Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T02:50:41.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investment appraisal for national breeding programmes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

W. G. Hill
W. G. Hill
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh EH9 3JN
Get access

Summary

The discounted cash flow procedure of management accounting is used to evaluate national breeding programmes. Alternative methods of improvement of meat production from cattle born in the dairy herd are taken as examples. These schemes utilize selection for beef characters either in the dairy breed itself or within a beef breed, maintained in a small herd and used as a source of bulls for crossing by AI. In each case young bulls are selected for growth rate in a performance test, which precedes the progeny test for milk production in the dairy breed.

Greater rates of genetic progress and monetary returns are predicted from improvement of the beef breed, but both schemes are expected to yield a return on investment of over 15%. The net returns from the programme in the beef breed are influenced less by changes in assumptions.

Approximate, but simple, methods of computing the discounted returns are described.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , February 1971 , pp. 37 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Kinks, C. J. M. 1970a. The selection of dairy bulls for AI. Anim. Prod. 12: 569–576.Google Scholar
Hinks, C. J. M. 1970b. Performance test procedures for meat production amongst dairy bulls used in AI. Anim. Prod.. 12: 577–583.Google Scholar
House of Commons (1967–1968). Select Committee on Nationalised Industries. 1st report, Pp. 1–22 (H.C. 371).Google Scholar
Lindhé, B. 1968. Model simulation of A.I. breeding within a dual purpose breed of cattle. Acta Agrie, scand. 18: 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poutous, M. and Vissac, B. 1962. Recherche théorique des conditions de rentabilité maximum de l'pépreuve de descendance des taureaux d'insémination artificielle. Ann. Zootech. 11: 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, S. R. 1961. Estimating herd improvement from selection programs. J. Dairy Sci. 44: 1103–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. 1969. Optimum selection procedures in animal breeding. Anlm. Prod. 11: 433–442.Google Scholar
Soller, M., Bar-Anan, R. and Pasternak, H. 1966. Selection of dairy cattle for growth rate and milk production. Anim. Prod. 8: 109–119.Google Scholar
Turner, H. N. and Young, S. S. Y. 1969. Quantitative Genetics and Sheep Breeding. Macmillan, Melbourne.Google Scholar