Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T06:05:30.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Energy supplementation of silage for ewes in late pregnancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

W. Sheehan  and
M. J. Lawlor
W. Sheehan
Affiliation:
Animal Production Unit, The Agricultural Institute, Creagh, Ballinrobe, Co. Mayo, Ireland
M. J. Lawlor
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition and Biochemistry Department, The Agricultural Institute, Dunsinea, Castleknock, Co. Dublin, Ireland
Get access

Summary

1. Four groups of 20 ewes were individually fed in late pregnancy on: (1) silage ad libitum, (2) silage ad libitum and 12 kg rolled barley, (3) silage ad libitum and 23 kg rolled barley, (4) pelleted milled dried grass ad libitum. The concentrate was offered on a rising plane over the last 6 weeks of pregnancy. After parturition the ewes and lambs were put on spring pasture.

2. The intake of silage by twin-bearing ewes fell slightly but nonsignificantly during week 16 of pregnancy but thereafter remained steady up to lambing. There was no other decline in intake on any of the treatments. Barley, however, significantly depressed silage intake when the quantity was increased above 282 g per day.

3. Single-bearing ewes, except those on treatment 1, gained in net body weight during late pregnancy. Twin-bearing ewes on treatment 4 gained in net body weight while those on the other treatments lost weight.

4. Birth weights of single lambs from ewes on treatment 1 were significantly lower than those from treatment 3. This was the only significant difference in birth weight or subsequent growth rates of single lambs. Birth weights of twin lambs on treatment 1 were significantly lower than those on the other treatments.

5. The birth weight of twin lambs appeared to be an important determinant of subsequent performance, and may thus be a valuable criterion of the adequacy of the ewe's diet in late pregnancy.

6. With medium-quality autumn silages, 12 kg of barley given during late pregnancy is sufficient to ensure good reproductive performance in ewes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , August 1972 , pp. 29 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. 1957. The effects of defective nutrition during pregnancy in farm livestock. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 16: 52–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. McC. and Wainman, F. W. 1956. Some observations on the digestibility of food by sheep, and on related problems. Br. J. Nutr. 10: 69–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncombe, W. G. 1964. The colorimetric micro-determination of non-esterifled fatty acids in plasma. Clinica. chim. Acta 9: 122–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, J. Z. and Greenhalgh, J. F. D. 1970. A note on the relation between weights of alimentary tract contents, body fat and the uterus in Blackface ewes. Anim. Prod. 12: 669–671.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M. 1970. The voluntary food intake of pregnant and lactating ruminants: a review. Br. vet. J. 126: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makela, A. 1956. Studies on the question of bulk in the nutrition of farm animals with special reference to cattle. Acta agralia fennica 85: 1–130.Google Scholar
Nolan, T. and Conway, A. 1969. Fat lamb production in the West of Ireland. 1. Effects of two stocking rates on lamb growth rate and on production of lamb carcass meat and wool per acre. Ir. J. agric. Res. 8: 249–259.Google Scholar
Reid, R. L. and Hinks, N. T. 1962. Studies on the carbohydrate metabolism of sheep. 17. Feed requirements and voluntary feed intake in late pregnancy, with particular reference to prevention of hypoglycaemia and hyperketonaemia. Aust. J. agric. Res. 13: 1092–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Doney, J. M. and Reid, R. L. 1967. The use of biochemical parameters in controlling nutritional state in pregnant ewes, and the effect of undernourishment during pregnancy on lamb birth weight. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 68: 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, W. and Ait-Ken, F. C. 1959. Diet in relation to reproduction and the viability of the young. Pt. II. Sheep. World survey of reproduction and review of feeding experiments. Tech. Commun. Commonw. Bur. Anim. Nutr., No. 20.Google Scholar
Thomson, W. and Fraser, A. H. H. 1939. Feeding concentrates to the in-lamb ewe. The effects in lambing results. Scott. J. Agric. 22: 71–73.Google Scholar
Thomson, A. M. and Thomson, W. 1949. Lambing in relation to the diet of the pregnant ewe. Br.J.Nutr. 1: 290–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L. R. 1948. The growth of lambs before and after birth in relation to the level of nutrition. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 38: 93–153, 243-302, 367-401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar