Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T17:27:51.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of diet and stage of development on partitioning of nutrients between fat and lean deposition in steers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

N.D. Scollan ,
M.S. Dhanoa ,
E.J. Kim ,
J.M. Dawson  and
P.J. Buttery
N.D. Scollan
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, SY23 3EB, UK
M.S. Dhanoa
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, SY23 3EB, UK
E.J. Kim
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, SY23 3EB, UK
J.M. Dawson
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Biochemistry, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK
P.J. Buttery
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Biochemistry, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK
Get access

Abstract

This experiment investigated the effect of feeding grass silage alone or supplemented with additional energy and/or protein on the partitioning of nutrients between fat and lean deposition in cattle grown from approximately 140 to 550 kg. The distribution of total body fat between the main fat depots was also assessed. Ninety-two Hereford ✕ Friesian steers (140±18•8 kg initial live weight) were allocated to one of four dietary treatments; grass silage offered either alone (diet S) or supplemented with fish meal (diet FM; 150 g/kg silage dry matter (DM) intake but offered at equal estimated metabolizable energy (ME) intake to silage) or forage-concentrate diets of silage and a barley/soya (80: 20) concentrate at ratios of 70: 30 or 30: 70 on a DM basis (diets 30C and 70C, respectively). Eight animals were slaughtered at the start of the trial to determine initial carcass composition. Of the remaining 21 animals per diet, three were slaughtered at each of seven live weights ranging between 250 and 550 kg, at 50-kg intervals. Animals were given food individually and diets were offered ad libitum (except for FM) along with 100 g/day of a commercial vitamin/mineral pre-mix. At slaughter, half carcasses were minced for the determination of fat and protein content and visceral fat depots, perirenal, mesenteric and omental were removed and weighed. The relationships between chemical composition and empty body weight (EBW) at slaughter were assessed using allometric equations (loge y = loge a + b loge EBW). The composition of the silage was 271•9 g/kg toluene DM with a total nitrogen and estimated ME of 26•5 g/kg DM and 11•8 MJ/kg DM, respectively. DM intakes increased (P < 0•001) with increasing level of concentrate and this generated the expected differences in both energy and protein intake. Live-weight gains increased by proportionately about 0•1, 0•18 and 0•34 on the FM, 30C and 70C treatments, respectively, compared with the S alone. Carcass protein deposition (kg) was relatively linear across the slaughter weights 250 to 550 kg, except for the 70C treatment where the slope (shape or curvature parameter, b) was lower compared with S (P = 0•007). Carcass fat (kg) was similar between S and FM. However, at 350 kg EBW and above, the carcasses of animals given concentrate contained more fat (P < 0•01) compared with those on silage. Carcass fat deposition (kg) showed significant curvature between 200 and 500 EBW (kg) and this was most pronounced for the concentrate treatments with the slopes of the 30C and 70C (P = 0•072, P = 0•003 respectively) differing from the silage. Similar responses were observed for the visceral fat depots. Feeding concentrates resulted in a lower proportion of the total fat being deposited as carcass fat (and hence more as non-carcass fat), proportions averaging 0•65 and 0•61 for S and 70C, respectively; P = 0•066). The proportion of mesenteric fat decreased substantially with increasing total fat (P < 0•001). The relative contribution of intramuscular fat (g/kg total fat) in the longissimus dorsi muscle increased with total fat (P = 0•007) and this was particularly apparent for the S, FM and 30C and less so for 70C. It is concluded that good quality grass silage will support high levels of performance without the need for additional concentrate supplementation. The latter may contribute towards increased fat deposition within the animal.

