Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:15:14.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The redilution of deep frozen bull semen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

K. L. Macmillan ,
P. Shannon  and
N. L. Hart
K. L. Macmillan
Affiliation:
New Zealand Dairy Board, Awahuri A.B. Centre, Feilding
P. Shannon
Affiliation:
Newstead A.B. Centre, Hamilton, New Zealand
N. L. Hart
Affiliation:
New Zealand Dairy Board, Awahuri A.B. Centre, Feilding
Get access

Abstract

With deep frozen bull semen processed in an egg yolk – milk diluent and stored in plastic straws at — 196°C, a lowering of the dose rate from 25 million (3824 inseminations) to 12·5 million total sperm per insemination (3900 inseminations) resulted in a decline in conception rate (CR = 49-day non-return rate) of 6·5 % (60·1 v. 53·6). Development of a processing technique which allowed sperm to be stored at — 196°C at concentrations of 450 or 100 million sperm per ml prior to subsequent rapid thawing and redilution (RDF) allowed dose rates to be reduced to around 5 million total sperm per insemination without any significant reduction in CR. The re-diluted semen was used for inseminations made from 4 to 8 h after thawing and redilution. The use of RDF procedure could reduce semen storage costs, increase the number of inseminations per sire, and has potential application in oestrus synchronization programmes or in countries with developing insemination programmes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , February 1978 , pp. 67 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Almquist, J. O. and Wiggin, H. B. 1973. Effect of different combinations of freezing and thawing rates upon survival of bull spermatozoa in US plastic straws. A.I. Dig. 21 (9): 10–11.Google Scholar
Desjardins, C. and Hafs, H. D. 1962. Motility and fertility during post-thawing storage of bovine spermatozoa frozen concentrated, thawed, and re-extended. J. Dairy Sci. 45: 1242–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, K. and Einarsson, S. 1975. A new thawing fluid for deep frozen boar spermatozoa. Acta vet. scand. 16: 143–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsson, K. and Einarsson, S. 1976. Fertility of deep frozen boar spermatozoa. Influence of thawing diluents and of boars. Acta vet. scand. 17: 43–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsson, K., Einarsson, S. and Nicander, L. 1975. Influence of thawing diluents on vitality, acrosome morphology, ultrastructure and enzyme release of deep-frozen boar spermatozoa. Acta vet. scand. 17: 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, R. J. and Salamon, S. 1969. Freezing ram spermatozoa by the pellet method. III. The effects of pellet volume, composition of the thawing solution, and reconcentration of the thawed semen on survival of spermatozoa. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 22: 1561–1572.Google Scholar
MacMillan, K. L. and Curnow, R. J. 1976. A.B. in New Zealand dairy herds. IV. Seasonal patterns in semen usage. N.Z. Jl exp. Agric. 4: 9–14.Google Scholar
MacMillan, K. L. and Watson, J. D. 1975. Fertility differences between groups of sires relative to the stage of oestrus at the time of insemination. Anim. Prod. 21: 243–249.Google Scholar
Moller, K., MacMillan, K. L. and Shannon, P. 1972. Site of insemination and subsequent non-return rate in cows. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 15: 252–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New Zealand Dairy Board. 1974. Rediluted deep frozen semen. 49th Farm Production Report, p. 23.Google Scholar
Robbins, R. K., Saacke, R. G. and Chandler, P. T. 1976. Influence of freeze rate, thaw rate and glycerol level on acrosomal retention and survival of bovine spermatozoa frozen in French straws. J. Anim. Sci. 42: 145–154CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salamon, S. and Brandon, M. R. 1971. Effect of composition of the thawing solution on survival of ram spermatozoa frozen by the pellet method. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 24: 355–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salamon, S. and Vbser, D. 1972. Effect of composition of Tris-based diluent and of thawing solution on survival of ram spermatozoa frozen by the pellet method. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 25: 605–618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shannon, P. 1968. Advances in semen dilution. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 28: 23–31.Google Scholar
Shannon, P. 1972. The diatube method of freezing semen for use as rediluted deep freeze. VIIth int. Congr. Anim. Reprod. and Artificial Insemination, Munich, pp. 1363–1367.Google Scholar
Shannon, P. and Curson, B. 1972. Toxic effect and action of dead sperm on diluted bovine semen. J. Dairy Sci. 55: 614–620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stichbury, J. W. 1968. Genetic implications of advances in semen dilution. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 28: 32–39.Google Scholar
Wiggin, H. B. and Almquist, J. O. 1975. Combinations of glycerol percent, glycerol equilibration time and thawing rate upon freezability of bull spermatozoa in plastic straws. J. Dairy Sci. 58: 416–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed