Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Towards automatic interpretation of sheep ultrasound scans

  • C. A. Glasbey (a1), I. Abdalla (a2) and G. Simm (a3)

Abstract

Ultrasound imaging is widely used in animal breeding to provide in vivo estimates of the carcass composition of candidates for selection. Although the technique is less accurate than more recent medical imaging methods, such as X-ray computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, it is relatively cheap and mobile. Therefore large numbers of animals can be measured. Most current ultrasound scanners require some degree of manual interpretation of images, which is time consuming and liable to vary both between and within individuals. Hence, this study investigated the automatic interpretation of ultrasound scans from sheep. A computer algorithm is proposed for identifying tissue boundaries. Estimates of tissue depth are shown to be comparable with those obtained by manual interpretation, for images of 72 sheep scanned twice at the position of the 13th thoracic vertebra. The root-mean-square errors of subcutaneous fat depth and m. longissimus muscle depth ivere 0·7 mm and 1·7 mm, respectively.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Abdalla, I. 1994. Statistical image analysis of sheep ultrasound scans, M. Phil. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.
Alliston, J. C. 1983. Evaluation of carcass quality in the live animal. In Sheep production (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 7595. Butterworths, London,
Amit, Y., Grenander, U. and Piccioni, M. 1991. Structural image restoration through deformable templates. journal of the American Statistical Association 86: 376387.
Baldock, R. A. 1992. Trainable models for the interpretation of biomedical images. Image and Vision Computing 10: 444450.
Cootes, T. F., Hill, A., Taylor, C. J. and Haslam, J. 1994. Use of active shape models for locating structure in medical images. Image and Vision Computing 12: 355365.
Glasbey, C. A. and Horgan, G. W. 1995. Image analysis for the biological sciences. Wiley, Chichester.
Leavers, V. F. 1992. Shape detection in computer vision using the Hough transform. Springer-Verlag, London.
Lin, W. J., Pizer, S. M. and Johnson, V. E. 1991. Boundary estimation in ultrasound images. In Information processing in medical imaging. Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on information processing in medical imaging (ed. Colchester, A. C. F. and Hawkes, D. J.), pp. 285299. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Loupas, T., McDicken, W. N. and Allan, P. L. 1989. An adaptive weighted median filter for speckle suppression in medical ultrasonic images. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems 36: 129135.
Miles, C. A., Fursey, G. A. J. and York, R. W. R. 1984. New equipment for measuring the speed of ultrasound and its application in the estimation of body composition of farm livestock. In In vivo measurement of body composition in meat animals (ed. Lister, D.), pp. 93105. Elsevier, London.
Miles, C. A., Pomeroy, R. W. and Harries, J. M. 1972. Some factors affecting reproducibility in ultrasonic scanning of animals. 1. Cattle. Animal Prduction 15: 239249.
Moshfeghi, M. 1991. Elastic matching of multimodality medical images. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing — Graphical models and image processing 53: 271282.
Simm, G. 1983. The use of ultrasound to predict the carcass composition of live cattle — a review. Animal Breeding Abstracts 51: 853875.
Simm, G. 1987. Carcass evaluation in sheep breeding programmes. In New techniques in sheep production (ed. Marai, I. F. M. and Owen, J. B.), pp. 125144. Butterworths, London.
Simm, G. 1992. Selection for lean meat production in sheep. In Progress in sheep and goat research (ed. Speedy, A. W.), pp. 193215. CAB International, Wallingford.
Simm, G., Dingwall, W. S., Murphy, S. V. and FitzSimons, J. 1990. Selection for improved carcass composition in Suffolk sheep. Proceedings of the fourth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, vol. XV, pp. 100103.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Towards automatic interpretation of sheep ultrasound scans

  • C. A. Glasbey (a1), I. Abdalla (a2) and G. Simm (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.