Keywords

carcass compositioncattlegrowthsilage.
Type
Growth, development and meat science
Information
Animal Science , Volume 76 , Issue 2 , April 2003 , pp. 237 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, R. D. and Gibb, M. J. 1995. The performance and changes in body composition of steers offered cut grass or grazing following three patterns of nutrition in winter. Animal Science 60: 419–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, R. D., Young, N. E. and Laws, J. A. 1985. Changes in the body composition of cattle exhibiting compensatory growth and the modifying effects of grazing management. Animal Production 41: 309–321.Google Scholar
Baker, R. D., Young, N. E. and Laws, J. A. 1992. The effect of diet in winter on the body composition of young steers and subsequent performance during the grazing season. Animal Production 54: 211–219.Google Scholar
Buttery, P. J., Dawson, J. M., Bardsley, R. G., Budd, T. J., Harper, J. M. and Sensky, P. L. 1995. Production efficiency and product quality. In Protein metabolism and nutrition (ed. Nunes, A.F., Portugal, A.V., Costa, J.P. and Riberio, J.R.), European Association for Animal Production publication no. 81, pp. 433–444.Google Scholar
Carstens, G. E., Johnson, D. E., Ellenberger, M. A. and Tatum, J. D. 1991. Physical and chemical components of the empty body during compensatory growth in beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 69: 3251–3264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, S. W., Evans, B. C. and Guenther, J. J. 1993. Body and carcass composition of Angus and Charolais steers as affected by age and nutrition. Journal of Animal Science 71: 86–95.Google Scholar
Fortin, R. A., Simpfendorfer, S., Reid, J. T., Ayala, H. J., Anrique, R. and Kertz, A. F. 1980. Effect of level of intake and influence of breed and sex on chemical composition of cattle. Journal of Animal Science 51: 604–614.Google Scholar
Gibb, M. J. and Baker, R. D. 1991. Compensatory growth and body composition changes in grazing steers following silage feeding without or with a supplement of fish meal and monensin. Animal Production 52: 237–247.Google Scholar
Gill, M., Beever, D. E., Buttery, P. J., England, P., Gibb, M. J. and Baker, R. D. 1987. The effect of estradiol-17ß implantation on the response in voluntary intake, live-weight gain and body composition, to fishmeal supplementation of silage offered to growing calves. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108: 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greathead, H. M. R., Dawson, J. M., Sessions, V. A., Tye, F. N., Buttery, P. J., McAllan, A. B. and Scollan, N. D. 1996. Fat synthesis in different depots of cattle given grass silage and dried grass at different intakes. Animal Science 62: 656-657 (abstr. ).Google Scholar
Johnson, E. R., Butterfield, R. M. and Pryor, W. J. 1972. Studies of fat distribution in the bovine carcass. 1. The partition of fatty tissues between depots. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23: 381–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, E. J., Scollan, N. D., Dhanoa, M. S. and Buttery, P. J. 2003. Growth and the partitioning of nutrients between the different body components in steers fed on all forages or forage: concentrate diets. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge In press.Google Scholar
Kyriazakis, I. and Emmans, G. C. 1991. Diet selection in pigs: dietary choices made by growing pigs following a period of underfeeding with protein. Animal Production 52: 337–346.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1995. Genstat 5 reference manual. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, C. R. 1976. The effect of season of harvest on the utilisation by young cattle of dried grass given alone or as a supplement to grass silage. Ph. D. thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
McCarrick, R.B. 1966. Effect of method of grass conservation and herbage maturity on performance and body composition of beef cattle. Proceedings of the 10th international grassland congress, Helsinki, pp. 575–580.Google Scholar
MacRae, J. C., Bruce, L. A. and Brown, D. S. 1995. Efficiency of utilization of absorbed amino acids in growing lambs given forage and forage: barley diets. Animal Science 61: 277–284.Google Scholar
MacRae, J. C., Walker, A., Brown, D. and Lobley, G. E. 1993. Accretion of total protein and individual amino acids by organs and tissues of growing lambs and the ability of nitrogen balance techniques to quantitate protein retention. Animal Production 57: 237–245.Google Scholar
Mandell, I. B., Gullett, E. A., Buchanan-Smith, J. G. and Campbell, C. P. 1997. Effects of diet and slaughter endpoint on carcass composition and beef quality in Charolais cross steers. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 77: 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1990. UK tables of nutritive value and chemical composition of feedingstuffs. Rowett Research Services Ltd, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1992. Prediction of the energy values of compound feedingstuffs for farm animals. Summary of recommendations of a working party sponsored by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, UK.Google Scholar
Offer, N. W., Cotrill, B. R. and Thomas, C. 1996. The relationship between silage evaluation and animal response. Proceedings of the 11th international silage conference, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, pp. 26–38.Google Scholar
Owens, F. N., Dubeski, P. and Hanson, C. F. 1993. Factors that alter the growth and development of ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 71: 3138–3150.Google Scholar
Owens, F. N., Gill, D. R., Secrist, D. S. and Coleman, S. W. 1995. Review of some aspects of growth and development of feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73: 3152–3172.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. L., Oddy, V. H., Dicker, R. W. and McPhee, M. J. 2001. Post weaning growth of cattle in northern New South Wales. 3. Carry-over effects on finishing, carcass characteristics and intramuscular fat. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41: 1041–1049.Google Scholar
Scollan, N. D., Sargeant, A., McAllan, A. B. and Dhanoa, M. S. 2001. Protein supplementation of grass silages of differing digestibility for growing steers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 136: 89–98.Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Gibbs, B. G., Beever, D. E. and Thurnham, B. R. 1988. The effect of date of cut and barley substitution on gain and on the efficiency of utilisation of grass silage by growing cattle. 1. Gains in live weight and its components. British Journal of Nutrition 60: 297–306.Google Scholar
Thorp, C. L., Wylie, A. R. G., Steen, R. W. J., Shaw, C. and McEvoy, J. D. 2000. Effects of incremental changes in forage: concentrate ratio on plasma hormone and metabolite concentrations and products of rumen fermentation in fattening beef steers. Animal Science 71: 93–109.Google Scholar
Trenkle, A., DeWitt, D. L. and Topel, D. G. 1978. Influence of age, nutrition and genotype on carcass traits and cellular development of the m. longissimus of cattle. Journal of Animal Science 46: 1597–1603.Google Scholar