Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T04:44:04.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Age, weight or total feed intake as bases for the performance testing of growing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. A. Lodge ,
D. Lister ,
J. D. Wood  and
M. S. Wolynetz
G. A. Lodge
Affiliation:
ARC Meat Research Institute, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
D. Lister
Affiliation:
ARC Meat Research Institute, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
J. D. Wood
Affiliation:
ARC Meat Research Institute, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
M. S. Wolynetz
Affiliation:
ARC Meat Research Institute, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
Get access

Abstract

In an experiment which showed that the results of a genotype comparison are influenced by the design of the test, 16 castrated male and 16 female pigs of each of Large White (LW) and Gloucester Old Spot (GOS) breeds were allocated equally among four treat- ments: WW—rationed by weight and slaughtered by weight; A A—rationed by age and slaughtered by age; AW—rationed by age and slaughtered by weight; and WF—rationed by weight and slaughtered after a common total feed intake. The experiment was designed so that performance of LW would be similar on all treatments, and the degree to which the GOS differed from the LW on each of these treatments was then evaluated. All pigs started on the experiment at 12 weeks of age, at which time mean weight of the LW was 14% greater than the mean for the GOS. The only between- breed difference that was statistically significant (P<0·05) on all treatments was weight of lean. Average daily gain and efficiency of feed conversion were significantly different between breeds only on the WW treatment. Weight of fat was significantly different on WW and AW but not on AA or WF.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , December 1978 , pp. 345 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1967. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 3, Pigs. Technical Reviews and Summaries. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Braude, R., Mitchell, K. G. and Pittman, R. J. 1975. A note on rationing of growing pigs according to age. Anim. Prod. 21: 337–339.Google Scholar
Brown, A. J. and Williams, D. R. 1977. Pig carcass evaluation. Measurement of composition using anatomical dissection. MRI Memorandum. No. 33. Meat Research Institute, Langford, Bristol.Google Scholar
Fuller, M. F., Yen, H. T. and Lin, H. S. 1974. The growth and body composition of pigs of two genotypes on different nutritional regimes. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Series) 3: 86 (Abstr).Google Scholar
Meat And Livestock Commission. 1976. Pig Improvement Scheme Yearbook 1975-76. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley, Bucks.Google Scholar