Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T21:57:19.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of additive treatment of grass silage and the food additive avoparcin on the response of calves to supplementation of silage-based diets with fish meal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. W. J. Steen
R. W. J. Steen
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments have been carried out to examine the effects of the fermentation quality of grass silage and the inclusion of avoparcin in the diet on the response in the performance of calves to supplementation of silage-based diets with fish meal. The eight treatments used in each experiment consisted of untreated and formic acid-treated (2·5 1/t) silages offered ad libitum and supplemented with either barley (B) or a barley/fish meal (BF) concentrate (200 g fish meal per kg), without or with 150 mg avoparcin per head daily in a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design. All animals received 1·25 and 1·0 kg concentrates per head daily in experiments 1 and 2 respectively. In each experiment, the diets were offered to 40 castrated male cattle which were initially 126 and 110 kg live weight in experiments 1 and 2 respectively. On average over the two experiments the untreated and formic acid-treated silages contained 24·8 and 24·5 g nitrogen (N) per kg dry matter (DM); 475 and 571 g protein N per kg total N; 76 and 62 g ammonia-N per kg total N and 45-9 and 27·5 g volatile fatty acids per kg DM respectively. Silage DM intakes for the untreated silages supplemented with B and BF and the acid-treated silages supplemented with B and BF without avoparcin and for the untreated silages supplemented with B and BF and the acid-treated silages supplemented with B and BF with avoparcin were 3·0, 3·2, 3·2, 3·0, 2·9, 3·0, 3·0 and 3·2 (s.e. 0·16) kg/day respectively. Live-weight gains for the corresponding treatments were 0·97, 1·12, 0·98, 1·01, 1·00, 1·07, 1·10 and 1·13 (s.e. 0·032) kg/day respectively. It is concluded that the inclusion of fish meal in diets based on well preserved, grass silage and barley did not affect intake and produced a small response (70 g/day) in the live-weight gain of calves. The inclusion of avoparcin in the diet did not significantly affect the response to fish meal.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , October 1988 , pp. 245 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. Recommended Procedures for Use in the Measurement of Beef Cattle and Carcasses. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock, pp. 121–181. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Chapple, D. G. 1983. Protein supplementation for calves on silage diets. Animal Production 36: 513 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
England, P. and Gill, M. 1985. The effect of fish meal and sucrose supplementation on the voluntary intake of grass silage and live-weight gain of young cattle. Animal Production 40: 259–265.Google Scholar
Garstang, J. R. 1981. Silage supplements for calves. Animal Production 32: 355 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Garstang, J. R., Thomas, C. and Gill, M. 1979. The effect of supplementation of grass silage with fish meal on intake and performance by British Friesian calves. Animal Production 28: 423 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Gill, M. and Beever, D. E. 1982. The effect of protein supplementation on digestion and glucose metabolism in young cattle fed on silage. British Journal of Nutrition 48: 37–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, M., Beever, D. E., Buttery, P. J., England, P., Gibb, M. J. and Baker, R. D. 1987. The effect of oestradiol-17β implantation on the response in voluntary intake, live-weight gain and body composition, to fishmeal supplementation of silage offered to growing calves. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108: 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, M. and England, P. 1981. The effect of type of protein supplement on voluntary intake and nitrogen retention in calves given grass silage. Animal Production 32: 355 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Kay, M., Pejic, N. and Hunter, E. A. 1983. The value of food additives in beef production systems. Animal Production 36: 528 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A. and Harrington, G. 1982. Beef carcase grading and classification. In Carcase Evaluation in Livestock Breeding, Production and Marketing, pp. 163–201. Granada, St. Albans.Google Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Neilson, D. R. and Hunter, E. A. 1985. The effect of growth promoters on fattening cattle: growth, intake and carcass composition. Animal Production 40: 538 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
McDonald, P. and Edwards, R. A. 1976. The influence of conservation methods on digestion and utilization of forages by ruminants. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 35: 201–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacGregor, R. C. and Armstrong, D. G. 1982. Mode of action of the food antibiotic avoparcin in sheep. Animal Production 34: 376 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Ochoa, C. and Owen, E. 1983. Energy and protein supplementation of grass silage for Friesian steers: effect on performance from 2 to 7 months of age and on subsequent compensatory growth. Animal Production 36: 536 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Owen, E. and Ochoa, C. 1982. Energy and protein supplementation of grass silage for Friesian steers: effect on performance from 4 to 7 months of age and on subsequent compensatory growth. Animal Production 34: 387–388 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. 1984. A comparison of two-cut and three-cut systems of silage making for beef cattle using two cultivars of perennial ryegrass. Animal Production 38: 171–179.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. 1985. Protein supplementation of silage-based diets for calves. Animal Production 41: 293–300.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. 1989. A comparison of soya-bean, sunflower and fish meals as protein supplements for yearling cattle offered grass silage based diets. Animal Production In press.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J., Unsworth, E. F., Gracey, H. I., Kennedy, S. J. and Anderson, R. 1988. Evaluation studies in the development of a commercial bacterial inoculant as an additive for grass silage. 3. Responses i n growing cattle and interaction with protein supplementation. Grass and Forage Science In press.Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Gill, M. and Austin, A. R. 1980. The effect of supplements of fishmeal and lactic acid on voluntary intake of silage by calves. Grass and Forage Science 35: 275–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, P. C. 1982. Utilization of conserved forages. In Forage Protein in Ruminant Animal Production (ed. Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E. and Gunn, R. G.), Occasional Publication, British Society of Animal Production, No. 6, pp. 67–76.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C. and Chamberlain, D. G. 1982. The utilization of silage protein. In Forage Protein Conservation and Utilization, Commission of the European Communities Seminar, Dublin, pp. 121–145.Google Scholar
Unsworth, E. F., McCullough, I. I., McCullough, T. A., O'neill, D. G., Steen, R. W. J. and Titterington, C. I. 1985. The effect of avoparcin and monensin on the performance of growing and finishing cattle offered grass silage-based diets. Animal Production 41: 75–82.Google Scholar