Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T22:04:10.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the nutritive value of the diet selected by grazing sheep. III. A Comparison of oesophageal fistula and faecal index techniques for the indirect estimation of digestibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. P. Langlands
J. P. Langlands
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O., Pastoral Research Laboratory, Armidale, N.S.W., Australia
Get access

Extract

Regression equations relating the intake factor to the dissolved faeces fraction, faecal nitrogen and faecal cellulose contents were derived in a continous digestibility trial with cut herbage, and also with sheep fitted with oesophageal fistulae grazing the pasture from which the herbage was cut. In the grazing trial the intake factor was calculated from the in vitro digestibility of the fistula samples.

The relationships established in the digestiblity trial differed significantly (P<0·001) from those in the grazing trial. These differences may have arisen from selective grazing or from bias in estimating digestibility from fistula samples.

The digestibility of the diet selected in the grazing trial was estimated from the various faecal index relationships established. These estimates were very variable. In contrast there was reasonable agreement between estimates derived by the fistula technique and those predicted from a ‘general’ relationship between the intake factor and faecal nitrogen as established at this Laboratory with a wide range of herbages.

It is concluded that faecal index relationships must be derived with material similar to that selected by the sheep when grazing.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , August 1967 , pp. 325 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, R. H., & McGowan, M., 1961. A filtration procedure for the in vitro determination of digestibility of herbage. J. Br. Grassld Sac., 16: 275–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian, K. R., & Coup, M. R., 1954. Measurement of feed intake by grazing cattle and sheep. VI. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces. N.Z. J. Sci. Tech., 36(A): 328–330.Google Scholar
Crampton, E. W., & Maynard, L. A., 1938. The relationship of cellulose and lignin content to the nutritive value of feed. J. Nutr., 15: 383–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D., Corbett, J. L., & McDonald, I., 1960. The indirect estimation of the digestibility of pasture herbage. II. Regressions of digestibility on faecal nitrogen concentration; their determination in continuous digestibility trials and the effect of various factors on their accuracy. J. agric. Sci., Camb., 55: 377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambourne, L. J., & Reardon, T. F., 1962. Use of ‘seasonal’ regressions in measuring feed intake of grazing animals. Nature, Land., 196: 961–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambourne, L. J., & Reardon, T. F., 1963. The use of chromium oxide and faecal nitrogen concentration to estimate the pasture intake of Merino wethers. Aust. J. agric. Res., 14: 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, J. P., Corbett, J. L., & McDonald, I., 1963. The indirect estimation of the digestibility of pasture herbage. III. Regressions of digestibility on faecal nitrogen concentration; effects of species and individuality of animal and of the method of determining digestibility upon the relationships. J. agric. Sci., Camb., 61: 221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, J. P., & Corbett, J. L., 1964. A study of the ‘dissolved faeces fraction’ method for the indirect estimation of herbage intake. J. agric. Sci., Camb., 63: 305–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, J. P., 1966. Studies on the nutritive value of the diet selected by grazing sheep. I. Differences in composition between herbage consumed and material collected from oesophageal fistulae. Anim. Prod., 8: 253–259.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P., 1967. Studies on the nutritive value of the diet selected by grazing sheep. II. Some sources of error when sampling oesophageally fistulated sheep at pasture. Anim. Prod., 9: 167–175.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B., 1961. A new method of estimating the dry matter intake of grazing sheep from their faecal output. Nature, Land., 192: 92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raymond, W. F., Kemp, C. D., Kemp, A. W., & Harris, C. E., 1954. Studies in the digestibility of herbage. IV. The use of faecal collection and chemical analysis in pasture studies, b. Faecal index methods. J. Br. Grassld Soc., 9: 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, W. F., Jones, E. C., & Harris, C. E., 1955. Factors affecting the accuracy of normal-acid fibre determinations and its use as a faecal index component. Agric. Prog. 30: 120–124.Google Scholar
Raymond, W. F., Minson, D. J., & Harris, C. E., 1959. Studies in the digestibility of herbage. VI. Further evidence on the effect of level of intake on the digestive efficiency of sheep. J. Br. Grassld Soc., 14: 75–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. T., Woolfolk, P. G., Hardison, W. A., Martin, C. M., Brundage, A. L., & Kaufmann, R. W., 1952. A procedure for measuring the digestibility of pasture forage under grazing conditions. J. Nutr., 46: 255–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, C. R., & Reid, J. T., 1952. The use of methoxyl groups in forage and faecal materials as an index of the feeding value of forages. J. Dairy Sci., 35: 595–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar