Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T12:01:36.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some effects of alternating high and low levels of feed intake on the performance and composition of the growing pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

V. R. Fowler  and
R. M. Livingstone
V. R. Fowler
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
R. M. Livingstone
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
Get access

Summary

Three experiments were carried out in which the level of feed intake of pigs growing from approximately 30 to 90 kg was alternately raised and lowered, using different amplitudes and time-periods. Within each experiment, the total feed intake and the length of the experimental period were the same for all treatment-groups.

The two amplitudes which were examined were 112%–88% and 125 %–75% of standard scales of feeding. The time-periods between switches to the alternate level were 1, 3, 7 or 14 days. The impact of the fluctuations in feed intake on overall performance and carcass composition was either trivial or small, and in no case exceeded 5% for any one measurement. It is concluded that fluctuations in feed intake occurring in practical situations will have only trivial effects on performance, provided that pigs receive similar amounts of feed in the same overall period of time.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , February 1971 , pp. 59 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adam, J. L. and Smith, W. C. 1964. The use of specific gravity and its reciprocal in predicting the carcass composition of pigs slaughtered at three weights. Anim. Prod. 6: 97–105.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1967. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 3 Pigs. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Braude, R. 1967. The effect of changes in feeding patterns on the performance of pigs. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 26: 163–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buck, S. F., Harrington, G. and Johnson, R. F. 1962. The prediction of lean percentage of pigs of bacon weight from carcass measurements. Anim. Prod. 4: 25–36.Google Scholar
Cohn, C. and Joseph, D. 1959. Changes in body composition attendant on force feeding. Am. J. Physiol. 196: 965–968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fábry, P. and Braun, T. 1967. Adaptation to the pattern of food intake: some mechanisms and consequences. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 26: 144–152.Google Scholar
Heggeness, F. W. 1965. Effect of intermittent food restriction on growth, food utilization and body composition of the rat. J. Nutr. 86: 265–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, K. G. 1965. Preliminary observations of feed consumption variations in group-fed pigs. Anim. Prod. 7: 285 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Osbourne, D. F. and Wilson, P. N. 1960. Effects of different patterns of allocation of a restricted quantity of food upon the growth and development of cockerels. J. agrie. Sci., Camb. 54: 278–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomson, E. G. 1965. Vestn. sel'.-Khoz. Nauki, Mosk. No. 6: 89.Google Scholar
Veum, T. L., Pond, W. G. and Walker, E. J. Jr. 1966. Some effects of varied frequency of feeding. Proc. Cornell Nutr. Conf. 1966: 111–117.Google Scholar