Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Genetic and management factors that influence the susceptibility of cattle to Mycobacterium bovis infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Clive J. C. Phillips
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0ES, UK
Charles R. W. Foster
Affiliation:
Mozie Law Veterinary Practice, Canonbie, Dumfrieshire DG14 0RE, UK
Pat A. Morris
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Royal Holloway College, University of London, UK
Rachel Teverson
Affiliation:
Ivycross Farm, Stonehouse, Gloucs GL10 3DH, UK
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Genetic variation in the susceptibility of cattle to Mycobacterium bovis infection exists in differences between families and species, but not breeds. Susceptibility to M. bovis infection increases with age of cattle. Natural exposure to M. bovis or environmental mycobacteria may assist in the development of specific immunity, but there is no direct evidence for such immunological priming of tuberculosis resistance in cattle. This has, however, been demonstrated in humans and other animals. Since non-specific mechanisms have a role in protective immunity, developing an effective vaccine will be difficult, even though some protection of other species has been achieved. Immunological suppression in the periparturient period can produce anergic reactors, which may act as a constant source of infection for cattle-to-cattle transmission. Circumstantial evidence suggests that an adequate intake of mineral, vitamin and protein reduces the susceptibility of cattle. Although weather patterns have been implicated in the susceptibility of herds to M. bovis infection, there is insufficient information to determine the risk factors precisely. It is concluded that some reduction in the susceptibility of cattle to M. bovis infection can be achieved by modifications to the management system to minimize risk factors, but that a considerable amount of further research is required.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © CAB International 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Agranoff, D, Monahan, IM, Mangan, JA, Butcher, PD and Krishna, S (1999) Mycobacterium tuberculosis expresses a novel pH-dependent divalent cation transporter belonging to the Nramp family. Journal of Experimental Medicine 190: 717724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aldwell, FE, Keen, DL, Stent, VC, Thomson, A, Yates, GF, de Lisle, GW and Buddle, BM (1995) Route of BCG administration in possums affects protection against bovine tuberculosis. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 43: 356359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, P, Ljungqvist, L, Haslov, K, Bentzon, MW and Heron, I (1991) Mpb 64 possesses tuberculosis-complex-specific B-cell and T-cell epitopes. International Journal of Leprosy and Other Mycobacterial Diseases 59: 5867.Google Scholar
Barlow, ND, Kean, JM, Hickling, G, Livingstone, PG and Robson, AB (1997) A simulation model for the spread of bovine tuberculosis within New Zealand cattle herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 32: 5775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellamy, R, Beyers, N, McAdam, KP, Ruwende, C, Gie, R, Samaai, P, Bester, D, Meyer, M, Corrah, T, Collin, M, Camidge, DR, Wilkinson, D, Hoal Van Helden, E, Whittle, HC, Amos, W, van Helden, P and Hill, AV (2000) Genetic susceptibility to tuberculosis in Africans: a genome wide scan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97: 80058009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benham, PFJ (1985). A study of cattle and badger behaviour and farm husbandry practices relevant to the transmission of bovine tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis). Reading, UK: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Report to the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Bruning Fann, CS, Schmitt, SM, Fitzgerald, SD, Payeur, JB, Whipple, DL, Cooley, TM, Carlson, T and Friedrich, P (1998) Mycobacterium bovis in coyotes from Michigan. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 34: 632636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchan, GS and Griffin, JFT (1990) Tuberculosis in domesticated deer (Cervus elaphus): a large animal model for human tuberculosis. Journal of Comparative Pathology 103: 1122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchan, GS, Grimmet, DJ and Griffin, JFT (1991) Cervine T-lymphocyte growth factors and their measurement in tuberculosis. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 29: 115126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buddle, BM, Aldwell, FE, Pfeffer, A, Delisle, GW and Corner, LA (1994) Experimental Mycobacterium bovis infection of cattle—effect of dose of M. bovis and pregnancy on immune-responses and distribution of lesions. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 42: 167172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buddle, BM, Skinner, MA and Chambers, MA (2000) Immunological approaches to the control of tuberculosis in wildlife reservoirs. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 74: 116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carmichael, J (1941) Bovine tuberculosis in the tropics with special reference to Uganda. Part 1. Veterinary Journal 97: 329339.Google Scholar
Cassidy, JP, Bryson, DG, Pollock, JM, Evans, RT, Forster, F and Neill, SD (1999) Lesions in cattle exposed to Mycobacterium bovis-inoculated calves. Journal of Comparative Pathology 121: 321337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheeseman, CL, Wilesmith, JW and Stuart, FA (1989) Tuberculosis—the disease and its epidemiology in the badger: a review. Epidemiology and Infection 103: 113125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiy, PC and Phillips, CJC (1993) Sodium fertilizer application to pasture. 4. Effects on mineral uptake and the sodium and potassium status of steers. Grass and Forage Science 48: 260270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, CH (2000) The bovine tubercle bacillus. British Journal of Biomedical Science 57: 234240.Google ScholarPubMed
Collins, MT, Sockett, DC, Goodger, WJ, Conrad, TA, Thomas, CB and Carr, DJ (1994) Herd prevalence and geographic distribution of, and risk-factors for, bovine paratuberculosis in Wisconsin. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 204: 636641.Google ScholarPubMed
Cooney, R, Kazda, J, Quinn, J, Cook, B, Muller, K and Monaghan, M (1997) Environmental mycobacteria in Ireland as a source of non-specific sensitisation to tuberculins. Irish Veterinary Journal 50: 370373.Google Scholar
Corner, LA and Pearson, CW (1979) Response of cattle to inoculation with atypical mycobacteria isolated from soil. Australian Veterinary Journal 55: 69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corner, L, Melville, L, McCubbin, K, Small, KJ, McCormick, S, Wood, PR and Rothel, JS (1990) Efficiency of the inspection procedures for the detection of the tuberculous lesions in cattle. Australian Veterinary Journal 67: 389392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costello, E, Doherty, ML, Monaghan, ML, Quigley, FC and O'Reilly, PF (1998) A study of cattle-to-cattle transmission of Mycobacterium bovis infection. Veterinary Journal 155: 245250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cresswell, WJH (1988) The effects of weather conditions on the movements and activity of badgers (Meles meles) in a suburban environment. Journal of Zoology (London) 216: 187194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dailloux, M, Laurain, C, Weber, R and Hartemann, P (1999) Water and nontuberculous mycobacteria. Water Research 33: 22192228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dannenburg, AM (1991) Delayed-type hypersensitivity and cell-mediated immunity in the pathogenesis of tuberculosis. Immunology Today 12: 228233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lisle, GW, Mackintosh, CG and Bengis, RG (2001). Mycobacterium bovis in free-living and captive wildlife, including farmed deer. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'Office International des Epizooties 20; 86111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donoghue, HD, Overend, E and Stanford, JL (1997) A longitudinal study of environmental mycobacteria on a farm in south-west England. Journal of Applied Microbiology 82: 5767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellwood, DC and Waddington, FG (1972) A second experiment to challenge resistance to tuberculosis in BCG vaccinated cattle in Malawi. British Veterinary Journal 128: 619626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Essey, MA and Koller, MA (1994) Status of bovine tuberculosis in North America. Veterinary Microbiology 40: 1522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fallon, RJ (1994). Effect of cattle enterprise type on the rate of disclosure of tuberculin reactors. Dublin, Ireland: Tuberculosis Investigation Unit, University College, Dublin.Google Scholar
Fallon, RJ and Rogers, PAM (1993). Relationship of herd trace mineral status to the occurrence of tuberculosis. Selected papers 1993. Dublin, Ireland: Tuberculosis Investigation Unit, University College, Dublin.Google Scholar
Fishwick, VC (1952). Dairy Farming Theory and Practice. 7th edn. London: Crosby, Lockwood and Sons.Google Scholar
Francis, J (1947). Bovine Tuberculosis, Including a Contrast with Human Tuberculosis. London: Staples Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J and Clifton-Hadley, RS (2000) Tuberculosis in badgers: a review of the disease and its significance for other animals. Research in Veterinary Science 69: 203217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garner, FH (1946). British Dairying. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Glynn, JR, Warndorff, DK, Malema, SS, Mwinuka, V, Ponnighaus, JM, Crampin, AC and Fine, PE (2000) Tuberculosis: associations with HIV and socioeconomic status in rural Malawi. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 94: 500503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grange, JM (1986) Environmental mycobacteria and BCG vaccination. Tubercle 67: 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grange, JM (1987) Infection and disease due to the environmental mycobacteria. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 81: 179182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grange, JM and Collins, CH (1987) Bovine tubercle bacilli and disease in animals and man. Epidemiology and Infection 99: 221234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffin, JM and Dolan, LA (1995) The role of cattle-to-cattle transmission of Mycobacterium bovis in the epidemiology of tuberculosis in cattle in the Republic of Ireland—a review. Irish Veterinary Journal 48: 228234.Google Scholar
Griffin, JM, Hahesy, T and Lynch, K (1992) The role of farm management practices and environmental factors in chronic tuberculosis. Irish Veterinary Journal 45: 120122.Google Scholar
Griffin, JM, Hahesy, T, Lynch, K, Salman, MD, McCarthy, J and Hurley, T (1993) The association of cattle husbandry practices, environmental factors and farmer characteristics with the occurrence of chronic bovine tuberculosis in dairy herds in the Republic of Ireland. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 17: 145160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, J, Neill, SD and O'Brien, JJ (1992) ELISA tests for antibodies in experimental bovine tuberculosis. Veterinary Microbiology 31: 243249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall-Stoodley, L and LappinScott, H (1998) Biofilm formation by the rapidly growing mycobacterial species Mycobacterium fortuitum. FEMS Microbiology Letters 168: 7784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harboe, M, Wiker, HG, Duncan, JR, Garcia, MM, Dukes, TW, Brooks, BW, Turcotte, C and Nagai, S (1990) Protein G-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for anti-MPB70 antibodies in bovine tuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 28: 913921.Google ScholarPubMed
Iivanainen, E, Sallantaus, T, Katila, ML and Martikainen, PJ (1999) Comparison of some decontamination methods and growth media for isolation of mycobacteria from northern brook waters. Journal of Environmental Quality 28: 12261234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, A, Mukherjee, A, Chattopadhya, D and Saha, K (1995) Biometals in skin and sera of leprosy patients and their correlation to trace-element contents of Mycobacterium leprae and histological types of the disease—a comparative study with cutaneous tuberculosis. International Journal of Leprosy 63: 249258.Google ScholarPubMed
Johnson-Ifearulundu, YJ and Kaneene, JB (1997) Relationship between soil type and Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 210: 17351740.Google ScholarPubMed
Kabrt, J (1962) Report—tuberculosis and the winter feeding of dairy cows. Veterinarstvi. 5052.Google Scholar
Kamala, T, Paramasivan, CN, Herbert, D, Venkatesan, P and Prabhakar, R (1994) Isolation and identification of environmental mycobacteria in the Mycobacterium bovis Bcc trial area of South India. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 60: 21802183.Google Scholar
Kamala, T, Paramasivan, CN, Herbert, D, Venkatesan, P and Prabhakar, R (1996) Immune response and modulation of immune response induced in the guinea-pigs by Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and M. fortuitum complex isolates from different sources in the south Indian BCG trial area. Indian Journal of Medical Research 103: 201211.Google Scholar
Kao, RR, Roberts, MG and Ryan, TJ (1997) A model of bovine tuberculosis control in domesticated cattle herds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences 264: 10691076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kehrli, ME, Kimura, K, Goff, JP, Stabel, JR and Nonnecke, BJ (1998) Periparturient immunosuppression in dairy cows: nutrition and lactation effects. In: Wensing, T (editor). Production Diseases in Farm Animals. Utrecht: Wageningen Pers, pp. 4153.Google Scholar
Keogh, BP (1971) Reviews of the progress of dairy science. Section B. The survival of pathogens in cheese and milk powder. Journal of Dairy Research 38: 91111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, WR, Lamont, HG and McGirr, JL (1949) Further studies on tuberculin sensitivity in the bovine. Veterinary Record 61: 466475.Google Scholar
King, EL, Lovely, DJ and Harris, S (1999) Effect of climate on the survival of Mycobacterium bovis and its transmission to cattle herds in south west Britain. In: Cowan, DP and Feare, CJ (editors). Advances in Vertebrate Pest Management. Furth: Filander Verlag.Google Scholar
Kovalyov, GK (1989) On human tuberculosis due to M. bovis. A review. Journal of Hygiene, Epidemiology, Microbiology and Immunology 33: 199206.Google Scholar
Lepper, AW and Corner, LA (1983) Naturally-occurring mycobacterioses of animals. In: Ratledge, C and Stanford, J (editors). The Biology of the Mycobacteria, Volume 2. Immunological and Environmental Aspects. London: Academic Press: pp. 418521.Google Scholar
Lepper, AW and Wilks, CR (1988) Intracellular iron storage and the pathogenesis of paratuberculosis. Comparative studies with other mycobacterial, parasitic or infectious conditions of veterinary importance. Journal of Comparative Pathology 98: 3153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lepper, AW, Pearson, CW and Corner, LA (1977) Anergy to tuberculin in beef cattle. Australian Veterinary Journal 53: 214216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lepper, AWD, Embury, DH, Anderson, DA and Lewis, VM (1989) Effects of altered dietary iron intake in Mycobacterium paratuberculosis-infected dairy cattle: sequential observations on growth, iron and copper metabolism and development of paratuberculosis. Research in Veterinary Science 46: 289296.Google ScholarPubMed
Lim, T (2000) Human genetic susceptibility to tuberculosis. Annals of the Medical Academy of Singapore 29: 298304.Google ScholarPubMed
LoBue, PA, Cass, R, Lobo, D, Moser, K and Catanzaro, A (1999) Development of housing programs to aid in the treatment of tuberculosis in homeless individuals: a pilot study. Chest 115: 218223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lurie, MR (1941) Heredity, constitution and tuberculosis, an experimental study. American Review of Tuberculosis 44 (Supplement 1), 1125.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, C, Waldrup, K, Labes, R, Buchan, G and Griffin, F (1995) Intra-tonsil inoculation: an experimental model for tuberculosis in deer. In: Griffin, F and de Lisle, G (editors). Tuberculosis in Wildlife and Domesticated Animals. Otago Conference Series, No. 3.Dunedin:University of Otago Press, pp. 121122.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, CG, Qureshi, T, Waldrup, K, Labes, RE, Dodds, KG and Griffin, JFT (2000) Genetic resistance to experimental infection with Mycobacterium bovis in red deer (Cervus elaphus). Infection and Immunity 68: 16201625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddock, ECG (1934) Further studies on the survival time of the bovine tubercle bacillus in soil, soil and dung, in dung and on grass, with experiments on feeding guinea-pigs and calves on grass artificially infected with bovine tubercle bacilli. Journal of Hygiene 34: 372379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mairtin, DO (1994). The effect of enterprise type on the prevalence of tuberculin reactors in the East Offaly badger research project. Selected papers. Dublin, Ireland: Tuberculosis Investigation Unit, University College, Dublin, pp. 1819.Google Scholar
Marangon, S, Martini, M, Dalla Pozza, M and Neto, JF (1998) A case–control study on bovine tuberculosis in the Veneto region (Italy). Preventive Veterinary Medicine 34: 8795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, H and Kenny, MA (1992) Magnesium and immune function: recent findings. Magnesium Research 5: 281293.Google ScholarPubMed
McMurray, DN, Mintzer, CL, Bartow, RA and Parr, RL (1989) Dietary protein deficiency and Mycobacterium bovis BCG affect interleukin-2 activity in experimental pulmonary tuberculosis. Infection and Immunity 57: 26062611.Google ScholarPubMed
Milian-Suazo, F, Salman, MD, Ramirez, C, Payeur, JB, Rhyan, JC and Santillan, M (2000) Identification of tuberculosis in cattle slaughtered in Mexico. American Journal of Veterinary Research 61: 8689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (2000). www.maff.gov.uk/animalh/tb.Google Scholar
Mitserlich, E and Marth, EH (1984). Microbial Survival in the Environment. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monies, RJ and Head, JCS (1999) Bovine tuberculosis in housed calves. Veterinary Record 145. 743.Google ScholarPubMed
Monies, RJ, Cranwell, MP, Palmer, N, Inwald, J, Hewinson, RG and Rule, B (2000) Bovine tuberculosis in domestic cats. Veterinary Record 146: 407408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, RS, Pfeiffer, DU and Jackson, R (1994) The epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis infections. Veterinary Microbiology 40: 153177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mukadi, YD, Maher, D and Harries, A (2001) Tuberculosis case fatality rates in high HIV prevalence populations in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS 15: 143152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Narang, APS, Whig, J, Mahajan, R, Gill, DS, Punia, AK, Goyal, SC and Chawla, LS (1995) Serum copper and zinc levels in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Trace Elements and Electrolytes 12: 7475.Google Scholar
Neill, SD, O'Brien, JJ and Hanna, J (1991) A mathematical model for Mycobacterium bovis excretion from tuberculous cattle. Veterinary Microbiology 28: 103109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neill, SD, Hanna, J, Mackie, DP and Bryson, TG (1992) Isolation of Mycobacterium bovis from the respiratory tracts of skin test-negative cattle. Veterinary Record 131: 4547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neill, SD, Pollock, JM, Bryson, DB and Hanna, J (1994) Pathogenesis of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle. Veterinary Microbiology 40: 4152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neill, SD, Bryson, DG and Pollock, JM (2001) Pathogenesis of tuberculosis in cattle. Tuberculosis 81: 7986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, AM (1999) The cost of disease eradication—smallpox and bovine tuberculosis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 894: 8391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newell, DG and Hewinson, RG (1995) Control of bovine tuberculosis by vaccination. Veterinary Record 136: 459463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orme, IM (1991) Processing and presentation of mycobacterial antigens: implications for the development of a new improved vaccine for tuberculosis control. Tubercle 72: 250252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Reilly, LM and Daborn, CJ (1995) The epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis infections in animals and man: a review. Tubercle and Lung Disease 76 (Supplement 1), 116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pallen, MJ (1984) The immunological and epidemiological significance of environmental mycobacteria on leprosy and tuberculosis control. Tubercle and Lung Disease 76: 146.Google Scholar
Petukhov, VL (1981) [Genetics of cattle resistance to tuberculosis. I. The age of having the disease, milk productivity and the maternal influence on the incidence of the infection in progeny]. [in Russian]. Genetika 17: 729733.Google Scholar
Phillips, CJC (1993). Cattle Behaviour. Ipswich: Farming Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, CJC, Chiy, PC, Arney, DR and Kart, O (2000) Effects of sodium fertilizers and supplements on milk production and mammary gland health. Journal of Dairy Research 67: 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plackett, P, Ripper, J, Corner, LA, Small, K, de Witte, K, Melville, L, Hides, S and Wood, PR (1989) An ELISA for the detection of anergic tuberculous cattle. Australian Veterinary Journal 66: 1519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potgieter, LND, McCracken, MD, Hopkins, FM, Walker, RD and Guy, JS (1984) Experimental production of bovine respiratory tract disease with bovine diarrhoea virus. American Journal of Veterinary Research 45: 15821585.Google Scholar
Ram, T and Sharma, RM (1955) Tuberculosis infection in Haryana Hissar cattle. Indian Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry 25: 99104.Google Scholar
Rhodes, SG, Buddle, BM, Hewinson, RG and Vordermeier, HM (2000) Bovine tuberculosis: immune responses in the peripheral blood and at the site of active disease. Immunology 99: 195202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritacco, V, Lopez, B, De Kantor, IN, Barrera, L, Errico, F and Nader, A (1991) Reciprocal cellular and humoral immune responses. Research in Veterinary Science 50: 365367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schellner, H (1956) Risk of infection in cattle grazing pastures contaminated with tubercle bacilli. Rindertuberkulose 5: 179188.Google Scholar
Schmitt, SM, Fitzgerald, SD, Cooley, TM, Bruning Fann, CS, Sullivan, L, Berry, D, Carlson, T, Minnis, RB, Payeur, JB and Sikarskie, J (1997) Bovine tuberculosis in free-ranging white-tailed deer from Michigan. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 33: 749758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schurr, E, Malo, D, Radzioch, D, Buschman, E, Morgan, K, Gros, P and Skamene, E (1991) Genetic control of innate resistance to mycobacterial infections. Immunology Today 12: A42A45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shield, MJ (1983) The importance of immunologically effective contact with environment mycobacteria. In: Ratledge, C and Stanford, J (editors). The Biology of the Mycobacteria, Volume 2. London: Academic Press, pp. 343415.Google Scholar
Skamene, E (1991) Population and molecular genetics of susceptibility to tuberculosis. Clinical Investigations in Medicine 14: 160166.Google ScholarPubMed
Skinner, MA, Wedlock, DN and Buddle, BM (2001) Vaccination of animals against Mycobacterium bovis. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l';Office International des Epizooties 20: 112132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, F (1905). A Manual of Veterinary Hygiene. London: Baillière: Tindall and Cox.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, DW and Wiegeshaus, EH (1989) What animal models can teach us about the pathogenesis of tuberculosis in humans. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 11 (Supplement 2S), S385S393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soparker, MB (1917) The vitality of the tubercle bacillus outside the body. Indian Journal of Medical Research 4: 627650.Google Scholar
Stanford, JL, Paul, RC, Penketh, A, Thurlow, S, Carswell, JW, Barker, DJP and Barot, S (1976) A preliminary study of the effect of contact with environmental bacteria on the pattern of sensitivity to a range of new tuberculins amongst Ugandan adults. Journal of Hygiene (Cambridge) 76: 205214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Towar, DR (1964) An epidemiologic study of endemic bovine tuberculosis in Marion Township, Michigan. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the United States Animal Health Association 68: 320326.Google ScholarPubMed
Vandenbrink, NW and Ma, WC (1998) Spatial and temporal trends in levels of trace metals and PCBs in the European badger Meles meles (L., 1758) in The Netherlands: implications for reproduction. Science of the Total Environment 222: 107118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waddington, FG and Ellwood, DC (1972) An experiment to challenge the resistance to tuberculosis in B.C.G. vaccinated cattle in Malawi. British Veterinary Journal 128: 541552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whipple, DL, Bolin, CA, Davis, AJ, Jarnagin, JL, Johnson, DC, Nabors, RS, Payeur, JB, Saari, DA, Wilson, AJ and Wolf, MM (1995) Comparison of the sensitivity of the caudal fold skin test and a commercial gamma-interferon assay for diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. American Journal of Veterinary Research 56: 415–9.Google Scholar
Wilesmith, JW, Bode, R, Pritchard, DG, Stuart, FA and Sayers, PE (1986) Tuberculosis in East Sussex. I. Outbreaks of tuberculosis in cattle herds (1964–1984). Journal of Hygiene (Cambridge) 97: 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilesmith, JW and Williams, DR (1986) Tuberculosis lesions in reactor cows [letter]. Veterinary Record 119: 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilesmith, JW and Williams, DR (1987) Observations on the incidence of herds with non-visible lesioned tuberculin test reactors in south-west England. Epidemiology and Infection 99: 173178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, PR, Corner, LA and Plackett, P (1990) Development of a simple, rapid in vitro cellular assay for bovine tuberculosis based on the production of gamma interferon. Research in Veterinary Science 49: 4649.Google ScholarPubMed
Wright, S and Lewis, PA (1921) Factors in the resistance of guinea pigs to tuberculosis with especial regard to inbreeding and heredity. American Naturalist 55: 20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, CHH, TsaiWu, JJ, Huang, YT, Lin, CY, Lioua, GG and Lee, FJS (1998) Identification and subcellular localization of a novel Cu, Zn superoxide dismutase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. FEBS Letters 439: 192196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yapp, WW and Nevens, WB (1944). Dairy cattle, selection, feeding and management. 3rd edn. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 45 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-76cb886bbf-fv2z2 Total loading time: 0.458 Render date: 2021-01-20T07:48:58.453Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Genetic and management factors that influence the susceptibility of cattle to Mycobacterium bovis infection
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Genetic and management factors that influence the susceptibility of cattle to Mycobacterium bovis infection
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Genetic and management factors that influence the susceptibility of cattle to Mycobacterium bovis infection
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *