Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T21:29:17.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Functional Evidence for Lapidary and Carpentry Craft Specialties in the Late Classic of the Central Peten Lakes Region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2008

Mark Aldenderfer
Mark Aldenderfer
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although it has long been clear that craft specialists were present in Late Classic Lowland Maya society, it has proven difficult to identify chipped-stone lithics actually used in craft production. This article outlines a model, based on design theory, that can be used to identify the attributes of tools likely to have been used by lapidary and carpentry craft specialists, and tests it against an assemblage of tools analyzed through microwear analysis from Late Classic assemblages from the central Peten lakes region.

Type
Articles
Information
Ancient Mesoamerica , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , Fall 1991 , pp. 205 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldenderfer, Mark 1981 Computer Simulation for Archaeology: An Introduction. In Simulations in Archaeology, edited by Sabloff, Jeremy, pp.11–49. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Aldenderfer, Mark 1991a Defining Lithics-Using Craft Specialties in Lowland Maya Society through Microwear Analysis: Conceptual Problems and Issues. In The Interpretative Possibilities of Microwear Analysis, edited by Knutsson, Kjel. Aun, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Aldenderfer, Mark 1991b The Structure of Late Classic Lithic Assemblages in the Central Peten Lakes Region, Guatemala. In Stone Tools and Maya Civilization, edited by Hester, Thomas R. and Shafer, Harry. Prehistory Press, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Aldenderfer, Mark, Kimball, Larry, and Sievert, April 1989 Microwear Analysis in the Maya Lowlands: The Use of Functional Data in a Complex Society Setting. Journal of Field Archaeology 16: 47–60.Google Scholar
Wendy, Ashmore (editor) 1981 Lowland Maya Settlement Patterns. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Bamforth, Douglas 1988 Investigating Microwear Polishes with Blind Tests: The Institute Results in Context. Journal of Archaeological Science 15: 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Marshall 1973 Archaeological Evidence for Occupational Specialization among the Classic Period Maya at Tikal, Guatemala. American Antiquity 38: 396–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleed, Peter 1986 The Optimal Design of Hunting Weapons: Maintainability or Reliability. American Antiquity 51: 737–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budnick, Frank, McLeavy, Dennis, and Mojena, Richard 1988 Principles of Operations Research for Management. Irwin Homewood, IL.Google Scholar
Deal, Michael, and Hayden, Brian 1987 The Persistence of Pre-Columbian Lithic Technology. In Lithic Studies among the Contemporary Highland Maya, edited by Hayden, Brian, pp. 235–331. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Greiser, Sally, and Sheets, Payson 1979 Raw Material as a Functional Variable in Use-Wear Studies. In Lithic Use-Wear Studies, edited by Hayden, Brian, pp. 289–296. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hayden, Brian 1987 Past to Present Uses of Stone Tools in the Maya Highlands. In Lithic Studies among the Contemporary Highland Maya, edited by Hayden, Brian, pp. 160–234. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Hayden, Brian, and Cannon, Audrey 1983 Where the Garbage Goes: Refuse Disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2: 117–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillier, Frederick, and Lieberman, Gerald 1980 Introduction to Operations Research, 3d ed.Holden-Day, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Horsfall, Gail 1987 Design Theory and Grinding Stones. In Lithic Studies among the Contemporary Highland Maya, edited by Hayden, Brian, pp. 332–377. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Keeley, Lawrence A. 1980 Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 1982 Rafting and Retooling: Effects on the Archaeological Record. American Antiquity 47: 798–809.Google Scholar
Lewenstein, Suzanne 1987 Stone Tool Uses at Cerros: The Ethnoarchaeological and Usewear Analysis. University of Texas Press, Austin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcomer, Mark, Grace, Roger, and Unger-Hamilton, R. 1986 Investigating Microwear Polishes with Blind Tests. Journal of Archaeological Science 13: 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrofsky, Benjamin 1977 Design, Planning, and Development Methodology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Rice, Don, and Rice, Prudence M. 1980 The Northeast Peten Revisited. American Antiquity 45: 432–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Don, and Rice, Prudence M. 1982 Proyecto Lacustre Project Summary Report: 1979, 1980, and 1981 seasons. Unpublished manuscript, Departments of Anthropology, Universities of Chicago and Florida, Chicago and Gainesville.Google Scholar
Rice, Prudence M. 1987 Economic Change in the Lowland Maya Late Classic Period. In Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies, edited by Brumfiel, E. and Earle, T., pp.76–85. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schele, Linda, and Miller, Mary Ellen 1986 The Blood of Kings. Kimball Art Museum: Fort Worth, TX.Google Scholar
Sievert, April 1990 Maya Ceremonial Specialization: Lithic Tools from the Sacred Cenote at Chichen Itza, Yucatan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University. Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
Stordeur, Daniel 1987 Manches et emmanchements prehistoriques: quelques propositions preliminares. In La main et l'outil: Manches et emmanche ments prehistoriques, edited by Stordeur, Daniel, pp. 11–35. Maison de l'Orient Mediterraneen, Lyon.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. Eric S. 1972 A Commentary on the Dresden Codex. American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Torrence, Robin 1986 Production and Exchange of Stone Tools. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
van, Gijn, Annelou, 1990 The Wear and Tear of Flint. Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 22. Leiden, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Patrick 1987 Positive and Negative Evidence for Hafting on Flint Tools from Various Periods (Magdalenian through Bronze Age). In La main et l'outil: Manches et emmanchements préhistoriques, edited by Stordeur, Daniel, pp. 135–144. Maison de l'Orient Méditer ranéen, Lyon.Google Scholar