Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T14:20:00.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The economic value of somatic cell count payment schemes for UK dairy cattle breeding programmes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. F. Veerkamp
Affiliation:
Genetics and Behavioural Sciences Dept, SAC Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
A. W. Stott
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Rural Economics, Scottish Agricultural College, King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
W. G. Hill
Affiliation:
Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT
S. Brotherstone
Affiliation:
Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT
Get access

Abstract

Predicted transmitting abilities for somatic cell counts (SCC) are available in the United Kingdom and there is a direct economic benefit attached to reducing SCC as the milk payment schemes include a penalty for high SCC levels in bulk tank samples and sometimes a premium for low SCC. The aim of the present study was to establish the economic importance of bulls' breeding values for SCC in relation to this payment scheme for SCC. To do this, an empirical method was developed using 645071 individual cow SCC and milk yield test-day records from 358 herds. The economic value was calculated by (i) decreasing all individual cow records by 0·01 and comparing the average penalty with the current average penalty, and (ii) taking the derivative of a Gompertz function describing the within-herd penalty per cow as a function of the average within-herd 3-month rolling geometric mean SCC. Mean milk test-day yield and average test-day SCC were 20·4 kg and 262 kcount per ml respectively with, on average, 83 cows tested each day. In the current situation the average penalty paid was 0·54, 0·18 and 3·2 pence per litre depending on whether an England and Wales, Scottish or future payment scheme was used, respectively. Across the population, the economic values per 0·01 decrease in SCC were £1·04, £0·54 and £6·03 per cow per year for these three payments schemes respectively. However these economic values depend strongly on the mean SCC. Herds have different means and as the future population mean is difficult to predict, it is suggested that for herds with the majority of their bulk tank samples in penalty bands 1, 2 or 3+ (average SCC of <150, 150 to 250 and 250+) the economic values are £0, £0·50, and £15 per cow per year per 0·01 reduction in SCC, respectively, until additional benefits have been quantified.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banos, G. 1996. Survey on genetic evaluation procedures for functional traits in cattle in various countries. Proceedings of the international workshop on genetic improvement of functional traits in cattle. Gembloux, January 21–23.Google Scholar
Bowman, P. J., Visscher, P. M. and Goddard, M. E. 1996. Customized selection indices for dairy bulls in Australia Animal Science 62:393403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekkers, J. C. M., Van Erp, T. and Schukken, Y. H. 1996. Economic benefit of reducing somatic cell count under the milk quality program of Ontario. Journal of Dairy Science 396401.Google Scholar
Genstat 5 Committee. 1989. Genstat 5 reference manual Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Milk Marketing Board. 1994. Milk quality payment schemes in England and Wales. Milk Marketing Board, Thames Ditton, Surrey, UK.Google Scholar
Mrode, R. A., Swanson, G. J. T. and Winters, M. S. 1998. Genetic parameters and evaluations for somatic cell counts and its relationship with production and type traits in some dairy breeds in the United Kingdom. Animal Science. In press.Google Scholar
Schukken, Y. H., Leslie, K. E., Weersink, A. J. and Martin, S. W. 1992a. Ontario bulk milk somatic cell count reduction program. 1. Impact on somatic cell counts and milk quality. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 33523358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schukken, Y. H., Leslie, K. E., Weersink, A. J. and Martin, S. W. 1992b. Ontario bulk milk somatic cell count reduction program. 2. Dynamics of bulk milk somatic cell counts. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 33593366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veerkamp, R. F., Hill, W. G., Brotherstone, S., Stott, A. W. and Simm, G. 1995. Selection for longevity and yield in dairy cattle using transmitting abilities for yield and type Animal Science 61:189197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar