Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:07:51.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Soaking of complete fattening rations high in poor roughage 3. The effect of moisture content and spontaneous fermentation on the performance of male cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

Z. Holzer
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Organization, Nve Ya'ar Regional Experiment Station, Haifa, Israel
D. Levy
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Organization, Nve Ya'ar Regional Experiment Station, Haifa, Israel
H. Tagari
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel
R. Volcani
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel
Get access

Summary

Two trials were conducted with two complete fattening diets contain- ing 25 and 45 % fibrous roughage, to examine the effects of three moisture levels and five soaking conditions on the performance and ruminal fermentation of fattening cattle.

Differences between treatments in live-weight gain and carcass-weight gain were not significant but there were differences in the efficiency of conversion of metabolizable energy into live weight and into carcass weight and in some instances these were significant. There was a trend towards increased weight of kidney, pelvic and cod fats and a slight decrease in weight of other fat trim of the carcass (subcutaneous and intermuscular) on the treated diets, as compared with the dry control diet.

The pH of the rumen liquor of animals given the soaked rations was lower and the total volatile fatty acid concentration higher than that of animals receiving the dry control diet. The propionic acid concentration in rumen liquor was significantly higher in animals receiving moistened diets.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Beeson, W. M. and Perry, T. W. 1958. The comparative feeding value of high moisture corn and low moisture corn with different feed additives for fattening beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 17: 368373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. 1967. The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants. 2nd ed. Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Clapperton, J. L. and Watnman, F. W. 1966. Utilization of the energy and protein of the same diet by cattle of different ages. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 67: 6773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhardt, J. D., Embry, L. B. and Luther, R. M. 1969. Methods of processing maize grain for high-concentrate diets for cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 29: 153154. (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11: 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flatt, W. P. and Coppock, C. E. 1965. Physiological factors influencing the energy metabolism of ruminants. In Physiology of Digestion in the Ruminant (ed. Dougherty, R. W.), pp. 240253. Butterworth, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Heuberger, G. L., Mitchell, G. E. Jr, Albert, W. W. and Neumann, A. L. 1959. The effect of moisture content of field shelled corn on harvesting and storage losses and on its feeding value for beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 18: 1527. (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Holzer, Z., Levy, D., Tagari, H. and Volcani, R. 1975. Soaking of complete fattening rations high in poor roughage. 1. The effect of moisture content and spontaneous fermentation on nutritional value. Anim. Prod. 21: 323335.Google Scholar
Holzer, Z., Tagari, H., Levy, D. and Volcani, R. 1976. Soaking of complete fattening rations high in poor roughage. 2. The effect of moisture content and of particle size of the roughage component on the performance of male cattle. Anim. Prod. 22: 4153.Google Scholar
Kromann, R. P. and Meyer, J. H. 1972. Rumen metabolism in sheep as influenced by interactions among the ration's energy content, physical form and buffers. J. Anim. Sci. 34: 813819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, D., Holzer, Z. and Folman, Y. 1975. Effect of concentrate: roughage ratio on the production of beef from Israeli-Friesian bulls slaughtered at different live weights. Anim. Prod. 20: 199205.Google Scholar
Matsushima, J. K. and Stenquist, N. J. 1967. Reconstituted, ensiled and flaked com for cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 26: 925. (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Plasto, A. W. and Gellert, M. J. 1972. High moisture grain sorghum in a feedlot ration. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 9: 262265.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R. and Willis, M. B. 1970. Intensive Beef Production. Pergamon, London.Google Scholar
Riggs, J. K. 1969. Processing moist grain sorghum for beef cattle. Trans. Am. Soc. agric. Engrs 12: 782785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggs, J. K. and McGinty, D. D. 1970. Early harvested and reconstituted sorghum grain for cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 31: 991995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, J. H. B. 1970. The Calf. Vol. 2. Nutrition and Health. 3rd ed., p. 20. Iliffe, London.Google Scholar
Tonroy, B. R., Perry, T. W. and Beeson, W. M. 1974. Dry, ensiled high-moisture, ensiled reconstituted high-moisture and volatile fatty acid treated high-moisture corn for growing-finishing beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 39: 931936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, D. G. and Schneider, W. W. 1970. Influence of storage time on feeding value of whole reconstituted milo. Misc. Publs Okla. agric. Exp. Stn, No. 84, pp. 2932.Google Scholar
White, A., Handler, P. and Smith, E. L. 1973. Principles of Biochemistry. 5th ed., p. 573. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar