Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T07:44:34.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of the quality of dietary lignocellulose on digestion, zootechnical performance and health of the growing rabbit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

T. Gidenne ,
P. Arveux  and
O. Madec
T. Gidenne*
Affiliation:
Station de Recherches Cunicoles, INRA, Centre de Recherche de Toulouse, BP 27, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France
P. Arveux
Affiliation:
UNCA-DNS (UCAAB), BP 19, Chierry 024020 Château Thierry, France
O. Madec
Affiliation:
Station de Recherches Cunicoles, INRA, Centre de Recherche de Toulouse, BP 27, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France
*
† E-mail gidenne@touolouse.inra.fr
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance and digestive response of the growing rabbit according to a change in the nature of the lignocellulose (ADF), without a change in the ADF level. Three diets with a linearly decreasing lignin/cellulose ratio (ADL/cellulose = 0·8; 0·4; 0·2; respectively LC8, LC4, LC2) were given to a total of 162 rabbits per diet, from weaning till slaughter weight. A reduction of the ADL/cellulose ratio led to a lower food intake (LC8 v LC2: -11%), associated with a lower daily weight gain (-6% for LC2). Mortality and morbidity rate was significantly greater (+50%) for LC2 and LC4 diets compared with the LC8. Thus, the health risk index (morbidity + mortality) increased by 20 units for LC4 and LC2 compared with LC8 diet. In parallel, rate of passage was slower (mean retention time 4·5 h greater, P = 0045) with LC4 and LC2 diets. Dry-matter digestibility was slightly affected, whereas protein digestion was favoured with low ADL/cellulose ratio. It is recommended that a minimum lignin supply (about 6 g/day) is adopted as well as a minimum dietary lignocellulose to ensure growth performance and health of the growing rabbit.

Keywords

diarrhoeadigestionfibrerabbits.
Type
Non-ruminant, nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 73 , Issue 1 , August 2001 , pp. 97 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association Française de Normalisation. 1997. Norme Française homologuée, Aliments des animaux. Détermination séquentielle des constituants pariéaux. Méthode par traitement aux détergents neutre et acide et à l’acide sulfurique. AFNOR, Paris. NF V 18-122, p. 11.Google Scholar
Bennegadi, N., Gidenne, T. and Licois, D. 2000. Nonspecific enteritis in the growing rabbit: detailed description and incidence according to fibre deficiency and sanitary status. Proceedings of the seventh world rabbit congress, 5-7 July 2000, Valence, Spain. World Rabbit Science 8: (suppl. 1, vol. C) 109–116.Google Scholar
Blas, C. de and Mateos, G. G. 1998. Feed formulation. In The nutrition of the rabbit (ed. Blas, C. de and Wiseman, J.), pp. 241–254. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Blas, E., Cervera, C. and Fernandez Carmona, J. 1994. Effect of two diets with varied starch and fibre levels on the performances of 4-7 weeks old rabbits. World Rabbit Science 2: 117–121.Google Scholar
Blasco, A. and Ouhayoun, J. 1996. Harmonization of criteria and terminology in rabbit meat research. Revised proposal. World Rabbit Science 4: 93–99.Google Scholar
Duncan, S. H., Flint, H. J. and Stewart, C. S. 2000. Dietary manipulation used to reduce the survival of Escherichia coli O157. Proceedings of the second joint INRA-RRI gastrointestinal microbiology symposium, 25-26 May 2000, Clermont Ferrand, France. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development 40: 215.Google Scholar
European Group on Rabbit Nutrition. 1995. European reference method for in-vivo determination of diet digestibility in rabbits. World Rabbit Science 3: 41–43.Google Scholar
Falcao e Cunha, L. 1988. Os constiutentes do parede celular no processo digestivo de coelho. Tesis doctoral Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universita Tecnica Lisbonne. Google Scholar
Gidenne, T. 1994. Effets d’une réduction de la teneur en fibres alimentaires sur le transit digestif du lapin. Comparaison et validation de modèles d’ajustement des cinétiques d’excrétion fécale des marqueurs. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development 34: 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidenne, T. 1996. Conséquences digestives de l’ingestion de fibres et d’amidon chez le lapin en croissance: vers une meilleure définition des besoins. INRA Production Animale 9: 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidenne, T. 2000. Recent advances and perspectives in rabbit nutrition: emphasis on fibre requirements. World Rabbit Science 8: 23–42.Google Scholar
Gidenne, T. and Perez, J. M. 1994. Apports de lignines et alimentation du lapin en croissance. I. Conséquences sur la digestion et le transit. Annales de Zootechnie 43: 313–322.Google Scholar
Gidenne, T. and Perez, J. M. 1996. Apports de cellulose dans l’alimentation du lapin en croissance. I. Conséquences sur la digestion et le transit. Annales de Zootechnie 45: 289–298.Google Scholar
Gidenne, T., Pinheiro, V. and Falcao e Cunha, L. 2000. A comprehensive approach of the rabbit digestion: consequences of a reduction in dietary fibre supply. Livestock Production Science 64: 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebas, F., Coudert, P., Rochambeau, H. de and Thébault, R. G. 1996. Le lapin: élevage et pathologie. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Lebas, F. and Lamboley, B. 1999. Méthode de détermination par tamisage en phase liquide de la taille des particules contenues dans un aliment granulé pour lapins. World Rabbit Science 7: 229–235.Google Scholar
Maertens, L. 1992. Rabbit nutrition and feeding: a review of some recent developments. Proceedings of the fifth world rabbit congress, 27-30 July, Corvallis, Oregon. Journal of Applied Rabbit Research 15: 889–913.Google Scholar
Maertens, L. and Groote, G. de. 1985. Influence de la densité d’occupation sur les résultats d’engraissement des lapins de chair. Revue de l’agriculture 38: 463–471.Google Scholar
Maître, I., Lebas, F., Arveux, P., Bourdillon, A., Duperray, J. and Saint Cast, Y. 1990. Taux de lignocellulose (ADF de Van Soest) et performances de croissance du lapin de chair. Proceedings of the 5èmes journées de la recherche cunicoles, 12-13 Déc., Paris, ITAVI Paris, vol. 2, pp. 56·1–56·11.Google Scholar
Nicodemus, N., Carabaño, R., Garcia, J., Mendez, J. and De Blas, J. C. 1999. Performance response of lactating and growing rabbits to dietary lignin content. Animal Feed Science and Technology 80: 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicodemus, N., Garcia, J., Carabaño, R., Mendez, J. and Blas, J. C. de. 1998a. Efecto de la concentracion de lignina en la dieta sobre la digestion en conejos. Proceedings of the XXIII symposium de cunicultura, 24-25 Apr. 1998, Zaragoza. Association Espanola de Cunicultura, pp. 161–164.Google Scholar
Nicodemus, N., Garcia, J., Carabaño, R., Mendez, J. and Blas, J. C. de. 1998b. Efecto de la concentracion de lignina en la dieta sobre la productividad en conejos. Proceedings of the XXIII symposium de cunicultura, 24-25 Apr. 1998, Zaragoza. Association Espanola de Cunicultura, pp. 165–169.Google Scholar
Perez, J. M., Gidenne, T., Bouvarel, I., Arveux, P., Bourdillon, A., Briens, C., Le Naour, J., Messager, B. and Mirabito, L. 1996. Apports de cellulose dans l’alimentation du lapin en croissance. II. Conséquences sur les performances et la mortalité. Annales de Zootechnie 45: 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, J. M., Gidenne, T., Lebas, F., Caudron, I., Arveux, P., Bourdillon, A., Duperray, J. and Messager, B. 1994. Apports de lignines et alimentation du lapin en croissance. II. Conséquences sur les performances de croissance et la mortalité. Annales de Zootechnie 43: 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfost, H. B. 1963. Testing the durability of pelleted feed. Feedstuffs 23: 66–68.Google Scholar
Ridzwan, B. H., Fadzli, M. K., Rozali, M. B. O., Chin, D. T. F., Ibrahim, B. H. and Faridnordin, B. I. 1993. Evaluation of cocoapod husks on performance of rabbits. Animal Feed Science and Technology 40: 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1988. SAS/STAT user’s guide for personnal computers, version 6·03. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Tetlow, R. M. and Wilkins, R. J. 1977. The effect of the density on the intake of dried forage pellets by young ruminants. Animal Production 25: 61–70.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. and Lewis, B. A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–3597.Google Scholar