Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T07:21:58.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the effect of dentition and age in sheep on the intake of herbage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. E. Newton  and
Caroline Jackson
J. E. Newton
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
Caroline Jackson
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
Get access

Abstract

The intake of ten 5-year-old Masham ewes with good teeth, five 7-year-old Mashams with poor teeth and nine 10-year-old ewes with poor teeth was measured when they were offered long (35·1 cm) or short grass (3·8 cm) outdoors or poor quality hay indoors. The young ewes ate significantly more grass and hay than the old ewes, but the difference in daily intake was greater with long grass (1473 v. 751 g organic matter per head) and with hay (895 v. 421) than with short grass (617 v. 407). The intermediate age ewes ate as much of the long grass and of the hay as the young ewes, but less of the short grass. This suggests that age influenced intake more than did tooth condition, except when short grass was offered.

Within the oldest but not within the intermediate group of ewes, there was a significant correlation between the number of incisors and organic matter intake, except with the long grass, but there was no correlation between the number of cheek teeth and intake. When offered hay, the only group with a reduced in vivo digestibility was the intermediate group of ewes, the other two groups having a similar digestibility.

There was no correlation between number of incisors or number of molars and in vivo digestibility.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , August 1983 , pp. 133 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Coop, I. E. and Abrahamson, M. 1973. Effect of teeth condition on intake of grazing sheep. N.Z. J. Exp. Agric. 1: 58–64.Google Scholar
Freund, J. E. 1973. Modern Elementary Statistics. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. and Rodrigues, J. M. 1971. The measurement of herbage intake in grazing studies. A. Rep. Grassld Res. Inst., 1970, pp. 132–140.Google Scholar
Milne, J. A., Maxwell, T. J. and Souter, W. 1981. Effect of supplementary feeding and herbage mass on the intake and performance of grazing ewes in early lactation. Arum. Prod. 32: 185–195.Google Scholar
Newton, J. E. and Jackson, Caroline. 1981. The effect of age on ewe performance and tooth loss. A. Rep. Grassld Res. Inst., 1980, pp. 99–100.Google Scholar
Newton, J. E. and Orr, R. J. 1981. The intake of silage and grazed herbage by Masham ewes with single or twin lambs and its repeatability during pregnancy, lactation and after weaning. Anim. Prod. 13: 121–127.Google Scholar
Pearce, G. R. and Moir, R. J. 1964. Rumination in sheep. 1. The influence of rumination and grinding upon the passage and digestion of food. Aust. J. agric. Res. 15: 635–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar