Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:52:58.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of exposure to a hot environment on Friesian and Brahman × Friesian cattle, with some measurements of the effects of exposure to radiant heat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. W. Holmes
Affiliation:
Dairy Husbandry Department, Massey University, New Zealand
C. T. King
Affiliation:
Dairy Husbandry Department, Massey University, New Zealand
P. E. L. Sauwa
Affiliation:
Dairy Husbandry Department, Massey University, New Zealand
Get access

Abstract

1. Eight calves of each of two breed types, Friesian (Fr) and Brahman × Friesian (FB), were fed ad libitum on one of two diets; the digestibility of the dry matter of the diets was 72% and 63%. Eight calves were kept at 34°C and eight at 17°C. In a second experiment six of the calves previously exposed to 34°C were subjected to daily exposures to a radiant heat load at 32°C air temperature, while fed on the diet of lower digestibility.

2. Rectal temperatures and respiratory rates were higher, and food intakes and growth rates were lower, at 34°C than at 17°C. However there was only a small difference in growth rate between the two temperatures after the effect of temperature on food intake had been removed by regression.

3. At 34°C FB calves had lower rectal temperatures and respiratory rates than Fr calves, and when fed on the diet of higher digestibility FB calves ate more and grew faster than Fr calves at both temperatures; however there were only small corresponding differences between the breed types for calves fed on the diet of lower digestibility at both temperatures.

4. At 34°C FB calves had lighter (weight) hair coats than Fr calves and FB calves had lighter coats at 34°C than at 17°C; the latter difference was not apparent for Fr calves. Nevertheless, neither rectal temperature nor respiratory rate was significantly affected for either breed by removal of the hair coat at 34°C.

5. In the second experiment the rectal temperatures of FB calves increased by smaller amounts during exposure to radiant heat than was the case for Fr calves; FB calves had faster sweating rates than Fr calves during these exposures.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bianca, W. 1959. The effect of clipping the coat on various reactions of calves to heat. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 52: 380383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W. G. and Cox, Gertrude M. 1957. Experimental Designs. 2nd ed. Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Colditz, P. J. and Kellaway, R. C. 1972. The effects of diet and heat stress on feed intake, growth, and nitrogen metabolism in Friesian, F1 Brahman × Friesian, and Brahman heifers. Aust. J. agric. Res. 23: 717725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, C. W., Hughes, T. P. and Christensen, Robyn. 1978. Energy metabolism of Brahman × Friesian and Friesian calves, and the influence of an increase in rectal temperature on their heat production. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 21: 557561.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. G. 1970. Sweating rate and the electrolyte content of skin secretions of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cross-bred cows. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 75: 397402.Google Scholar
Kellaway, R. C. and Colditz, P. J. 1975. The effect of heat stress on growth and nitrogen metabolism in Friesian and Fi Brahman × Friesian heifers. Aust. J. agric. Res. 26: 615622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, D. M. 1966. A comparison of cutaneous evaporation rates in cattle exposed to heat in a climate laboratory and in the field. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 66: 175179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleger, A. V. and Turner, H. G. 1965. Sweating rates of cattle in the field and their reaction to diurnal and seasonal changes. Aust. J. agric. Res. 16: 92106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. 1956. Statistical Methods applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Biology. 5th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Turner, H. G. 1962. Effect of clipping the coat on performance of calves in the field. Aust. J. agric. Res. 13: 180192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeates, N. T. M. 1977. The coat and heat retention in cattle: studies in the tropical maritime climate of Fiji. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 88: 223226.Google Scholar
Winchester, C. F. and Morris, M. J. 1956. Water intake rates of cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 15: 722740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar