Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T12:01:16.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on effect of inbreeding on production traits in pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

K. Christensen
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Genetics, Agricultural University, Bülowsvej 13, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
P. Jensen
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Genetics, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Bülowsvej 13, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
J. N. Jørgensen
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Genetics, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Bülowsvej 13, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
Get access

Abstract

Pigs with inbreeding coefficients, ranging from 0·125 to 0·375 were analysed for effect of inbreeding on daily carcass gain, body length and meat proportion in the carcass. The foundation animals were back crosses of a Landrace boar of his daughters which were Yorkshire Landrace hybrids. The statistical model included effect of sex and slaughter weight in addition to the effect of inbreeding. A statistically significant effect of inbreeding on daily carcass gain was found with a linear decline of 1·6 g for 0·1 increase in inbreeding coefficient. There was no effect of inbreeding on body length and meat proportion. Carcass weight had a highly significant effect on body length and daily carcass gain. Effect of sex was statistically significant for meat proportion only.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bereskin, B. 1989. Inbreeding and crossbreeding effect on feed efficiency in swine. In Genetics of swine (ed. Young, L. D.) USA.Google Scholar
Craft, W. A. 1953. Results of swine breeding research. US Department of Agriculture Circular 916.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Scientific and Technical, London.Google Scholar
Fredholm, M., Winterø, A. K., Christensen, K., Kristensen, B., Nielsen, P. B., Davies, W. and Archibald, A. 1993. Characterization of 24 porcine (dA-dC)n-(dT-dG)n microsatellites: genotyping of unrelated animals from four breeds and linkage studies. Mammalian Genome 4: 187192.Google Scholar
Glodek, P. 1970. Zuchtverfahren zur Ausnutzung der Heterosis und ihre Anvendung in der Schweinezucht. Zeitschrift fur Tierzüchtung Züchtungsbiologie 86: 273288.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. K. 1989. Inbreeding effect on reproduction, growth rate and carcass traits. In Genetics of swine (ed. Young, L. D.). USA.Google Scholar
King, J. W. B. and Roberts, R. C. 1959. The effects of inbreeding on carcass traits in the bacon pig. Animal Production 1: 123127.Google Scholar
Magee, W. T. 1964. Interaction between the effects of sex and inbreeding on 154-day weight in Yorkshire swine. Journal of Animal Science 23: 444446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikami, H., Fredeen, H. T. and Sather, A. P. 1977. Mass selection in a pig population. 2. The effects of inbreeding within the selected populations. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 57: 627634.Google Scholar
Takahashi, H., Christian, L. L., Rothschild, M. F., Harville, D. A. and Sugimoto, T. 1991. Estimates of inbreeding depression of growth and backfat of Duroc pigs. Animal Science and Technology 62: 323329.Google Scholar
Witt, M., Schröder, J. and Rappen, W. H. 1966. Ein Beitrag zur Frage des Einflusses der Inzucht auf die Leistungseigenschaften beim Schwein. Zeitschrift fur Tierzüchtung Züchtungsbiologie 82: 358369.Google Scholar