. Martinus Nijhoff: The HagueCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckland, R B, Goldrosen, A and Bernon, D E 1974 Effect of blood sampling by cardiac puncture on subsequent body weight of broilers and S.C. White Leghorn replacement pullets. Poultry Science 53: 1256–1258CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cannon, W B 1914 The emergency function of the adrenal medulla in pain and the major emotions. American Journal of Physiology 33: 356–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, J W and Siegel, P B 1987 Human handling, flock size and responses to an K coli challenge in young chickens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 19: 183–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creel, S R and Albright, J L 1988 The effect of neonatal social isolation on the behaviour and endocrine function of Holstein calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 21: 293–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin G M, Wiepkema P R and Ree J M Van 1985 Endogenous opioids are involved in abnormal stereotyped behaviours of tethered sows. Neuropeptides 6: 527–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dantzer, R and Mormede, P 1983 Stress in farm animals: a need for reevaluation. Journal of Animal Science 57: 6–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dantzer, R, Mormede, P, Bluthe, R M and Soissions, J 1983 The effect of different housing conditions on behavioural and adrenocortical reactions in veal calves. Reproduction Nutrition Developpement 23: 501–508CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
English, P R 1991 Stockmanship, empathy and pig behaviour. Pig Veterinary Journal 26: 56–66Google Scholar
Euker, J S, Meites, J and Riegle, G D 1975 Effects of acute stress on serum LH and prolactin in intact, castrate and dexamethasone-treated male rats. Endocrinology 96: 85–92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fell, L R and Shutt, D A 1989 Behavioural and hormonal responses to acute surgical stress in sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 22: 283–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L and Carlsmith, J M 1959 Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 58: 203–210CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flores, C M, Hernandez, M C, Hargreaves, K M and Bayer, B M 1990 Restraint stress-induced elevations in plasma corticosterone and β-endorphin are not accompanied by alterations in immune function. Journal of Neuroimmunology 28: 219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordyce, G, Wythes, J R, Shorthose, W R, Underwood, D W and Shepherd, R K 1988 Cattle temperament in extensive beef herds in northern Queensland. 2. Effect of temperament on carcass and meat quality. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 28: 689–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, B M and Manning, A C C 1979 Stressor effects of handling on the immature fowl. Research in Veterinary Science 26: 223–226CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonyou, H W, Hemsworth, P H and Barnett, J L 1986 Effects of frequent interactions with humans on growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 16: 269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T 1991 Handling problems caused by excitable pigs. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, Volume 1. Kulmbach, Germany, September 1-6, 1991Google Scholar
Grandin, T, Curtis, S E and Taylor, I A 1986 Richness of pigs’ environment affects handling in chute. Journal of Animal Science (Supplement 1) 64: 161 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Grandin, T, Curtis, S E and Taylor, I A 1987 Toys, mingling and driving reduce excitability in pigs. Journal of Animal Science (Supplement 1) 65: 230 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Gray, J A 1987 The Psychology of Fear and Stress, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press: CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gross, W B and Siegel, P B 1979 Adaptation of chickens to their handlers and experimental results. Avian Diseases 23: 708–714CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, W B and Siegel, P B 1980 Effects of early environmental stresses on chicken body weight, antibody response to RBC antigens, feed efficiency and response to fasting. Avian Diseases 24: 549–579CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, W B and Siegel, P B 1982 Influences of sequences of environmental factors on the responses of chickens to fasting and to Staphylococcus aureus infection. American Journal of Veterinary Research 43: 137–139Google ScholarPubMed
Guiflre, K A, Udelsman, R, Listwak, S and Chrousos, G P 1988 Effects of immune neutralization of corticotropin-releasing hormone, adrenocorticotropin, and β-endorphin in the surgically stressed rat. Endocrinology 122: 306–310Google Scholar
Hall, J F 1989 Learning and Memory, 2nd edition. Allyn and Bacon: BostonGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P H and Barnett, J L 1987 Human-animal interactions. In Price E O (ed) The Veterinary Clinics of North America, Food Animal Practice 3: 339–356. W B Saunders Co: PhiladelphiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P H and Barnett, J L 1989 Relationships between fear of humans, productivity and cage position of laying hens. British Poultry Science 30: 505–518CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemsworth, P H and Barnett, J L 1991 The effects of aversively handling pigs either individually or in groups on their behaviour, growth and corticosteroids. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 30: 61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P H, Barnett, J L and Hansen, C 1981a The influence of handling by humans on the behaviour, growth and corticosteroids in the juvenile female pig. Hormones and Behavior 15: 396–403CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemsworth, P H, Barnett, J L and Hansen, C 1986 The influence of handling by humans on the behaviour, reproduction and corticosteroids of male and female pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 15: 303–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P H, Barnett, J L and Hansen, C 1987a The influence of inconsistent handling on the behaviour, growth and corticosteroids of young pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 17: 245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P H, Brand, A and Willems, P 1981b The behavioural response of sows to the presence of human beings and its relation to productivity. Livestock Production Science 8: 67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P H, Coleman, G J and Barnett, J L 1991 Reproductive performance of pigs and the influence of human-animal interactions. Pig News and Information 12: 563–566Google Scholar
Hemsworth, P H, Hansen, C and Barnett, J L 1987b The effects of human presence at the time of calving of primiparous cows on their subsequent behavioural response to milking. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 18: 247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P H, Barnett, J L, Coleman, G J and Hansen, C 1989a A study of the relationships between the attitudinal and behavioural profiles of stockpersons and the level of fear of humans and reproductive performance of commercial pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23: 310–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P H, Barnett, J L, Tilbrook, A J and Hansen, C 1989b The effects of handling by humans at calving and during milking on the behaviour and milk Cortisol concentrations of primiparous dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 22: 313–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P H, Barnett, J L, Treacy, D and Madgwick, P 1990 The heritability of the trait fear of humans and the association between this trait and the subsequent reproductive performance of gilts. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 25: 85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennessy, D P and Williamson, P 1983 The effects of stress and of ACTH administration in hormone profiles, oestrus and ovulation in pigs. Theriogenology 20: 13–26CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinde, R A 1970 Behaviour: A Synthesis of Ethology and Comparative Psychology. Japan: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha LtdGoogle Scholar
Jones, R B 1985 Fearfulness and adaptability in the domestic fowl. IRCS Journal of Medical Science 13: 797–800Google Scholar
Jones, R B 1991 Taming and the effects of variations in the nature of chick-human interactions. Poultry Science 70: 61 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Jones, R B and Faure, J M 1981 The effects of regular handling on fear responses in the domestic chick. Behavioural Processes 6: 135–143CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, R B and Hughes, B O 1981 Effects of regular handling on growth in male and female chicks of broiler and layer strains. British Poultry Science 22: 461–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R B, Mills, A D and Faure, JM 1991 Genetic and experimental manipulation of fear-related behaviour in Japanese Quail chicks (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Journal of Comparative Psychology 105: 15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalın, N H, Carnes, M, Barksdale, C M, Shelton, S E, Stewart, R D and Risch, S C 1985 Effects of acute behavioral stress on plasma and cerebrospinal fluid ACTH and β-endorphin in rhesus monkeys. Neuroendocrinology 40: 97–101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennes, D and Ödberg, F O 1987 Developmental study of the effect of haloperidol and naloxone on captivity-induced stereotypies. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 17: 379 (Abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, A T W, Oei, T P and Funder, J W 1983 Prolonged foot-shock induced analgesia: glucocorticoids and non-pituitary opioids are involved. Neuroendocrinology 37: 48–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liptrap, R M 1970 Effect of corticotrophin and corticosteroids on oestrus, ovulation and oestrogen excretion in the sow. Journal of Endocrinology 47: 197–205CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons, D M 1989 Individual differences in temperament of dairy goats and the inhibition of milk ejection. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 22: 269–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, J W 1968 A review of psychoendocrine research on the pituitary-adrenal cortical system. Psychosomatic Medicine 30: 576–607CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendl, M 1991 Some problems with the concept of a cut off point for determining when an animal’s welfare is at risk. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 31: 139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moberg, G P 1985 Influence of stress on reproduction: measure of well-being. In Moberg, G P (ed) Animal Stress pp 245–267. American Physiological Society, Bethesda: Maryland, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, L B 1978 The practical problems of recognizing and measuring fear and exploration behaviour in the domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour 26: 422–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, L B and Duncan, L J H 1977 Attempts to modify the responses of domestic fowl towards human beings. 1. The association of human contact with a food reward. Applied Animal Ethology 3: 321–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliverio, A 1987 Endocrine aspects of stress: central and peripheral mechanisms. In P R Wiepkema and P W M Van Adrichen (eds) Biology of Stress in Farm Animals; an Integrative Approach pp 3–12. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, G A, Olson, R D and Kastin, A J 1986 Endogenous opiates: 1985. Peptides 7: 907–933CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paris, A L and Ramaley, J A 1973 Effects of short-term stress upon fertility. I. Before puberty. Fertility and Sterility 24: 540–545CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paris, A, Kelly, P and Ramaley, J A 1973 Effects of short-term stress upon fertility. II. After puberty. Fertility and Sterility 24: 546–552CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paterson, A M and Pearce, G P 1989 Boar-induced puberty in gilts handled pleasantly or unpleasantly during rearing. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 22: 225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, G P, Paterson, A M and Pearce, A N 1989 The influence of pleasant and unpleasant handling and the provision of toys on the growth and behaviour of male pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23: 27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, D, Arave, C W and Walters, J L 1988 Relationship of three measures of behaviour to milk production. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 21: 307–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichmann, K G, Barram, K M, Brock, I J and Standfast, N F 1978 Effects of regular handling and blood sampling by wing vein puncture on the performance of broilers and pullets. British Poultry Science 19: 97–99CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rivier, C and Rivest, S 1991 Effect of stress on the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis: peripheral and central mechanisms. Biology of Reproduction 45: 523–532CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rushen J, Schouten W and Passile A M De 1990 Stereotypic behaviour, endogenous opiates and post-feeding hypoalgesia in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 26: 296–297 (Abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seabrook, M F 1972a A study to determine the influence of the herdsman’s personality on milk yield. Journal of Agriculture Labour Science 1: 45–59Google Scholar
Seabrook, M F 1972b A Study of the Influence of the Cowman’s Personality and Job Satisfaction on Milk Yield of Dairy Cows. Joint Conference of the British Society for Agriculture Labour Science and the Ergonomics Research Society, National College of Agricultural Engineering, UK, September, 1972Google Scholar
Seabrook, M F and Bartle, N C 1992 The Practical Implications of Animals’ Responses to Man. British Society of Animal Production, Winter Meeting, March 23-25, 1992, Scarborough, UK, Paper Number 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selye, H 1946 The general adaptation syndrome and the diseases of adaptation. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology 6: 117–230CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selye, H 1976 Stress in Health and Disease. Butterworths: BostonGoogle Scholar
Shutt, D A, Fell, L R, Connell, R, Bell, A K, Wallace, C A and Smith, A I 1987 Stress-induced changes in plasma concentrations of immunoreactive β-endorphin and Cortisol in response to routine surgical procedures in lambs. Australian Journal of Biological Science 40: 97–103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, C I 1976 Growth in the Hubbard broiler: increase size following early handling. Developmental Psychobiology 9: 459–464CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toates, F M 1980 Animal Behaviour - a Systems Approach. John Wiley and Sons: ChichesterGoogle Scholar
Walker, S 1987 Animal Learning: an Introduction. Routledge and Kegan Ltd: LondonGoogle Scholar
Warwick, V D, Arave, C W and Mickelson, C H 1977 Effects of group, individual and isolated rearing of calves on weight gain and behaviour. Dairy Science 60: 947–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiepkema, P R 1987 Behavioural aspects of stress. In P R Wiepkema and P W M Van Adrichem (eds) Biology of Stress in Farm Animals; an Integrative Approach pp 113–133. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiepkema P R, Broom D M, Duncan L J H and Putten G Van 1983 Abnormal Behaviours in Farm Animals. Commission of the European CommunitiesGoogle Scholar
Willis, G L 1983 A possible relationship between the flinch, step and kick response and milk yield in lactating cows. Applied Animal Ethology 10: 287–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar