Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:19:48.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maternal and lamb carrier effects of the Booroola gene on food intake, growth and carcass quality of male lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

A. H. Visscher ,
M. Dijkstra ,
E. A. Lord ,
R. Süss ,
H.-J. Rösler ,
K. Heylen  and
R. F. Veerkamp
A. H. Visscher
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Science and Health, 8200AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
M. Dijkstra
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Science and Health, 8200AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
E. A. Lord
Affiliation:
Invermay Agricultural Centre, Mosgiel, New Zealand
R. Süss
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry with Veterinary Clinic, 0610 8 Halle, Germany
H.-J. Rösler
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry with Veterinary Clinic, 0610 8 Halle, Germany
K. Heylen
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry with Veterinary Clinic, 0610 8 Halle, Germany
R. F. Veerkamp
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Science and Health, 8200AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

Possible correlated or pleiotropic effects on food intake, growth rate and carcass traits (meat quality and carcass composition traits) were investigated for the prolificacy related Booroola gene (FecB). This gene was introgressed in a Texel sheep population by systematic backcrossing with sires carrying the Booroola gene. In a 3-year experiment 273 spring-born male lambs were offered concentrates ad libitum, after weaning. Lamb carrier effects and dam carrier effects for the FecB gene were estimated, accounting for year, backcross generation, slaughter weight, weaning age, concentrate type, rearing code, age of the dam and litter size as fixed effects. Carriers of the FecB had a higher dressing percentage (+1·15%), longissimus muscle depth (+0·26 mm to +0·7 5mm) and cross-sectional area (+0·98 cm2). However the gene also had a positive effect on subcutaneous fatness (+0·12 points), KKCF (+30 g) and a substantial positive lamb carrier effect on carcass fat tissue content (+3·09%), which reflects a relative increase in fatness of 11·9%. The FecB gene had also very small, significant effects on some meat colour traits. The dam carrier effects of the Booroola gene were negatively associated with food efficiency and with longissimus muscle depth (–1·38 to –2·25 mm). The increased fatness of lambs could imply that for optimal use of FecB, non-carrier terminal sires should be used on heterozygous dams.

Keywords

Booroolacarcass qualitymajor genessheep
Type
Breeding and genetics
Information
Animal Science , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , October 2000 , pp. 209 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amer, P.R., McEwan, J. C., Dodds, K. G. and Davis, G. H. 1999. Economic values for ewe prolificacy and lamb survival in New Zealand sheep. Livestock Production Science 58: 75–90.Google Scholar
Boccard, R., Buchter, L., Casteels, E., Cosentino, E., Dransfield, E., Hood, D. E., Joseph, R. L., Macdorgall, D. G., Rhodes, D. N., Schön, I., Tinbergen, B. J. and Touraille, C. 1981. Procedures for measuring meat quality characteristics in beef production experiments. Report of working group in the Commission of the European Communities’ (CEC) Beef Production Research Programme. Livestock Production Science 8: 385–397.Google Scholar
Chrystall, B. B., Culioli, J., Demeyer, D., Honikel, K. O., Moller, A. J., Purslow, P., Schwägele, F., Shorthouse, R. and Mytterhagen, L. 1994. Recommendations of the reference methods for assessment of meat tenderness. ICoMST S. V06, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Courot, M., Pisselet, M. T. and Hochereau-de Reviers, M. T. 1990. Testicular development and Sertoli cell population in Booroola rams. Second international workshop on major genes for reproduction in sheep, Toulouse, France, pp. 253–255.Google Scholar
Elsen, J. M., Bodin, L. and Thimonier, J. 1990. Major genes for reproduction in sheep. Second international Booroola workshop, Toulouse, France, July 16-18.Google Scholar
European Economic Community. 1993a. Council regulation no. 2137/92. Concerning the Community scale for the classification of carcasses of ovine animals and determining the Community standard quality of fresh or chilled sheep carcasses and extending regulation (EEC) no. 338/91. European Economic Community, Brussels, 23 July 1993.Google Scholar
European Economic Community. 1993b. Council regulation no. 461/93. Laying down detailed rules for the Community scale for the classification of carcasses of ovine animals. European Economic Community, Brussels, 26 February 1993.Google Scholar
Fahmy, M. H., Boucher, J. M., Poste, L. M., Gregoire, R., Butler, G. and Comeau, J. E. 1992. Feed efficiency, carcass characteristics and sensory quality of lamb, with or without prolific ancestry, fed diets with different protein supplements. Journal of Animal Science 70: 1365–1374.Google Scholar
Fisher, A. V. and Boer, H. de. 1994. The EAAP standard method of sheep carcass assessment. Carcass measurements and dissection procedures. Report of the EAAP Working Group on Carcass Evaluation in co-operation with the CIHEAM Institutio Agronomico Mediterranico of Zaragossa and the CEC Directorate General for Agriculture in Brussels. Livestock Production Science 38: 149–159.Google Scholar
GENSTAT 5 Committee. 1992. GENSTAT 5, release 3·1. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Hertfordshire, UK.Google Scholar
Kleemann, D. O., Ponzoni, R. W., Stafford, J. E., Cutten, I. N. and Grimson, R. J. 1985. Growth and carcass characters of South Australian Merino and its crosses with the Booroola and Trangie Fertility Merino. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 25: 750–757.Google Scholar
Kleemann, D. O., Ponzoni, R. W., Stafford, J. E. and Grimson, R. J. 1988. Carcass composition of the South Australian Merino and its crosses with the Booroola and Trangie Fertility Merino. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 28: 167–171.Google Scholar
Lord, E. A., Davis, G. H., Dodds, K. G., Henry, H. M., Lumsden, J. M. and Montgomery, G. W. 1998. Identification of Booroola carriers using microsatellite markers. Proceedings of the sixth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Armidale, vol. 27, pp. 19–22.Google Scholar
Montgomery, G. W., McNatty, K. P. and Davis, G. H. 1992. Physiology and molecular genetics of mutations that increase ovulation rate in sheep. Endocrine Reviews 13: 309–320.Google Scholar
More O’Ferrall, G. J. and Timon, V. M. 1977. A comparison of eight sire breeds for lamb production. Irish Journal of Agrilcultural Research 16: 277–284.Google Scholar
Mulsant, P., Schibler, L., Lecerf, F., Riquet, J., Chitour, N., Eggen, A., Cribu, E., Lanneluc, I. and Elsen, J. M. 1998. Regional mapping of the Fecb (Booroola) region of sheep chromosome 6. Animal Genetics 29: (suppl. 1) 36–37.Google Scholar
Nieuwhof, G. J., Visscher, A. H., Engel, B., Werf, J. H. J. van der, Jong, F. H. de and Dijkstra, M. 1998. Identification of early predictors of carriers of the Booroola gene in sheep using a mixed inheritance model. Animal Science 67: 317–325.Google Scholar
Piper, L. R. and Bindon, B. M. 1982. The Booroola Merino and the performance of medium non-peppin crosses at Armidale. In The Boroola Merino (ed. Piper, L. R., Bindon, B. M. and Nethery, R. D.), pp. 9–19. Division of Animal Production, CSIRO, Australia.Google Scholar
Price, C. A., Hudson, N. L. and McNatty, K. P. 1990. Difference in LH and FSH secretion in adult rams with respect to the Booroola fecundity gene. In Major genes for reproduction in sheep (ed. Elsen, J. M., Bodin, L. and Thimonier, J.). Second international Booroola workshop, Toulouse, France, July 16-18, pp. 215–225.Google Scholar
Visscher, A. H. 1974. A crossbreeding and selection experiment with three breeds of sheep. Proceedings of a working symposium on breed evaluation and cross breeding experiments, Boogaert, Zeist (ed. Minkema, D., Cöp, W. A. G., Visscher, A. H. and Adrichem, D. H. van), pp. 475–491.Google Scholar
Visscher, A. H. and Bekedam, M. 1984. Development of the Texel breed in The Netherlands. Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, The Hague, vol. S4·1, p. 31.Google Scholar
Visscher, A. H. and Dijkstra, M. 1996. Effect of Booroola gene on carcass and meat quality. In Book of abstracts of the 47th annual meeting of the European Association for Animal Production (ed. Arendonk, J. A. M. van), p. 222.Google Scholar
Visscher, A. H., Haandel, E. B. P. G. van and Jong, F. H. de. 1990. Influence of Booroola F-gene on reproduction, growth and carcass characteristics in a Texel flock. In Major genes for reproduction in sheep (ed. Elsen, J. M., Bodin L., L. and Thimonier, J.). Second international Booroola workshop, Toulouse, France, July 16-18, pp. 391–396.Google Scholar
Wolf, B. T., Smith, C. and Sales, D. I. 1980. Growth and carcass composition in the cross-bred progeny of six terminal sire breeds of sheep. Animal Production 31: 307–313.Google Scholar