Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T16:46:35.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stuttering and Tics in Twins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

U. Godai
Affiliation:
The Gregor Mendel Institute of Medical Genetics and Twin Studies, Rome, Italy Department of Psychiatry, Second Chair, University of Rome, Italy
R. Tatarelli*
Affiliation:
The Gregor Mendel Institute of Medical Genetics and Twin Studies, Rome, Italy Department of Psychiatry, Second Chair, University of Rome, Italy
G. Bonanni
Affiliation:
The Gregor Mendel Institute of Medical Genetics and Twin Studies, Rome, Italy Department of Psychiatry, Second Chair, University of Rome, Italy
*
Istituto Mendel, Piazza Galeno 5, 00161 Roma, Italy

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A total of 63 twin pairs (22 MZ and 41 DZ), with one or both members affected by not organic stuttering and/or tics, have been drawn out of the Mendel Institute's twin file. Concordance of stuttering was observed in 10:12 MZ, but only in 2:19 DZ twin pairs; concordance of tics in 6:10 MZ and in 2:22 DZ twin pairs. Stuttering did not come out significantly associated either with other disturbances of language or with an IQ under the average; almost always it was possible to find out a precipitating factor. Significant relations between stuttering and tics could not be stated. Sex ratio, obtained regarding any affected subject separately, clearly turned in favour of males both in stuttering (32:12) and in tics (27:12). Stutterers and left-handers incidence in the families of stuttering subjects appeared significant in comparison with families of subjects with tics.

Type
9. Science For Twins/Twins For Science
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1976

References

REFERENCES

Ajuriaguerra, de J. 1970. Manuel de Psychiatrie de l'Enfant. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Ascher, E. 1959. Sindromi motorie di origine funzionale o indeterminata. In Arieti, S.: American Handbook of Psychiatry. New York: Basic Books. (Trad, italiana: Bcringhieri 1969).Google Scholar
Bassi, A., Canella, S. 1968. La Balbuzie nell'Età Evolutiva. Firenze: Giunti-Barbera Universitaria.Google Scholar
Berry, M.F. 1938. A common denominator in twinning and stuttering. J. Speech Disorders, 3: 5157.Google Scholar
Coriat, I.H. 1928. Stammering: A Psychoanalytic Interpretation. New York: Nervous and Mental Diseases Publ. Co. Google Scholar
Deutsch, H. 1925. Zur Psychogenese eines Tic Falles. Internat. Zeitschrift für Psychoanalyse, 11: 325332.Google Scholar
Ey, H., Bernard, P., Brisset, C. 1963. Manuel de Psychiatrie. Paris: Masson. (Trad, italiana: Utet-Masson 1972).Google Scholar
Fenichel, O. 1951. Trattato di Psicoanalisi delle Nevrosi e delle Psicosi. Roma: Astrolabio.Google Scholar
Gedda, L. 1951. Studio dei Gemelli. Roma: Orizzonte Medico.Google Scholar
Gerard, M.W. 1947. The psychogenetic in Ego development. In: The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child (Vol. 2, pp. 133162). New York: Internat. Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Landolt, H., Luchsinger, R. 1954. Poltersprache, Stottern und chron. organische Psychosyndrom. Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr., 79: 10131020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luchsinger, R., Arnold, G.E. 1959. Lehrbuch der Stimm- und Spracheilkunde (2 Aufl.). Wien: Springer.Google Scholar
Luchsinger, R. 1960. Die Vererbung der Sprachstörungen. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Moldofsky, H. 1971. A psychophysiological study of multiple tics. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 25: 7887.Google Scholar
Morley, M.E. 1967. The Development and Disorders of Speech in Childhood. Edimburg and London: Livingstone.Google Scholar
Nelson, S.E., Hunter, N., Walter, M. 1945. Cited by Luchsinger and Arnold 1959.Google Scholar
Pescetto, G., Maffei, G. 1969. I Tics. Torino: Minerva Medica.Google Scholar
Pichon, E., Borel-Maisonny, S. 1971. Le Bégayement: Sa Nature et Son Traitement. Peris: Massen.Google Scholar
Rado, S. 1959. La nevrosi ossessiva. In Arieti, S.: American Handbook of Psychiatry. New York: Basir Books. (Trad, italiana: Boringhieri 1969).Google Scholar
Reich, W. 1925. Der Psychogene Tic als Onanie aequivalent. Zeitschrift für sexual Wissenschaft, 11: 302313.Google Scholar
Schepank, H. 1974. Erb-und Umweltfaktoren bei Neurosen. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Schiller, M. 1937. Cited by Gedda 1951.Google Scholar
Schmidt, K. 1940. Cited by Gedda 1951.Google Scholar
Seemann, M. 1937. Die Beteutung der Zwillingpathologie für die Erforschung von Sprachleiden. Arch. n. Stimmenheilk, 1: 8898.Google Scholar
Sheehan, J. 1958. Conflict theory of stuttering. In Eisenson, J. (ed.): Stuttering: A Symposium. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L.S. 1966. Pensiero e Linguaggio. Firenze: Universitaria.Google Scholar
West, R. 1958. An agnostic speculation about stuttering. In Eisenson, J. (ed.): Stuttering: A Symposium. New York: Harper.Google Scholar