Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T13:54:52.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responses in wool and live weight when different sources of dietary protein are given to pregnant and lactating ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. G. Masters ,
C. A. Stewart ,
G. Mata  and
N. R. Adams
D. G. Masters
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Production, CSIRO, Private Bag, PO Wembley, WA 6014, Australia
C. A. Stewart
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Production, CSIRO, Private Bag, PO Wembley, WA 6014, Australia
G. Mata
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Production, CSIRO, Private Bag, PO Wembley, WA 6014, Australia
N. R. Adams
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Production, CSIRO, Private Bag, PO Wembley, WA 6014, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Wool growth, staple strength and fibre diameter are reduced during pregnancy and lactation. This may be due to the increased requirement for protein for foetal growth, udder development and milk production causing a lack of amino acids for wool. Responses in wool production, ewe live weight, lamb birth weight and growth, plasma amino acids and levels of cortisol, insulin and growth hormone were measured when different sources of protein were offered. Either lupin seed (L), fish meal (F) or formaldehyde-treated egg white (E) were included in an oaten hay-based diet offered during the final 3 weeks of pregnancy and first 3 weeks of lactation. Provision of diets containing E or F resulted in significant (P < 0·001) increases in wool growth and trends towards increased staple strength (4 to 6 N/ktex) and clean fleece weights (0·17 to 0·38 kg) compared with the sheep given L. Feeding the E diet increased the concentration of cystine in plasma and sulphur in wool in late pregnancy. Feeding the F diet increased the concentrations of arginine, histidine, lysine and threonine in plasma in early lactation. Ewes given E had higher circulating insulin and increased insulin resistance, compared with sheep given L, on 2 of the 4 days of sampling during pregnancy and lactation during the treatment period. There were no treatment effects on lamb birth weight or growth but ewes given the E diet were significantly (P < 0·05, 3·3 kg) heavier than the ewes given L after 3 weeks of lactation. The results indicate that a lack of protein available for absorption in the small intestine causes reduced wool growth during late pregnancy and early lactation. Wool growth is more sensitive to a reduced protein supply than foetal growth, maternal weight or milk production.

Keywords

lactationpregnancyproteinsheepwool
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 62 , Issue 3 , June 1996 , pp. 497 - 506
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, N. R., Briegel, J. R., Rigby, R. D. G., Sanders, M. R. and Hoskinson, R. M. 1996. Responses of sheep to annual cycles in nutrition. 1. Role of endogenous growth hormone during undernutrition. Animal Science 62:279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, S. and Adams, N. R. 1988. Adrenal glands alter the concentration of oestradiol-17β and its receptor in the uterus of ovariectomized ewes. Journal of Endocrinology 118 375–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ballard, F. J., Francis, G. L., Walton, P. E., Knowles, S. E., Owens, P. C., Read, L. C. and Tomas, F. M. 1993. Modification of animal growth with growth hormone and insulin-like growth factors. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44:567–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basset, J. M. 1963. The influence of cortisol on food intake and glucose metabolism in sheep. Journal of Endocrinology 26:539–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergen, W. G. 1979. Free amino acids in blood of ruminants — physiological and nutritional regulation. Journal of Animal Science 49:1577–1589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brockman, R. P. and Laarveld, B. 1986. Hormonal regulation of metabolism in ruminants; a review. Livestock Production Science 14:313–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, F. and Briggs, G. M. 1990. The nutritive value of eggs. In Egg science and technology (ed. Stadelman, W. J.Cotterill, O. J.), 3rd edition. Food Products Press, New York.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. and Hosking, B. J. 1992. Nutritional value of grain legumes for ruminants. Nutrition Research Reviews 5:19–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faichney, G. J. and White, G. A. 1983. Methods for the analysis offeeds eaten by ruminants. CSIRO Divison of Production, Blacktown.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. G. and Wilkins, J. F. 1982. The accuracy of ultrasonic imaging with real time scanners in determining litter number in pregnant ewes. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 14:636.Google Scholar
Hill, G. D. 1977. The composition and nutritive value of lupin seed. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, B:Livestock and Feeding 47:511–529.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P. and Wheeler, J. L. 1968. The dyebanding and tattooed patch procedures for estimating wool production and obtaining samples for the measurement of fibre diameter. Australian journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 8:265–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobley, G. E. 1994. Amino acid and protein metabolism in the whole body and individual tissues of ruminants. In Principles of protein nutrition of ruminants (ed. Asplund, J. M.), pp. 147–178. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton.Google Scholar
McCann, J. P., Reimers, T. J. and Bergman, E. N. 1987. Glucose-dose dependent characteristics of insulin secretion in obese and lean sheep. Endocrinology 121:553–560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masters, D. G., Ralph, I. G. and Kelly, R. W. 1992. Wool growth from reproducing ewes. In Management for wool quality in Mediterranean environments (ed. Doyle, P. T., Fortune, J. A. and Adams, N. R.), pp. 142–148. Department of Agriculture of Western Australia, Perth.Google Scholar
Masters, D. G. and Stewart, C. A. 1990. Wool growth and reproduction. In Reproductive physiology of merino sheep, concepts and consequences (ed. Oldham, C. M., Martin, G. B. and Purvis, I. W.), pp. 265–274. School of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth.Google Scholar
Masters, D. G., Stewart, C. A. and Connell, P. J. 1993. Changes in plasma amino acid patterns and wool growth during pregnancy and lactation in the ewe. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44:945–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, D. J. 1987. Nutritional effects on the foetus and mammary gland during pregnancy. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 46:249–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellor, D. J., Flint, D. J., Vernon, R. G. and Forsyth, I. A. 1987. Relationships between plasma hormone concentrations, udder development and the production of early mammary secretions in twin-bearing ewes on different planes of nutrition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 72:345–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Technical bulletin 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Oddy, V. H. 1985. Wool growth in pregnant and lactating Merino ewes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 105:613–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oddy, V. H. and Lindsay, D. B. 1986. Metabolic and hormonal interactions and their potential effects on growth. In Control and manipulation of animal growth (ed. Buttery, P. J., Lindsay, D. B. and Haynes, N. B.), pp.231–248. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, P. J. 1979. Effects of amino acids on the growth and properties of wool. In Environmental and physiological limitations to wool growth (ed. Black, J. L. and Reis, P. J.), pp.223–242. University of New England Publishing Unit, Armidale.Google Scholar
Reis, P. J. 1992. Effects of abomasal protein and energy supply on wool growth in Merino sheep. Australian journal of Agricultural Research 43:1353–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. J. 1983. Nutrition of the pregnant ewe. In Sheep production (ed. Haresign, W.), pp.111–131. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J. 1990. Nutrition in the reproduction of farm animals. Nutrition Research Reinews 3:253–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, J. J. and Forbes, T. J. 1968. The effect of protein intake during gestation on ewe and lamb performance. Animal Production 10:297–309.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J., McDonald, I., Brown, D. S. and Fraser, C. 1985. Studies on reproduction in prolific ewes. 8. The concentrations and rates of accretion of amino acids in the foetuses. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 105:21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, C. A., Masters, D., Gv Williams, I. H. and Connell, P. J. 1993. Changes in plasma amino acid patterns and wool growth in response to abomasal injections of amino acids during late pregnancy and early lactation. Australian journal of Agricultural Research 44:959–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thordarson, G., McDowell, G. H., Smith, S. V., Iley, S. and Forsyth, I. A. 1987. Effects of continuous intravenous infusion of an ovine placental extract enriched in placental lactogen on plasma hormones, metabolites and metabolite biokinetics in non-pregnant sheep. Journal of Endocrinology 113:277–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, R. J. 1994. Amino acid and protein synthesis, turnover and breakdown by ruminal microorganisms. In Principles of protein nutrition of ruminants (ed. Asplund, J. M.), pp. 71–111. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton.Google Scholar
Wheeler, J. L., Reardon, T. F., Hedges, D. A. and Rocks, R. L. 1971. The contribution of the conceptus to weight change in pregnant Merino ewes at pasture. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 76:347–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, L., Hill, M., Welna, J. P. and Birkenbeuel, G. K. 1992. Systat for Windows: statistics. Version 5 edition. Systat, Inc., Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
Williams, A. J., Murison, R. and Padgett, J. 1988. Metabolism of sulfur-containing amino acids by pregnant Merino ewes. Australian Journal of Biological Science 41:247–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, A. J., Tyrell, R. N. and Gilmour, A. R. 1978. Effects on wool production during pregnancy and lactation of twice daily abomasal supplementation with casein or methionine and cystine. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 18:52–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar