Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T13:20:34.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the nutritive value of the diet selected by grazing sheep IV. Variation in the diet selected by sheep differing in age, breed, sex, strain and previous history

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. P. Langlands
J. P. Langlands
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O., Division of Animal Physiology, Pastoral Research Laboratory, Armidale, N.S.W., 2350, Australia
Get access

Summary

The ability of two groups of six Merino wethers aged 6 and 66 months to digest a lucerne ration was examined in order to detect possible biases in the use of faecal nitrogen as a faecal index substance. Earlier work with this technique had indicated a difference in selectivity between young and older sheep. No difference in ability to digest the ration was observed and it was concluded that the earlier observation was not an artefact in the faecal nitrogen technique. Oesophageal fistulae were prepared in 120 sheep differing in breed, sex, age, strain and previous history. Determinations were made of the nitrogen content, and in one experiment of the in vitro digestibility of the diet selected by sheep grazing various pastures. Significant differences in the nitrogen content of the diet selected by sheep varying in breed, age and previous grazing history were recorded on some pastures on some occasions but not on others. No significant differences were observed between sheep varying in strain or sex. No reason could be suggested for the occasional differences between groups in the nitrogen content or digestibility of the diet selected, but it appeared unlikely that it would be a major source of variation in the productivity of the different groups at pasture.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , August 1969 , pp. 369 - 378
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arnold, G. W., McManus, W. R., Bush, I. G. and Ball, J. 1964. The use of sheep fitted with oesophageal fistulas to measure diet quality. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 4: 71–79.Google Scholar
Commonwealth Bureau of Pastures and Field Crops. 1961. Research techniques in use at the Grassland Research Institute, Hurley. Bull. Commonw- Bur. Past. Fid Crops, Hurley, No. 45.Google Scholar
Hamilton, B. A. and Langlands, J. P. 1969. Studies of the efficiency of wool production of grazing sheep. I. Difference between Merino sheep selected for high and low fleece weight. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. (In press.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, R. W. and Doyle, J. J. 1967. Diet selected by lambs and yearling sheep grazing on annual and perennial pastures in Southern Victoria. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 7: 141–143.Google Scholar
Holmes, W., Jones, J. G. W. and Drake-Brockman, R. M. 1961. The feed intake of grazing cattle. II. The influence of size of animals on feed intake. Anim. Prod. 3: 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, J. P. 1965. Diurnal variation in the diet selected by free-grazing sheep. Nature, Land. 207: 666–667.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P. 1967. Studies on the nutritive value of the diet selected by grazing sheep. II. Some sources of error when sampling oesophageally fistulated sheep at pasture. Anim. Prod. 9: 167–175.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P. 1968. The feed intake of grazing sheep differing in age, breed, previous nutrition and liveweight. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 71: 167–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh, J. H. and Mulham, W. E. 1966. Selection of diet by sheep grazing semi-arid pastures on the Riverina Plain. I. A bladder saltbush (Atriplex vesicarid)—cotton bush (Kochia aphylld) community. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 6: 460–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, W. F., Harris, C. E. and Kemp, C. D. 1954. Studies on the digestibility of herbage. v. The variation with age, of the ability of sheep to digest herbage, with observations on the effect of season on digestive ability. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 9: 209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, R. 1947. Preliminary survey of the natural pastures of the New England District of New South Wales and a general discussion of their problems. Bull. Coun. scient. ind. Res., Melbourne No. 210.Google Scholar
Van Dyne, G. M. and Heady, H. F. 1965. Dietary chemical composition of cattle and sheep grazing in common on a dry annual range. J. Range Mgt 18: 78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar