Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T07:00:31.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of type of silage and level of concentrate supplementation offered during early lactation on total lactation performance of January/February calving cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. W. J. Steen  and
F. J. Gordon
R. W. J. Steen
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down
F. J. Gordon
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down
Get access

Abstract

A 3 × 2 factorial design experiment using 84 British Friesian cows was conducted to assess the effect of offering three types of grass silage and two levels of concentrate supplementation during early lactation on the total lactation performance of cows which calve during January and February. The three types of silage were early-cut wilted (ECW), early-cut unwilted (ECU) and late-cut unwilted (LCU), and the two levels of concentrate supplementation were 538 kg (LC) and 738 kg (HC) during a mean post-calving period of 71 days. The animals had a mean calving date of 29 January and were blocked according to calving date, and allocated at random to the treatments within each block on day 7 of lactation. The treatments were applied from day 7 of lactation until the animals were turned out to pasture on 18 April. Mean milk yields for the indoor period were: HC treatments 1963 (ECW), 1979 (ECU) and 1830 (LCU); LC treatments 1938 (ECW), 1942 (ECU) and 1731 (LCU) ± 41·3 kg; and for the total lactation were: HC treatments 5375 (ECW), 5438 (ECU) and 5284 (LCU); LC treatments 5509 (ECW), 5529 (ECU) and 5316 (LCU) ± 184·1 kg. There was no significant interaction between silage type and level of concentrate supplementation.

Milk composition, animal live weight and body condition were not significantly affected by either silage type or level of concentrate supplementation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , June 1980 , pp. 341 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balch, C. C. and Campling, R. C. 1969. Voluntary intake of food. In Handbuch der Tierernährung (ed. Lenkeit, W., Breirem, K. and Crasemann, E.), Vol. 1, pp. 554–579. Parey, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. 1972. Effect on milk yield of the cow of the level of feeding during lactation. Dairy Sci. Abstr. 34: 265–288.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. 1974. Response of the dairy cow to level of feeding. Bienn. Rev. natn. Inst. Res. Dairy, pp. 14–34.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Broster, Valerie J. and Smith, T. 1969. Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer. VIII. Effect on milk production of level of feeding at two stages of the lactation. J. agric. Set, Camb. 72: 229–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, W. H., Broster, Valerie J., Smith, T. and Siviter, J. W. 1975. Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer. IX. Food utilization in lactation. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 84: 173–186.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. and Strickland, M. J. 1977. Feeding the dairy cow in early lactation. A.D.A.S. q. Rev. No. 26, pp. 87–105.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Sutton, J. D., Bines, J. A., Johnson, V. W., Smith, T., Siviter, J.W., Napper, D. J. and Broster, Valerie J. 1977. Effect on food utilization of level of intake and proportion of concentrates to hay in the diet. Rep. natn. Jnst. Res. Dairy. 1975-76, p. 69.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. and Tuck, Valerie J. 1967. Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer. VI. The effect on milk production of the level of feeding during the last six months of pregnancy and the first eight weeks of lactation. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 69: 465–477.Google Scholar
Butler, T. M. 1972. Feeding concentrates to dairy cattle.Proc. An Foras Taliintais Dairying and Pig Conf., Fermoy, pp. 53–55.Google Scholar
Butler, T. M. 1975. Effect of wilting on silage intake and performance of dairy cows. An Foras Taliintais, Anim. Prod. Res. Rep., p. 102.Google Scholar
Butler, T. M. 1976. Winter feeding of dairy cows. In Dairy Herd Management. An Foras Talùntais, Handb. Ser. No. 4, pp. 17–24.Google Scholar
Butler, T. M., Gleeson, P. A. and Comerford, P. J. 1975. Effect of type of forage harvester and herbage dry matter content on silage intake and performance of lactating cows. An Foras Talntais, Anim. Prod. Res. Rep., pp. 103–104.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E. and Watson, J. N. 1970. Silage and milk production, a comparison between wilted and unwilted grass silages made with and without formic acid. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 25: 278–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, D. P., Drennan, M. J. and Flynn, A. V. 1977. Potential of Irish grassland for beef production. Proc. int. Meet. Animal Production from Temperate Grassland, Dublin, pp. 12–19.Google Scholar
Combellas, J. J. and Hodgson, J. 1975. The influence of the level of milk yield established at the start of the grazing season upon the response of spring-calving dairy cows to variations in herbage allowance. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Ser.) 4: 113–114 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Demarquilly, C. and Dulphy, J. P. 1977. Effect of ensiling on feed intake and animal performance. Proc. int. Meet. Animal Production from Temperate Grassland, Dublin, pp. 53–61.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, J. C., Gordon, C. H. and Waldo, D. R. 1976. Formic acid as a silage preservative for milking cows. J. Dairy Sci. 59: 278–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drennan, M. J. 1975. Winter feeding of cattle. Ir. Grassld Anim. Prod. Ass. J. 10: 71–81.Google Scholar
Gleeson, P. A. 1969. Rep. Dairy Husbandry Seminar, Moorepark Agric. Res. Stn (Mimeo-graph).Google Scholar
Gleeson, P. A. 1970. Feeding dairy concentrates to maximum advantage under Irish conditions. In Dairy Nutrition, pp. 85–95. US Feed Grains Council, London.Google Scholar
Gleeson, P. A. 1972. Winter feeding of dairy cows. Proc. An Foras Taluntais Dairying and Pig Conf, Fermoy, pp. 56–59.Google Scholar
Gleeson, P. A. 1973. Pre and post calving feeding of dairy cattle. Ir. Grassld Anim. Prod. Ass. J. 8: 68–78.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1976. Effect of concentrate level and stocking rate on performance of dairy cows calving in late winter. Anim. Prod. 22: 175–187.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1977. Comparison of results from long term dairy cattle feeding experiments with calculated N-requirements. Proc. 2nd int. Symp. Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, The Netherlands, pp. 142–148.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. and Forbes, T. J. 1971. Some factors affecting the yield of milk and its solids-not-fat content. 44th A. Rep. agric. Res. Inst. Nth. Ire., pp. 25–29.Google Scholar
Horne, B. 1975. Forage quality and concentrates for the milking cow. A. Rev. Bridgets expl Husbandry Fm, No. 15, pp. 52–55.Google Scholar
Kesler, E. M. and Spahr, S. L. 1964. Physiological effects of high level concentrate feeding. J. Dairy Sci. 47: 1122–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J. 1967. A study of ensiling wilted and unwilted grass at two stages of maturity. 2. Effect on milk production. Rec. agric. Res., Min. Agric. Nth. Ire. 16: 57–62.Google Scholar
McIlmoyle, W. A. 1978. The effect of level of supplementation and silage regrowth interval on the performance of beef cattle. Anim. Prod. 26: 361–362 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Ministry Of Agriculture, Fisheries And Food, Department Of Agriculture And Fisheries For Scotland And Department Of Agriculture For Northern Ireland. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Tech. Bull. 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Moisey, F. R. and Leaver, J. D. 1979. A comparison of a three- with a two-cut silage system for dairy cattle. Anim. Prod. 28: 422 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Moran, J. B. and Holmes, W. 1978. The application of compensatory growth in grass/cereal beef production systems in the United Kingdom. Wld Rev. Anim. Prod. 14 (2): 65–73.Google Scholar
Murdoch, J. C. 1967. Factors affecting the voluntary intake of silage and hay. J. Br. GrassldSoc. 22: 95–99.Google Scholar
Østergaard, V. 1976. Strategies for feeding of concentrates as a means to attain optimum feeding level in milk production. Proc. 27th A. Meet. Ear. Ass. Anim. Prod., Zurich.Google Scholar
Rook, J. A. F., Line, C. and Rowland, S. J. 1960. The effect of the plane of energy nutrition of the cow during the late winter-feeding period on the changes in the solids-not-fat content of milk during the spring-grazing period. J. Dairy Res. 27: 427–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. and Gordon, F. J. 1980. The effect of level and system of concentrate allocation to January/February calving cows on total lactation performance. Anim. Prod. 30: 39–51.Google Scholar
Strickland, M. J. and Lessells, W. J. 1971. The effect on lactating heifers and cows of feeding different flat rates of concentrate. Anim. Prod. 13: 379 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Trimberger, G. W., Tyrrell, H. F., Morrow, D. A., Reid, J. T., Wright, M. J., Shipe, W. F., Merrill, W. G., Loosli, J. K., Coppock, C. E., Moore, L. A. and Gordon, C. H. 1972. Effects of liberal concentrate feeding on health, reproductive efficiency, economy of milk production, and other related responses of the dairy cow. N. Y. Fd Life Sci. Bull. No. 8.Google Scholar
Wood, P. D. P. and Newcomb, R. 1976. The effect of supplementary winter feeding on the total yield and lactation curves of cows in a herd of British Friesian cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 81: 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar