Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T08:09:09.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of the bovine respiratory bacterial microbiota in health and disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2021

Trevor W. Alexander Open the ORCID record for Trevor W. Alexander [Opens in a new window] ,
Edouard Timsit  and
Samat Amat
Trevor W. Alexander*
Affiliation:
Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
Edouard Timsit
Affiliation:
Ceva Santé Animale, Libourne, France
Samat Amat
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Trevor W. Alexander, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada. E-mail: Trevor.Alexander@Canada.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Increased antimicrobial resistance in bovine respiratory bacterial pathogens poses a threat to the effective control and prevention of bovine respiratory disease (BRD). As part of continued efforts to develop antimicrobial alternatives to mitigate BRD, the microbial community residing within the respiratory tract of feedlot cattle has been increasingly studied using next-generation sequencing technologies. The mucosal surfaces of upper and lower respiratory tracts of cattle are colonized by a diverse and dynamic microbiota encompassing commensal, symbiotic, and pathogenic bacteria. While a direct causal relationship between respiratory microbiota and the development of BRD in feedlot cattle has not been fully elucidated, increasing evidence suggests that the microbiota contributes to respiratory health by providing colonization resistance against pathogens and maintaining homeostasis. Certain management practices such as weaning, transportation, feed transition, and antibiotic application can disrupt the respiratory microbiota, potentially altering pathogen colonization. Microbiota-based approaches, including bacterial therapeutics that target restoring the normal respiratory microbiota, may provide new methods for mitigating BRD in feedlot cattle in place of antibiotics. In addition, the distinct bacterial respiratory microbial communities observed in BRD-affected and healthy feedlot cattle may allow for future application of microbiota-based techniques used in the diagnosis of BRD.

Keywords

Bacterial therapeuticsbovine respiratory diseasecattlediagnosticsrespiratory microbiota
Type
Special issue: Papers from Bovine Respiratory Disease Symposium
Information
Animal Health Research Reviews , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , December 2020 , pp. 168 - 171
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amat, S, Subramanian, S, Timsit, E and Alexander, TW (2017) Probiotic bacteria inhibit the bovine respiratory pathogen Mannheimia haemolytica serotype 1 in vitro. Letters in Applied Microbiology 64, 343–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amat, S, Timsit, E, Baines, D, Yanke, J and Alexander, TW (2019) Development of bacterial therapeutics against the bovine respiratory pathogen Mannheimia haemolytica. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 85, e01359–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amat, S, Alexander, TW, Holman, D, Schwinghamer, T and Timsit, E (2020) Intranasal bacterial therapeutics reduce colonization by the respiratory pathogen Mannheimia haemolytica in dairy calves. mSystems 5, e00629–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anholt, RM, Klima, C, Allan, N, Matheson-Bird, H, Schatz, C, Ajitkumar, P, Otto, SJ, Peters, D, Schmid, K, Olson, M, McAllister, TA and Ralston, B (2017) Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria that cause bovine respiratory disease complex in Alberta, Canada. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 4, 207. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00207CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogaert, D, De Groot, R and Hermans, PW (2004) Streptococcus pneumoniae colonisation: the key to pneumococcal disease. Lancet Infectious Disease 4, 144–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cameron, A and McAllister, TA (2016) Antimicrobial usage and resistance in beef production. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 7, 68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, I and Blaser, MJ (2012) The human microbiome: at the interface of health and disease. Nature Reviews Genetics 13, 260–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Confer, AW (2009) Update on bacterial pathogenesis in BRD. Animal Health Research Reviews 10, 145–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corbeil, LB, Woodward, W, Ward, AC, Mickelsen, WD and Paisley, L (1985) Bacterial interactions in bovine respiratory and reproductive infections. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 21, 803–807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eck, A, de Groot, EFJ, de Meij, TGJ, Welling, M, Savelkoul, PHM and Budding, AE (2017) Robust microbiota-based diagnostics for inflammatory bowel disease. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 55, 1720–1732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaeta, NC, Lima, SF, Teixeira, AG, Ganda, EK, Oikonomou, G, Gregory, L and Bicalho, RC (2017) Deciphering upper respiratory tract microbiota complexity in healthy calves and calves that develop respiratory disease using shotgun metagenomics. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 1445–1458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, JA, Isaiah, A, Estill, CT, Pirelli, GJ and Suchodolski, JS (2017) Weaned beef calves fed selenium-biofortified alfalfa hay have an enriched nasal microbiota compared with healthy controls. PLoS ONE 12, e0179215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodgson, PD, Aich, P, Hokamp, K, Roche, FM, Brinkman, FS, Potter, A, Babiuk, LA and Griebel, PJ (2005) Effect of stress on viral–bacterial synergy in bovine respiratory disease: novel mechanisms to regulate inflammation. Comparative and Functional Genomics 6, 244–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holman, DB, McAllister, TA, Topp, E, Wright, A-D and Alexander, TW (2015a) The nasopharyngeal microbiota of feedlot cattle that develop bovine respiratory disease. Veterinary Microbiology 180, 90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, DB, Timsit, E and Alexander, TW (2015b) The nasopharyngeal microbiota of feedlot cattle. Scientific Reports 5, 15557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, DB, Timsit, E, Amat, S, Abbott, DW, Buret, AG and Alexander, TW (2017) The nasopharyngeal microbiota of beef cattle before and after transport to a feedlot. BMC Microbiology 17, 70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holman, DB, Timsit, E, Booker, CW and Alexander, TW (2018) Injectable antimicrobials in commercial feedlot cattle and their effect on the nasopharyngeal microbiota and antimicrobial resistance. Veterinary Microbiology 214, 140–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holman, DB, Yang, W and Alexander, TW (2019) Antibiotic treatment in feedlot cattle: a longitudinal study of the effect of oxytetracycline and tulathromycin on the fecal and nasopharyngeal microbiota. Microbiome 7, 86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langelier, C, KL, Kalantar, Moazed, F, MR, Wilson, ED, Crawford, Deiss, T, Belzer, A, Bolourchi, S, Caldera, S, Fung, M, Jauregui, A, Malcolm, K, Lyden, A, Khan, L, Vessel, K, Quan, J, Zinter, M, CY, Chiu, ED, Chow, Wilson, J, Miller, S, MA, Matthay, KS, Pollard, Christenson, S, CS, Calfee and JL, DeRisi (2018) Integrating host response and unbiased microbe detection for lower respiratory tract infection diagnosis in critically ill adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 115, E12353–E12362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Man, WH, de Steenhuijsen Piters, WA and Bogaert, D (2017) The microbiota of the respiratory tract: gatekeeper to respiratory health. Nature Reviews Microbiology 15, 259–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMullen, C, Orsel, K, Alexander, TW, van der Meer, F, Plastow, G and Timsit, E (2018) Evolution of the nasopharyngeal bacterial microbiota of beef calves from spring processing to 40 days after feedlot arrival. Veterinary Microbiology 225, 139–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, R and DuPont, HL (2015) New approaches for bacteriotherapy: prebiotics, new-generation probiotics, and synbiotics. Clinical Infectious Diseases 60, S108–S121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettigrew, MM, Laufer, AS, Gent, JF, Kong, Y, Fennie, KP and Metlay, JP (2012) Upper respiratory tract microbial communities, acute otitis media pathogens, and antibiotic use in healthy and sick children. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 78, 6262–6270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Portis, E, Lindeman, C, Johansen, L and Stoltman, G (2012) A ten-year (2000–2009) study of antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria that cause bovine respiratory disease complex – Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, and Histophilus somni in the United States and Canada. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 24, 932–944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raes, J (2016) Microbiome-based companion diagnostics: no longer science fiction. Gut 65, 896–897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stroebel, C, Alexander, TW, Workentine, ML and Timsit, E (2018) Effects of transportation to and co-mingling at an auction market on nasopharyngeal and tracheal bacterial communities of recently weaned beef cattle. Veterinary Microbiology 223, 126–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timsit, E, Workentine, M, Schryvers, AB, Holman, DB, van der Meer, F and Alexander, TW (2016a) Evolution of the nasopharyngeal microbiota of beef cattle from weaning to 40 days after arrival at a feedlot. Veterinary Microbiology 187, 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timsit, E, Holman, DB, Hallewell, J and Alexander, TW (2016b) The nasopharyngeal microbiota in feedlot cattle and its role in respiratory health. Animal Frontiers 6, 44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timsit, E, Hallewell, J, Booker, C, Tison, N, Amat, S and Alexander, TW (2017) Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, and Histophilus somni isolated from the lower respiratory tract of healthy feedlot cattle and those diagnosed with bovine respiratory disease. Veterinary Microbiology 208, 118–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timsit, E, Workentine, M, van der Meer, F and Alexander, TW (2018) Distinct bacterial metacommunities inhabit the upper and lower respiratory tracts of healthy feedlot cattle and those diagnosed with bronchopneumonia. Veterinary Microbiology 221, 105–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeineldin, M, Lowe, J, de Godoy, M, Maradiaga, N, Ramirez, C, Ghanem, M, Abd El-Raof, Y and Aldridge, B (2017a) Disparity in the nasopharyngeal microbiota between healthy cattle on feed, at entry processing and with respiratory disease. Veterinary Microbiology 208, 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeineldin, MM, Lowe, JF, Grimmer, ED, de Godoy, MRC, Ghanem, MM, Abd El-Raof, YM and Aldridge, BM (2017b) Relationship between nasopharyngeal and bronchoalveolar microbial communities in clinically healthy feedlot cattle. BMC Microbiology 17, 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeineldin, M, Lowe, J and Aldridge, B (2019) Contribution of the mucosal microbiota to bovine respiratory health. Trends in Microbiology 27, 753–770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed