Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T07:47:01.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic variation and resistance to a bacterial infection in the endangered Gila topminnow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2003

Alan R. Giese
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4601, USA
Philip W. Hedrick
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4601, USA
Get access

Abstract

We tested the association between host genetic diversity and resistance to a novel pathogen using controlled experiments to compare bacterially induced mortality among four populations of the endangered Gila topminnow (Poeciliopsis occidentalis) with different levels of genetic diversity, and between nine lines of inbred topminnows and their respective (non-inbred) source populations. We exposed fish in treatment groups to salinity shock and high concentrations of the bacterium Listonella (Vibrio) anguillarum, a causative agent of vibriosis in fish. Mortality associated with vibriosis (mortality) 1 to 6 days post-exposure differed among the populations, and between inbred and non-inbred samples. However, mortality was not associated with expected heterozygosity based on microsatellite loci diversity, nor was it associated with expected or observed heterozygosity at a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II locus. Neither was mortality related to the presence or absence of specific MHC alleles. Additionally, the effect of severe inbreeding was to reduce mortality in the inbred fish relative to the non-inbred controls in every population. Taken in the context of other studies, we conclude that effects of genetic diversity may be context- and locus-specific, environmental stress may be an important determinant of host immunity, and genetic diversity should be used cautiously to predict the potential response of a population to a specific environmental challenge.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)