The human contribution to ambient noise in the ocean has increased over the
past 50 years, and is dominated by low-frequency (LF) sound (frequencies
<1000 Hz) from shipping, oil and gas development, defence-related and
research activities. Mysticete whales, including six endangered species,
may be at risk from this noise pollution because all species produce and
probably perceive low-frequency sound. We conducted a manipulative field
experiment to test the effects of loud, LF noise on foraging fin blue
(B. musculus) and (Balaenoptera physalus) whales off San Nicolas Island,
California. Naive observers used a combination of attached tracking
devices, ship-based surveys, aerial surveys, photo-identification and
passive monitoring of vocal behaviour to examine the behaviour and
distribution of whales when a loud LF source (US Navy SURTASS LFA) was
and was not transmitting. During transmission, 12-30% of the estimated
received levels of LFA of whales in the study area exceeded
140 dB re 1 μPa. However, whales continued to be seen foraging in the
region. Overall, whale encounter rates and diving behaviour appeared to
be more strongly linked to changes in prey abundance associated with
oceanographic parameters than to LF sound transmissions. In some cases,
whale vocal behaviour was significantly different between experimental
and non-experimental periods. However, these differences were not
consistent and did not appear to be related to LF sound transmissions. At
the spatial and temporal scales examined, we found no obvious responses of
whales to a loud, anthropogenic, LF sound. We suggest that the cumulative
effects of anthropogenic LF noise over larger temporal and spatial scales
than examined here may be a more important consideration for management
agencies.