Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:02:53.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of synchronizing the rate of dietary energy and nitrogen supply to the rumen on milk production and metabolism of ewes offered grass silage based diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

M. W. Witt ,
L. A. Sinclair ,
R. G. Wilkinson  and
P. J. Buttery
M. W. Witt*
Affiliation:
Animal Science Research Centre, School of Agriculture, Harper Adams University College, Edgmond, Newport TF10 8NB, UK
L. A. Sinclair
Affiliation:
Animal Science Research Centre, School of Agriculture, Harper Adams University College, Edgmond, Newport TF10 8NB, UK
R. G. Wilkinson
Affiliation:
Animal Science Research Centre, School of Agriculture, Harper Adams University College, Edgmond, Newport TF10 8NB, UK
P. J. Buttery
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Division of Nutritional Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK
*
†Present address: Trident Feeds, PO Box 11, Oundle Road, Peterborough PE2 9QX, UK
Get access

Abstract

Twenty-four multiparous ewes were used to test the hypothesis that synchronizing the hourly rate of release of energy and nitrogen in the rumen would optimize milk production. Three diets were formulated using the in situ degradability of the food ingredients, to differ in their rate of organic matter (OM) and nitrogen (N) release in the rumen. All diets contained 400 g grass silage per kg dry matter (DM) and were predicted to have a similar content of metabolizable energy (11·8 MJ/kg DM), metabolizable protein (102 g/kg DM), neutral-detergent fibre (365 g/kg DM) and daily ratio of N: OM supply to the rumen but differ in their hourly pattern of nutrient release to be either synchronous (S), asynchronous (A) or intermediate (I). The diets were offered ad libitum as a complete feed in a 3 × 3 Latin-square design consisting of three periods each of 28 days duration. Synchronizing the hourly supply of energy and N to the rumen did not significantly alter milk or milk fat yield (g/d), milk protein content (g/kg), DM intake (kg/day), total time spent eating or the number of meals per day. However, compared with ewes offered diets I or A, those offered diet S had a lower milk fat content (g/kg; P < 0·05) whilst protein yield (g/day) tended to be increased (P = 0·05). Animals offered the synchronous diet (S) had lower plasma urea concentrations throughout the day and significantly higher beta-hydroxybutyrate concentrations at 14:00 and 18:00 h than those offered diets I or A. In conclusion, synchronizing dietary energy and N supply to the rumen did not have a major effect on milk production in ewes.

Keywords

energy consumptionewesnitrogenrumensynchronization
Type
Ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 71 , Issue 1 , August 2000 , pp. 187 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. An advisory manual prepared by the AFRC Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, UK.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J. M., Muller, L. D., Varga, G. A. and Griel, L. C. 1993. Nonstructural carbohydrate and protein effects on rumen fermentation, nutrient flow, and performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 76: 1091–1105.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1990. Official methods of analysis, 15th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
Conrad, H. R., Baile, C. A. and Mayer, J. 1977. Changing meal patterns and suppression of feed intake with increasing amounts of dietary non protein nitrogen in ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science 60: 1725–1733.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. M., Bruce, C. I., Buttery, P. J., Gill, M. and Beever, D. E. 1988. Protein metabolism in the rumen of silage-fed steers: effects of fishmeal supplementation. British Journal of Nutrition 60: 339–353.Google Scholar
Dowman, M. G. and Collins, F. C. 1982. The use of enzymes to predict the digestibility of animal feeds. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 33: 689–696.Google Scholar
Fron, M., Maderia, H., Richards, C. and Morrison, M. 1996. The impact of feeding condensed distillers byproducts on rumen microbiology and metabolism. Animal Feed Science and Technology 61: 235–245.Google Scholar
Givens, D. I., Everington, J. M. and Adamson, A. H. 1989. The digestibility and ME content of grass silage and their prediction from laboratory measurements. Animal Feed Science and Technology 24: 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, F. J. and Small, J. C. 1990. The direct and residual effects of giving fish meal to dairy cows receiving differing levels of concentrate supplementation in addition to grass silage. Animal Production 51: 449–460.Google Scholar
Henderson, A. R., Garnsworthy, P. C., Newbold, J. R. and Buttery, P. J. 1998. The effect of asynchronous diets on the function of the rumen in the lactating dairy cow. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 1998, p. 19.Google Scholar
Herrera-Saldana, R. E. and Huber, J. T. 1989. Influence of varying protein and starch degradabilities on performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 1477–1483.Google Scholar
Holder, P., Buttery, P. J. and Garnsworthy, P. C. 1995. The effect of dietary asynchrony on rumen nitrogen recycling in sheep. Animal Science 60: 528 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Hoover, W. H. and Stokes, S. R. 1991. Balancing carbohydrate and protein for optimum rumen microbial yield. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3630–3644.Google Scholar
Huhtanen, P. 1987. The effects of intra-ruminal infusions of sucrose and xylose on the nitrogen and fibre digestion in the rumen of cattle receiving diets of grass silage and barley. Journal of Agricultural Science in Finland 59: 405–424.Google Scholar
Huntingdon, J. A. and Givens, I. 1995. The in situ technique for studying the rumen degradation of feeds: a review of the procedure. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews (Series B) 65: 63–93.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. R. 1976. Influence of carbohydrate solubility on non-protein nitrogen utilization in the ruminant. Journal of Animal Science 43: 184–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khalili, H. and Huhtanen, P. 1991a. Sucrose supplements in cattle given grass silage based diets. 1. Digestion of organic matter and nitrogen. Animal Feed Science and Technology 33: 247–261.Google Scholar
Khalili, H. and Huhtanen, P. 1991b. Sucrose supplements in cattle given grass silage based diets. 2. Digestion of cell wall carbohydrates. Animal Feed Science and Technology 33: 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolver, E., Muller, L. D., Varga, G. A. and Cassidy, T.J. 1998. Synchronization of ruminal degradation of supplemental carbohydrate with pasture nitrogen in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 2017–2028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1990. >GENSTAT 5 Committee of the Statistics Department, Rothamstead Experimental Station Oxford University Press, Oxford.GENSTAT+5+Committee+of+the+Statistics+Department,+Rothamstead+Experimental+Station+Oxford+University+Press,+Oxford.>Google Scholar
Miettinen, H. and Huhtanen, P. 1996. Effects of the ratio of ruminal propionate to butyrate on milk yield and blood metabolites in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 79: 841–861.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1981. Reference booklet 427. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. J., Connolly, J. F. and McNeill, G. P. 1995. Effects on milk fat composition and cow performance of feeding concentrates containing full fat rapeseed and maize distillers grains on grass-silage based diets. Livestock Production Science 44: 1–11.Google Scholar
Ngongoni, N. T., Robinson, J. J., Aitken, R. P. and Fraser, C. 1989. Efficiency of utilization during pregnancy and lactation in the ewe of the protein reaching the abomasum and truly digested in the small intestine. Animal Production 49: 249–265.Google Scholar
Peart, J. N. 1967. The effect of different levels of nutrition during late pregnancy on the subsequent milk production of Blackface ewes and on the growth of their lambs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 68: 365–371.Google Scholar
Penning, P. D., Orr, R. J. and Treacher, T. T. 1988. Responses of lactating ewes, offered fresh herbage indoors and when grazing, to supplements containing differing protein concentrations. Animal Production 46: 403–415.Google Scholar
Phipps, R. H., Jones, A. K. and Perrot, J. G. 1998. The effect of distillery by-products and molassed sugar beet feed on feed intake and milk production of dairy cows fed a maize silage based total mixed ration. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 1998, p. 201.Google Scholar
Rhind, S. M., Bass, J. and Doney, J. M. 1992. Pattern of milk production of East Friesland and Scottish Blackface ewes and associated blood metabolite and hormone profiles. Animal Production 54: 265–273.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. M., Sinclair, L. A. and Wilkinson, R.G. 1999. The effects of sequence of feed allocation within the day on the growth and carcass characteristics of lambs fe barley based diets. Proceedings of the British Society of Anima Science, 1999, p. 27.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. H. and McQueen, R. E. 1994. Influence of supplemental protein source and feeding frequency on rumen fermentation and performance in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 77: 1340–1353.Google Scholar
Rooke, J. A., Brookes, I. M. and Armstrong, D. G. 1983. The digestion of untreated and formaldehyde treated soyabean and rapeseed meals by cattle fed a basal silage diet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100: 329–342.Google Scholar
Rooke, J. A., Lee, N. H. and Armstrong, D. G. 1987. The effects of intra-ruminal infusions of urea, casein, glucose syrup and a mixture of casein and glucose syrup on nitrogen digestion in the rumen of cattle receiving grass silage diets. British Journal of Nutrition 57: 89–98.Google Scholar
Shabi, Z., Arieli, A., Bruckental, Y., Aharoni, Y., Zamwel, S., Bor, A. and Tagari, H. 1998. Effect of synchronization of the degradation of dietary crude protein and organic matter and feeding frequency on ruminal fermentation and flow of digesta in the abomasum of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 1991–2000.Google Scholar
Sibly, R. M., Nott, H. M. R. and Fletcher, D. J. 1990. Splitting behaviour into bouts. Animal Behaviour 39: 63–69.Google Scholar
Sinclair, L. A., Garnsworthy, P. C., Newbold, J. and Buttery, P. J. 1993. Effect of synchronizing the rate of dietary energy and nitrogen release on rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis in sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 120: 251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, L. A. and Scoffield, D. M. 1996. Effects of level of concentrate on eating behaviour, predicted hourly nutrient release in the rumen and performance in ewes given grass silage. Animal Science 62: 672 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1980. Statistical methods, seventh edition. Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, C. S., Paniagua, C., Dinsdale, D., Cheng, K. J. and Garrow, S. H. 1981. Selective isolation and characteristics of Bacteriodes succinogenes from the rumen of a cow. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 41: 504–510.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. and Lewis, B. A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Van Vuuren, A. M., Tamminga, S. and Ketelaar, R. S. 1990. Ruminal availability of nitrogen and carbohydrates from fresh and preserved herbage in dairy cows. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 38: 499–512.Google Scholar
Vanzant, E. S., Cochran, R. C. and Titgemeyer, E. C. 1998. Standardization of in situ techniques for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. Journal of Animal Science 76: 2717–2729.Google Scholar
Weiss, W. P., Erickson, D. O., Erickson, G. M. and Fisher, G. R. 1989. Barley distillers grains as a protein supplement for dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 980–987.Google Scholar
Witt, M. W., Sinclair, L. A., Wilkinson, R. G. and Buttery, P. J. 1999a. The effects of synchronizing the rate of dietary energy and nitrogen supply to the rumen on the production and metabolism of sheep: food characterization and growth and metabolism of ewe lambs given food ad libitum. Animal Science 69: 223–235.Google Scholar
Witt, M. W., Sinclair, L. A., Wilkinson, R. G. and Buttery, P. J. 1999b. The effects of synchronizing the rate of dietary energy and nitrogen supply to the rumen on the metabolism and growth of ram lambs given food at a restricted level. Animal Science 69: 627–636.Google Scholar