Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:39:26.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case Reports of 16 Sets of Conjoined Twins from a Uganda Hospital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

E.Z.N. Zake*
Affiliation:
Obstetrical/Gynecological Unit, Upcountry General Hospital, Mbale, Uganda
*
Head, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mbale Hospital, P.O. Box 65, Mbale, Uganda

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During a 10-year period (1971-1980) 16 sets of conjoined twins were delivered in the author's hospital. The incidence of those twins was 1 in 4242 deliveries, 1 in 69 multiple births, and 1 in 139 congenitally malformed babies. All diagnoses were made during labour or at operation and all babies were lost. There were no maternal deaths.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1984

References

REFERENCES

1.Beelay, L. (1981): Adeverse effects of drugs in the first trimester of pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 8:261272.Google Scholar
2.Doy, JR, Svensen, TG (1978): Conjoined twins. Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol 18:215217.Google Scholar
3.Greenhill, JP, Friedman, EA (1974): Biological Principles and Modern Practice of Obstetrics, 1st Ed. Philadelphia, London. Toronto: WB Saunders Co, p 715729.Google Scholar
4.MacGillivray, I, Nylander, PPS, Corney, G (1975): Human Multiple Reproduction. 1st Ed. London, Philadelphia, Toronto: WB Saunders Co, p 169172.Google Scholar
5.Blerk, Ver, Majerus, TC, Myers, RAM (1980): Teratogenic potential of some psycho-pharmacological drugs: A brief review. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 17:399402.Google Scholar
6.Willison, JR (1961): The Management of Obstetrical Difficulties, 6th Ed. St Louis: The CV Mosby Co, p 637642.Google Scholar
7.Zake, EZN (1982): Uterine rupture during labour in a Ugandan general hospital – Improved prognosis following reorganisation of antenatal care. Singapore J Obstet Gynaecol 13:133136.Google Scholar