Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T20:44:09.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic parameters and evaluations for somatic cell counts and its relationship with production and type traits in some dairy breeds in the United Kingdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. A. Mrode ,
G. J. T. Swanson  and
M. S. Winters
R. A. Mrode
Affiliation:
Animal Data Centre Ltd, Fox Talbot House, Greenways Business Park, Chippenham SN15 1BN
G. J. T. Swanson
Affiliation:
Animal Data Centre Ltd, Fox Talbot House, Greenways Business Park, Chippenham SN15 1BN
M. S. Winters
Affiliation:
Cogent, Woodhouse Farm, Aldford, Chester CHS 6JD
Get access

Abstract

Somatic cell count (SCO data collected on individual cows since 1991 were obtained from National Milk Records. Following validation genetic and phenotypic parameters were estimated from the lactation average SCCfor 63 424 Holstein/Friesian (HOD, 7966 Ayrshire (AYR) and 14 509 Jersey (JER) animals. The first three lactations were included in the analyses. The heritabilities (h2) for first lactation log SCC (LSCC) were 0·11 (s.e. 0·01), 0·12 (s.e. 0·02) and 0·09 (s.e. 0·03) for the HOL, JER and AYR breeds respectively. Estimates for herd sire interaction (c2) effects ranged from 0·01 to 0·02. Analysis of the first three lactations with a repeatability model produced similar h2 and c2 estimates. Permanent environment estimates ranged from 0·21 to 0·25. Heritabilities of individual test day LSCC ranged from 0·04 (s.e. 0·02) to 0·10 (s.e. 0·03). Genetic correlations between SCC and milk, fat and protein yield for the HOL breed were 0·06 (s.e. 0·05), 0·14 (s.e. 0·06) and 0·09 (s.e. 0·06) respectively. Genetic evaluations were obtained for 666 595 and 9136 animals for Holsteins and Ayrshires, providing evaluations on 13 525 and 1713 bulls respectively in each breed. The range of LSCC predicted transmitting abilities (PTA) was ±25% although the proportion of bulls with reliability > 0·50 was low at 0·17 and 0-05 for HOL and AYR respectively. The correlations between the LSCC PTAs for HOL bulls with at least 50 daughters and their genetic evaluations for linear type were essentially zero for body and some udder traits. Significant negative correlations were obtained for a number of traits including foot angle (0·14), fore-udder attachment (0·19) and udder depth (0·19) and a positive correlation for teat length (0·15). SCC evaluations will be implemented by the Animal Data Centre. Reliabilities will be lower than production because of the lower h2 for SCC and the lower progeny group size since only 0·80 of recorded cows have SCC records.

Keywords

dairy cattlegenetic parametersproductionsomatic cell count
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , June 1998 , pp. 569 - 576
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali, A. K. A. and Shook, G. E. 1980. An optimum transformation for somatic cell concentration in milk. Journal of Dairy Science 63: 487–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Animal Data Centre. 1996. UK statistics for genetic evaluation (DAIRY).Google Scholar
Banos, G. and Shook, G. E. 1990. Genotype by environment interaction and genetic correlations among parities for somatic cell count and milk yield. Journal of Dairy Science 73: 2563–2573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Booth, J. M. 1988. Progress in controlling mastitis in England and Wales. Veterinary Record 122: 299–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coffey, E. M., Vinson, W. E. and Pearson, R. E. 1986. Potential of somatic cell concentration in milk as a sire selection criterion to reduce mastitis in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 2163–2172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Da, Y., Grossman, M., Misztal, I. and Wiggans, G. R. 1992. Estimation of genetic parameters for somatic cell score in Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 2265–2271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heuven, H. C. M., Bovenhuis, H. and Politiek, R. D. 1988. Inheritance of somatic cell count and its genetic relationship with milk yield in different parities. Livestock Production Science 18: 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jong, G. de and Lansbergen, L. 1996. Udder health index: selection for mastitis resistance. Proceedings of an international workshop on genetic improvement of functional traits in cattle, Gembloux, Belgium. Interbull Bulletin 12: 42–47.Google Scholar
Monardes, H. G. and Hayes, J. F. 1985. Genetic and phenotypic statistics of lactation cell counts in different lactations of Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 1449–1455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monardes, H. G., Hayes, J. F. and Moxley, J. E. 1984. Heritability of lactation cell count measures and their relationships with milk yield and composition in Ayrshire cows. Journal of Dairy Science 67: 2429–2435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mrode, R. A. and Swanson, G. J. T. 1995. A comparison of the efficiency of the repeatability model on observed or transformed yields to a multi-variate analysis. Animal Science 60: 545–546 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Mrode, R. A. and Swanson, G. J. T. 1996. Genetic and statistical properties of somatic cell count and its suitability as an indirect means of reducing the incidence of mastitis in dairy cattle. Animal Breeding Abstracts 64: 195–205.Google Scholar
Philipsson, J., Ral, G. and Berglund, B. 1995. Somatic cell count as a selection criterion for mastitis resistance in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 41: 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reents, R., Jamrozik, J., Schaeffer, L. R. and Dekkers, J. C. M. 1995. Estimation of genetic parameters for test day records of somatic cell score. Journal of Dairy Science 78: 2847–2857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, G. W. 1993. Index selection using milk yield, somatic cell score, udder depth, teat placement, and foot angle. Journal of Dairy Science 76: 664–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, G. W., Hargrove, G. L., Lawlor, T. J. Jr and Ebersole, J. L. 1991. Correlations among linear type traits and somatic cell counts. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 1087–1091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schutz, M. M., Hansen, L. B., Steuernagel, G. R., Reneau, J. K. and Kuck, A. L. 1990. Genetic parameters for somatic cells, protein and fat in milk of Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 73: 494–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, M. M., VanRaden, P. M., Boettcher, P. J. and Hansen, L. B. 1993. Relationship of somatic cell score and linear type trait evaluations of Holstein sires. Journal of Dairy Science 76: 658–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, M. M., VanRaden, P. M. and Wiggans, G. R. 1995. Genetic variation in lactation means of somatic cell scores for six breeds of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 77: 284–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shook, G. E., Ruvuna, F. and Ali, A. K. A. 1982. Genetic parameters for lactation average of somatic cell concentration in milk. Proceedings of the second world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Madrid, vol. viii, 142–147.Google Scholar
Strandberg, E. and Shook, G. E. 1989. Genetic and economic responses to breeding programmes that consider mastitis, journal of Dairy Science 72: 2136–2142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VanRaden, P. M. and Wiggans, G. R. 1991. Derivation, calculation, and use of national animal model information. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 2737–2746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visscher, P. M., Hill, W. H. and Thompson, R. 1992. Univariate and multivariate parameter estimates for milk production traits using an animal model. II. Efficiency of selection when using simplified covariance structures. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 24: 431–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visscher, P. M. and Thompson, R. 1992. Univariate and multivariate parameter estimates for milk production traits using an animal model. I. Description and results of REML analyses. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 24: 415–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, J. I., Saran, A. and Zeliger, Y. 1992. Genetic and environmental relationships among somatic cell count, bacterial infection, and clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 2532–2540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welper, R. D. and Freeman, A. E. 1992. Genetic parameters for yield traits of Holstein including lactose and somatic cell score. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 1342–1348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, W. C, Dekkers, J. C. M., Banos, G. and Burnside, E. B. 1994. Adjustment factors and genetic evaluation for somatic cell score and relationships with other traits of Canadian Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 77: 659–665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed