Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:34:13.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expectations and Preferences in British General Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Richard Nadeau ,
Richard G. Niemi  and
Timothy Amato
Richard Nadeau
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
Richard G. Niemi
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
Timothy Amato
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We address two questions: How do people form their expectations about the likely winner of the next general election? and What are the links between expectations and votes? Using data collected by the Gallup organization in Great Britain, we find that the expectations formation process (1) has a significant inertia component but also a rapid adjustment to current information; (2) reflects voters' ability to translate economic expectations into political forecasts; and (3) is “time-bounded,” possessing special characteristics immediately before and after a general election. The analysis also confirms the existence of a small bandwagon effect, whereby expectations that one party will win inflate that party's vote. The ability of voters to make reasonable forecasts without being unduly influenced by their own preferences suggests that under normal circumstances voters are expressing real preferences and not simply following the crowd.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 88 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 371 - 383
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., Paolino, Phil, and Rohde, David W.. 1992. “‘Sophisticated Voting’ in the 1988 Presidential Primaries.” American Political Science Review 86:55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. 1986. The Statistical Analysis of Quasi Experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, James E. 1979. The Politics of Economic Decline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 1987. “Candidate Choice and the Dynamics of the Presidential Nominating Process.” American Journal of Political Science 31:1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 1988. Presidential Primaries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel. 1989. “Presidents, the Economy, and Elections: A Principal-Agent Perspective.” In The Presidency in American Politics, ed. Brace, Paul, Harrington, Christine, and King, Gary. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel. 1991. “The Economy and Presidential Approval: An Information Theoretic Perspective.” In Economics and Politics, ed. Norpoth, Helmut, Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Lafay, Jean-Dominique. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Begg, David K. H. 1982. The Rational Expectations Revolution in Macroeconomics: Theories and Evidence. Oxford: Philip Allan.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E., and Johnston, Richard. 1987. “What's the Primary Message: Horse Race or Issue Journalism?” In Media and Momentum, ed. Orren, Gary and Polsby, Nelson. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Butler, David, and Butler, Gareth. 1986. British Political Pads, 1900–1985. Basingtoke: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, David, and Kavanagh, Dennis. 1987. The British General Election of 1987. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Cagan, Philip. 1956. “The Demand for Money in a Hyperin-flationary Economy.” In Studies of the Quantity Theory of Money, ed. Friedman, Milton. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Chappell, Henry, and Keech, William. 1985. “A New View of Political Accountability for Economic Performance.” American Political Science Review 79:10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrystal, Alec, and Peel, David. 1985. “What Can Economists Learn from Political Scientists and Vice Versa?” American Economic Review 76:62–65.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., Mishler, William, and Whiteley, Paul. 1990. “Recapturing the Falklands: Models of Conservative Popularity.” British Journal of Political Science 20:63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., and Stewart, Marianne C.. 1984. “Dealignment of Degree: Partisan Change in Britain, 1974–1983.” Journal of Politics 46:689–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., Stewart, Marianne C., and Zuk, Gary. 1986. “Politics, Economics, and Party Popularity in Britain, 1979–1983.” Electoral Studies 5:123–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, John. 1991. “Comment.” In National Bureau of Economic Research Macroeconomics Annual 1991, ed. Blanchard, Oliver and Fischer, Stanley. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Dunleavey, Patrick, and Husbands, Christopher T.. 1985. British Democracy at the Crossroads. Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Fisher, Franklin M. 1966. The Identification Problem in Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno S., and Schneider, Friedrich. 1978. “A Politico-Economic Model of the United Kingdom.” Economic Journal 88:243–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodhart, C. A. E., and Bhansali, R. J.. 1970. “Political Economy.” Political Studies 18:43–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graetz, Bernard, and McAllister, Ian. 1987. “Party Leaders and Election Outcomes in Britain, 1974–83.” Comparative Political Studies 19:484–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granato, Jim. 1991. “An Agenda for Econometric Model Building.” Political Analysis 3:123–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Edward, and Webster, Charles E. Jr., 1983. Advanced Econometrics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas A. Jr., 1982. “On the Demand for Economic Outcomes: Macroeconomic Performance and Mass Political Support in the United States, Great Britain, and Germany.” Journal of Politics 43:426–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, John. 1982. Inflation: A Theoretical Survey and Synthesis. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Hudson, John. 1985. “The Relationship between Government Popularity and Approval for the Government's Record in the United Kingdom.” British Journal of Political Science 15:165–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Richard, Biais, André, Brady, Henry E., and Crête, Jean. 1992. Letting the People Decide. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelejian, Harry H., and Oates, Wallace E.. 1989. Introduction to Econometrics. 3d ed.New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Rivers, Douglas. 1984. “A Retrospective on Retrospective Voting.” Political Behavior 6:369–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Gerald H. 1983. “The Ecological Fallacy Revisited: Aggregate- Versus Individual-level Findings on Economics and Elections and Sociotropic Voting.” American Political Science Review 77:92–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafay, Jean-Dominique. 1991. “Political Dyarchy and Popularity Functions: Lessons from the 1986 French Experience.” In Economics and Politics, ed. Norpoth, Helmut, Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Lafay, Jean-Dominique. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1980. Applied Regression. Beverly Hills: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Skalaban, Andrew. 1989. “Citizen Forecasting: Can Voters See into the Future?” British Journal of Political Science 19:146–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Robert E. Jr., 1973. “Some International Evidence on Output-Inflation Tradeoffs.” American Economic Review 63:326–34.Google Scholar
McAllister, Ian, and Studiar, Donley T.. 1991. “Bandwagon, Underdog, or Projection? Opinion Polls and Electoral Choice in Britain, 1979–1987.” Journal of Politics 53:720–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1992. “Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy.” American Political Science Review 86:597–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, W. L., and Mackie, M.. 1973. “The Electoral Cycle and the Asymmetry of Government and Opposition Parties.” Political Studies 21:263–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishler, William, Hoskin, Marilyn, and Fitzgerald, Roy. 1989. “British Parties in the Balance: A Time-Series Analysis of Long-Term Trends in Labour and Conservative Support.” British Journal of Political Science 19:211–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosley, Paul. 1984. “Popularity Functions and the Role of the Media: A Pilot Study of the Popular Press.” British Journal of Political Science 14:117–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nerlove, Marc. 1958. The Dynamics of Supply. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Nerlove, Marc, Grether, David, and Carvalho, José. 1979. Analysis of Economic Time Series: A Synthesis. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., Whitten, Guy, and Franklin, Mark. 1992. “Constituency Characteristics, Individual Characteristics, and Tactical Voting in the 1987 British General Election.” British Journal of Political Science 22:229–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut. 1987a. “Guns and Butter and Government Popularity in Britain.” American Political Science Review 81:949–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut. 1987b. “The Falklands War and Government Popularity in Britain: Rally without Consequence or Surge without Decline?” Electoral Studies 6:3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut. 1991. “The Popularity of the Thatcher Government: A Matter of War and Economy.” In Economics and Politics, ed. Norpoth, Helmut, Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Lafay, Jean-Dominique. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Various Years. Main Economic Indicators: Historical Statistics. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Charles, and Smith, Renée. 1993. “Error Correction, Attitude Persistence, and Executive Rewards and Punishments: A Behavioral Theory of Presidential Approval.” Political Analysis 4:127–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagan, Adrian. 1984. “Econometric Issues in the Analysis of Regressions with Generated Regressors.” International Economic Review 25:221–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagan, Adrian. 1986. “Two Stage and Related Estimators and Their Applications.” Review of Economic Studies 53:517–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peffly, Mark. 1984. “The Voter as Juror: Attributing Responsibility for Economic Conditions.” Political Behavior 6:175–94.Google Scholar
Pissarides, C. A. 1980. “British Government Popularity and Economic Performance.” Economic Journal 90:569–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, David, Ward, Hugh, and Marsh, David. 1991. “Macroeconomics, the Falklands War, and the Popularity of the Thatcher Government: A Contrary View.” In Economics and Politics, ed. Norpoth, Helmut, Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Lafay, Jean-Dominique. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sargent, Thomas J., and Wallace, Neil. 1975. “Rational Expectations, the Optimal Monetary Instrument, and the Optimal Money Supply Rule.” Journal of Political Economy 83:241–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, J. Merrill, Miller, Warren E., Brady, Henry E., and Palmquist, Bradley L.. 1985. “Viability, Electability, and Presidential Preference: Initial Results from the 1984 NES Continuous Monitoring Design.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Shaw, G. K. 1983. Rational Expectations: An Elementary Exposition. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
Skalaban, Andrew. 1988. “Do the Polls Affect Elections? Some 1980 Evidence.” Politimi Behavior 10:136–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanos, Aris. 1986. Statistical Foundations of Econometric Modelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar