Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T09:34:23.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of concentrate type and supplementary lactic acid or soya oil on milk production characteristics in dairy cows offered grass silages of contrasting fermentation type

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. G. Doherty
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR
C. S. Mayne
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR
Get access

Abstract

Sixteen first lactation dairy cows were used in a 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design experiment. Two silages, an extensively fermented inoculant-treated silage or a restricted fermented, mixed aliphatic carboxylic acid-treated silage were offered with two concentrate types (starch- or fibre-based) and supplementary lactic acid (LA, 0·4 kg/day) or soya oil (SO, 0·41 kg/day). Concentrates containing 180 g crude protein per kg were offered at 6 kg/day. Silage dry-matter intake tended to be higher (P = 0·07) with restricted fermented silage compared with the inoculant silage. Milk fat or protein concentrations were not significantly affected (P > 0·05) by silage fermentation type. LA inclusion had no significant effect (P > 0·05) on animal performance. SO inclusion significantly increased (P < 0-05) milk yield (+ 0·8 kg/day), decreased milk fat concentration and yield (40·2, 32·9 g/kg and 779, 667 g/dayfor - and + SO respectively, P< 0·001) and decreased milk protein concentration (-0·81 g/kg, P < 0·01). A significant concentrate × soya-oil interaction (P<0·01) suggested a greater reduction in milk fat concentration with the SO, starch compared with the SO, fibre combination. Modified acid-detergent fibre (P < 0·01) and neutraldetergent fibre (P < 0·001) apparent digestibility coefficients were significantly lower with starch- compared with fibre-based concentrates. Results suggest that milk production responses to changes in concentrate composition were not influenced by the extent of restriction of the silage fermentation process.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. An advisory manual prepared by the AFRC Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E., Cammell, S. B., Sutton, J. D., Spooner, M. C, Haines, M. J. and Harland, J. I. 1989. Effect of concentrate type on energy utilisation in lactating dairy cows. In Energy metabolism of farm animals (ed. Van Der Honing, Y. and Close, W. H.), pp. 3336. Pudoc, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Ben Salem, H., Krzeminski, R., Ferlay, A. and Doreau, M. 1993. Effect of Hpid supply on in vivo digestion in cows: comparison of hay and corn silage diets. Canadian journal of Animal Science 73: 547557.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E., Gill, M. S. and Watson, J. N. 1981. Silage and milk production: a comparison between barley and dried sugar beet pulp as silage supplements. Grass and Forage Science 36: 319324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G., Martin, P. A., Robertson, S. and Hunter, E. A. 1992. Effects of the type of additive and the type of supplement on the utilization of grass silage for milk production in dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 47: 391399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G., Robertson, S., Martin, P. A. and Jackson, D. A. 1990. The effects of the addition of a mixture of ammonium salts of methanoic and propanoic acids and octanoic acid at ensiling on the nutritional value of silage for milk production. Proceedings of the ninth silage conference, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, pp. 120121.Google Scholar
Choung, J. J. and Chamberlain, D. G. 1993. Effects of addition of lactic acid and post-ruminal supplementation with casein on the nutritional value of grass silage for milk production in dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 48: 380386.Google Scholar
Clancy, M. J. and Wilson, R. K. 1966. Development and application of a new chemical method for predicting the digestibility and intake of herbage samples. Proceedings of the tenth international grassland congress, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 445453.Google Scholar
Clapperton, J. L. and Steele, W. 1985. Effect of different fats mixed with barley or soyabean meal on feed intake and milk production of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 29082913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushnahan, A. and Mayne, C. S. 1995. Effects of ensilage of grass on performance and nutrient utilization by dairy cattle. 1. Food intake and milk production. Animal Science 60: 337345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushnahan, A., Mayne, C. S. and Unsworth, E. F. 1995. Effects of ensilage of grass on performance and nutrient utilization by dairy cattle. 2. Nutrient metabolism and rumen fermentation. Animal Science 60: 347359.Google Scholar
Daniels, Z. M., Chen, X. B., Kyle, D. J., Sinclair, K. and Orskov, E. R. 1994. Purine derivatives in urine and plasma of lactating cows given different levels of food intake. Animal Production 58: 453 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Davies, O. D. and Haigh, P. M. 1993. A comparison of formic acid and an acid-salt type additive on the performance of dairy cows in early lactation. Grass and Forage Science 48: 6469.Google Scholar
DePeters, E. J. 1993. Influence of feeding fat to dairy cows on milk composition. Proceedings of the Cornell nutrition conference, Cornell Uniivrsity, Ithaca, New York, pp. 199215.Google Scholar
DePeters, E. J. and Cant, J P 1992. Nutritional factors influencing the nitrogen composition of bovine milk: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 20432070.Google Scholar
DePeters, E. J., Taylor, S. J., Franke, A. A. and Aguirrt, A. 1985. Effects of feeding whole cottonseed on composition of milk. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 897902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deriaz, R. E. 1961. Routine analysis of carbohydrate and lignin in herbage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 12: 152160.Google Scholar
Dhiman, T. R. and Satter, L. D. 1993. Protein as the first-limiting nutrient for lactating cows fed high proportions of good quality alfalfa silage. Journal of Dairy Science 76: 19601971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elizalde, H. F. 1993. Studies on the effects of chemical and physical characteristics of grass silage and degree of competition per feeding space on the feeding behaviour of lactating dairy cows. Ph.D. thesis, Queen's University, Belfast.Google Scholar
Elmeddah, Y., Doreau, M. and Michalet-Doreau, B. 1991. Interaction of lipid supply and carbohydrates in the diet of sheep with digestibility and ruminal digestion. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 116: 437445.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M., Jackson, D. A., Johnson, C. L., Stockill, P. and Hoyle, B. S. 1986. A method for the automatic monitoring of food intake and feeding behaviour of individual cattle kept in a group. Research and Development in Agriculture 3: 175180.Google Scholar
Gonda, H. L. and Lindberg, J. E. 1994. Evaluation of dietary nitrogen utilization in dairy cows based on urea concentrations in blood, urine and milk, and on urinary concentration of purine derivatives. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 44: 236245.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1989. An evaluation through lactating cattle of a bacterial inoculant as an additive for grass silage. Grass and Forage Science 44: 169179.Google Scholar
Grummer, R. R. 1993. Factors affecting production responses of dairy cattle to supplemental fat. Proceedings of the Cornell nutrition conference, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, pp. 186198.Google Scholar
Hermansen, J. E., Ostersen, S. and Aaes, O. 1994. Effect of the levels of N fertiliser, grass and supplementary feeds on nitrogen composition and renneting properties of milk from cows at pasture. Journal of Dairy Research 61: 179189.Google Scholar
Huhtanen, P. 1987. The effect of dietary inclusion of barley, unmolassed sugar beet pulp and molasses on milk production, digestibility and digesta passage in dairy cows, given silage based diets. Journal of Agricultural Science in Finland 59: 101120.Google Scholar
Huhtanen, P. 1988. The effects of barley, unmolassed sugar-beet pulp and molasses supplements on organic matter, nitrogen and fibre digestion in the rumen of cattle given a silage diet. Animal Feed Science and Technology 20: 259278.Google Scholar
Jaakkola, S. and Huhtanen, P. 1990. Response to cellulase treatment of silage and replacement of barley by unmolassed sugar beet pulp in the diets of growing cattle. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 40: 415426.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. A. and Furness, S. 1990. Restriction of silage fermentation by the application of high levels of mixed aliphatic carboxylic acids on the productive performance of lactating dairy cattle. Animal Production 50: 584585 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Jackson, D. A., Johnson, C. L. and Forbes, J. M. 1991. The effect of compound composition and silage characteristics on silage intake, feeding behaviour, production of milk and live-weight change in lactating dairy cows. Animal Production 52: 1119.Google Scholar
Jenkins, T. C. and Jenny, B. F. 1992. Nutrient digestion and lactation performance of dairy cows fed combinations of prilled fat and canola oil. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 796803.Google Scholar
Ling, E. R. 1963. A textbook of dairy chemistry volume 2, pp. 8586. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Martin, P. A., Chamberlain, D. G., Robertson, S. and Hirst, D. 1994. Rumen fermentation patterns in sheep receiving silages of different chemical composition supplemented with concentrates rich in starch or in digestible fibre. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 122: 145150.Google Scholar
Mayne, C. S. 1990. An evaluation of an inoculant of Lactobacillus plantarum as an additive for grass silage for dairy cattle. Animal Production 51: 113.Google Scholar
Mayne, C. S. 1992. An evaluation of the concentrate sparing effect of four silage additives. Animal Production 54: 488 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Mayne, C. S. and Gordon, F. J. 1984. The effect of type of concentrate and level of concentrate feeding on milk production. Animal Production 39: 6576.Google Scholar
Moorby, J. M., Dewhurst, R. J. and Marsden, S. 1994. The effects of dietary fat on the yield and relative proportions of different milk protein fractions from dairy cows. Animal Production, 58: 436 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Morrison, I. M. 1979. Changes in the cell wall components of laboratory silages and the effect of various additives on these changes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93: 581586.Google Scholar
Mould, F. L. and Orskov, E. R. 1983. Manipulation of rumen fluid pH and its influence on cellulolysis in-sacco, dry matter degradation and the rumen microflora of sheep offered either hay or concentrate. Animal Feed Science and Technology 10: 114.Google Scholar
Outen, G. E., Beever, D. E. and Fenlon, J. S. 1976. Direct methylation of long chain fatty acids in faeces, digesta and feeds, without prior extraction. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 27: 419425.Google Scholar
Palmquist, D. L. and Jenkins, T. C. 1980. Fat in lactation rations: review. Journal of Dairy Science 63: 114.Google Scholar
Phipps, R. H., Sutton, J. D., Weller, R. F. and Bines, J. A. 1987. The effect of concentrate composition and method of silage feeding on intake and performance of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109: 337343.Google Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. and Balch, C. C. 1961. The effect of intraruminal infusion of acetic, propionic and butyric acids on the yield and composition of the milk of the cow. British journal of Nutrition 15: 361369.Google Scholar
Rook, J. A. F., Storry, J. E. and Wheelock, J. V. 1965. Plasma glucose and acetate and milk secretion in the ruminant. Journal of Dairy Science 48: 745747.Google Scholar
Sloan, B. K., Rowlinson, P. and Armstrong, D. G. 1988. Milk production in early lactation dairy cows given grass silag ad libitum: influence of concentrate energy source, crude protein content and level of concentrate allowance. Animal Production 46: 317331.Google Scholar
Steele, W. 1985. High-oil, high-protein diets and milk secretion by cows. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 14091415.Google Scholar
Steele, W., Noble, R. C. and Moore, J. H. 1971. The effects of 2 methods of incorporating soyabean oil into the diet on milk yield and composition in the cow. journal of Dairy Research, 38: 4348.Google Scholar
Thomas, C, Aston, K., Daley, S. R. and Bass, J. 1986. Milk production from silage. 4. The effect of the composition of the supplement. Animal Production 42: 315325.Google Scholar
Tiemeyer, W. and Giesecke, D. 1982. Quantitative determination of allantoin in biological fluids by reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography. Analytical Biochemistry 123: 1113.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. 1976. Laboratory methods for evaluating energy value of feedstuffs. In Feed energy sources for livestock (ed. Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 351365. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar