Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T14:09:09.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Max Weber and the Ethos of Politics beyond Calculation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2014

SHALINI SATKUNANANDAN
SHALINI SATKUNANANDAN*
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
*
Shalini Satkunanandan is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of California, Davis (ssatkunanandan@ucdavis.edu).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to the prevailing interpretation of “Politics as a Vocation,” the Weberian political leader is willing to leave morality behind and make hard-headed consequentialist calculations about political means. I argue that the Weberian political leader is more accurately described as someone who keeps calculation in its place—both in terms of assessing the consequences of pursuing certain means and, more fundamentally, in terms of a basic framework for viewing responsibility and the world. Indeed, inappropriate substitutions of “calculative” thinking for a broader, more responsive thoughtfulness about the world mark Weber's three paradigms of irresponsible political leadership: the morally absolutist politician, the bureaucratic politician, and the power politician. Further, foregrounding Weber's effort to corral calculation reveals that uncompromising ethical stands in politics need not amount to naïveté or reckless disregard for the consequences, and that morality has a continuing claim on his ideal leader.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 108 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 169 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beetham, David. 1974. Max Weber and the Theory of Modern Politics. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Breiner, Peter. 1989. “Democratic Autonomy, Political Ethics, and Moral Luck.” Political Theory 17 (4): 550–74.Google Scholar
Breiner, Peter. 1996. Max Weber and Democratic Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Eliaeson, Sven. 2000. “Constitutional Caesarism: Weber's Politics in Their German Context.” In The Cambridge Companion to Weber, ed. Turner, Stephen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 131–48.Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond. 2008. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, Harvey. 1992. Politics, Death, and the Devil: Self and Power in Max Weber and Thomas Mann. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1967. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1977. “The Word of Nietzsche: God is Dead.” In The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, trans. Lovitt, William. New York: Harper & Row, 53–114.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. 1993. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jaspers, Karl. 1962. Kant. Ed. Arendt, Hannah and trans. Manheim, Ralph. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Kim, Sung Ho. 2004. Max Weber's Politics of Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 2006. “Liberal Democratic Torture.” British Journal of Political Science 36 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar
Maley, Terry. 2011. Democracy and the Political in Max Weber's Thought. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mantena, Karuna. 2012. “Another Realism: The Politics of Gandhian Nonviolence.” American Political Science Review 106 (2): 455–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Jane. 2009. The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned into a War on American Ideals. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Mehta, Pratap Bhanu. 2001. “The Ethical Irrationality of the World: Weber and Hindu Ethics.” Critical Horizons 2 (2): 203–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mommsen, Wolfgang J. 1974. The Age of Bureaucracy: Perspectives on the Political Sociology of Max Weber. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Wolfgang J. 1984. Max Weber and German Politics, 1890–1920. Trans. Michael S. Steinberg. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1998. On the Genealogy of Morality. Trans. Clark, Maudemarie and Swensen, Alan J.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2002. Beyond Good and Evil. Ed. Horstmann, Rolf-Peter and Norman, Judith and trans. Norman, Judith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O'Donovan, Nick. 2011. “Causes and Consequences: Responsibility in the Political Thought of Max Weber.” Polity 43 (1): 84–105.Google Scholar
Owen, David. 1991. “Autonomy and ‘Inner Distance’: A Trace of Nietzsche in Weber.” History of the Human Sciences 4 (1): 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, David, and Strong, Tracy B. 2004. “Max Weber's Calling to Knowledge and Action.” In Max Weber: The Vocation Lectures, eds. Owen, David and Strong, Tracy B., and trans. Rodney Livingstone. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, ix–lxii.Google Scholar
Palonen, Kari. 1999. “Max Weber's Reconceptualization of Freedom.” Political Theory 27 (4): 523–44.Google Scholar
Plato. 1914. Apology . In Plato, Vol. 1: Euthyphro. Apology. Crito. Phaedo. Phaedrus, trans. Fowler, Harold North. New York: Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
Plato. 1991. The Republic of Plato. Trans. Bloom, Allan. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rosen, Jeffrey. 2007. “Conscience of a Conservative.” New York Times, September 9.Google Scholar
Schluchter, Wolfgang. 1979. “Value Neutrality and the Ethic of Responsibility.” In Max Weber's Vision of History: Ethics and Methods, ed. Roth, Guenther and Schluchter, Wolfgang and trans. Guenther Ross. Berkeley: University of California Press, 65–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schluchter, Wolfgang. 1996. Paradoxes of Modernity. Trans. Neil Solomon. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 2002. The Communitarian Persuasion. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
Starr, Bradley E. 1999. “The Structure of Max Weber's Ethics of Responsibility.” Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (3): 407–34.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1953. Natural Right and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strong, Tracy B. 2012. Politics Without Vision: Thinking Without a Banister in the Twentieth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tenbruck, Friedrich H. 1980. “The Problem of Thematic Unity in the Works of Max Weber.” British Journal of Sociology 31 (3): 316–51.Google Scholar
Turner, Charles. 1992. Modernity and Politics in the Work of Max Weber. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Turner, Stephen. 2000. “Introduction.” In The Cambridge Companion to Weber, ed. Turner, Stephen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villa, Dana. 1999. “Max Weber: Integrity, Disenchantment, and the Illusions of Politics.” Constellations 6 (4): 540–60.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1973. “Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 2 (2): 160–80.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1977. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1964. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Ed. Winckelmann, Johannes. Köln-Berlin: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978a. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Vols. 1 and 2. Ed. Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Clauss and trans. Fischoff et al. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978b. “Parliament and Government in a Reconstructed Germany: A Contribution to the Political Critique of Officialdom and Party Politics.” In Appendix II to Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, Vol 2, ed. Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Clauss and trans. Fischoff et al. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1381–1469.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1946a. “Religious Rejections of the World and their Directions.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, trans. and ed. Gerth, H. H. and Wright Mills, C.. New York: Oxford University Press, 323–59.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1946b. “The Social Psychology of the World Religions.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, trans. and ed. Gerth, H. H. and Wright Mills, C.. New York: Oxford University Press, 267–301.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1975. Roscher and Knies: The Logical Problem of Historical Economics. Trans. Oakes, Guy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1994a. “The Nation State and Economic Policy.” In Weber: Political Writings, eds. Lassman, Peter and Speirs, Ronald. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–28.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1994b. Wissenschaft als Beruf (1917/1919) Politik als Beruf (1919). Ed. Mommsen, Wolfgang J. and Schluchter, Wolfgang with the collaboration of Birgitt Morgenbrod. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1999. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Trans. Parsons, Talcott and intro. Anthony Giddens. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 2004. The Vocation Lectures. Ed. Owen, David and Strong, Tracy B.. Trans. Livingstone, Rodney. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 2012a. “The “Objectivity” of Knowledge in Social Science and Social Policy.” In Max Weber: Collected Methodological Writings, ed. Bruun, Hans Henrik and Whimster, Sam and trans. Hans Henrik Bruun. London: Routledge, 100–38.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 2012b. “The Meaning of ‘Value Freedom’ in the Sociological and Economic Sciences.” In Max Weber: Collected Methodological Writings, ed. Bruun, Hans Henrik and Whimster, Sam and trans. Hans Henrik Bruun. London: Routledge, 304–34.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1978. “Politics and Moral Character.” In Public and Private Morality, ed. Hampshire, Stuart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 55–73.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. [1960] 2004. Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought—Expanded Edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1981. “Max Weber: Legitimation, Method, and the Politics of Theory.” Political Theory 9 (3): 401–24.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. 2000. “Political Theory from Vocation to Invocation.” In Vocations of Political Theory, ed. Frank, Jason A. and Tambornino, John. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 3–22.Google Scholar