Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:09:18.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reflections on Fear: Montesquieu in Retrieval

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Corey Robin
Corey Robin*
Affiliation:
Brooklyn College, City University of New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to most scholars, Montesquieu argues that fear threatens a loss of self. Disconnected from the exercise of reason, fear is an emotion that is supposed to prevent the individual from acting with any kind of moral or rational agency. Fear is also premised on the liquidation of civil society; intermediate institutions and plural social structures are destroyed so that despots can act with unmitigated power and violence. I argue that this view does not capture Montesquieu's theory. In my alternative account, fear is intimately connected to our capacity for reason and to our sense of self. It is built on a network of elites, the rule of law, moral education, and the traditional institutions of civil society. I conclude that twentieth-century social science remains too indebted to conventional interpretations of Montesquieu's views, and contemporary theorists would be better served by the alternative analysis proposed here.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 94 , Issue 2 , June 2000 , pp. 347 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Althusser, Louis. 1972. Politics and History: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Hegel, Marx, trans. Brewster, Ben. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1951. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. 1968. Main Currents in Sociological Thought I: Montesquieu, Comte, Marx, Tocqueville, the Sociologists of the Revolution of 1848, trans. Howard, Richard and Weaver, Helen. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Behdad, Ali. 1989. “The Eroticized Orient: Images of the Harem in Montesquieu and His Precursors.” Stanford French Review 12 (Fall/Winter): 109–26.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel, ed. 1963. The Radical Right. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Bennett, David H. 1988. The Party of Fear: From Nativist Movements to the New Right in American History. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1990. “Montesquieu.” In Against the Current: Essays in the History of Ideas, ed. Hardy, Henry. London: Hogarth Press. Pp. 130–61.Google Scholar
Berman, Marshall. 1972. The Politics of Authenticity: Radical Individualism and the Emergence of Modern Society. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Boesche, Roger. 1990. “Fearing Monarchs and Merchants: Montesquieu's Two Theories of Despotism.” Western Political Quarterly 43 (12): 741–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouwsma, William J. 1980. “Anxiety and the Formation of Early Modern Culture.” In After the Reformation: Essays in Honor of J.H. Hexter, ed. Malament, Barbara C.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Pp. 215–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownstein, Ronald. 1994. “America's Anxiety Attack.” Los Angeles Times Magazine (05 18, 1994): 14–37.Google Scholar
Cantril, Hadley. 1940. The Invasion from Mars: A Study in the Psychology of Panic. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean L. and Arato, Andrew. 1992. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Steven F. 1980. Bukharin and the Bolshevik Revolution: A Political Biography, 1888–1938. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohler, Anne M. 1988. Montesquieu's Comparative Politics and the Spirit of American Constitutionalism. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Conquest, Robert. 1968. The Great Terror: Stalin's Purge of the Thirties. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Corradi, Juan E., Fagen, Patricia Weiss, and Garretón, Manuel Antonio, eds. 1992. Fear at the Edge: State Terror and Resistance in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, David Brion. 1960. “Some Themes of Countersubversion: An Analysis of Anti-Masonic, Anti-Catholic, and Anti-Mormon Literature.” Mississippi Valley Historical Review 47 (09): 205–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, David Brion, ed. 1971. The Fear of Conspiracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1995. Democracy on Trial. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish, trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl J., ed. 1954. Totalitarianism. New York: Grosset & Dunlap.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, Carl J., and Brzezinski, Zbigniew. 1965. Totalitarian Dictatorships and Autocracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Getty, J. Arch, and Manning, Roberta T., eds. 1993. Stalinist Terror: New Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, John. 1993. Post-Liberalism: Studies in Political Thought. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hampson, Norman. 1983. Will and Circumstance: Montesquieu, Rousseau, and the French Revolution. London: Gerald Duckworth.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1964. The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hulliung, Mark. 1976. Montesquieu and the Old Regime. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, John, ed. 1988. Civil Society and the State: New European Perspectives. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Keohane, Nannerl O. 1980. Philosophy and the State in France: The Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Jeanne. 1979. “Dictatorships and Double Standards.” Commentary 68 (11): 34–45.Google Scholar
Koebner, R. 1951. “Despot and Despotism: Vicissitudes of a Political Term.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtland Institutes 14: 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koestler, Arthur. 1941. Darkness at Noon. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Kra, Pauline. 1963. “The Invisible Chain of the Lettres persanes.” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 23: 9–60.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Raab, Earl. 1971. The Politics of Unreason: Right-Wing Extremism in America, 1790–1970. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, . [1721] 1961. The Persian Letters, trans. Loy, J. Robert. New York: Meridian.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, . [1748] 1988. The Spirit of the Laws, trans, and ed. Cohler, Anneet al.New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Naphy, William G., and Roberts, Penny, eds. 1997. Fear in Early Modern Society. New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Neumann, Franz. 1957. “Montesquieu.” In The Democratic and Authoritarian State: Essays in Political and Legal Theory, ed. Marcuse, Herbert. New York: Free Press. Pp. 96–148.Google Scholar
Ranum, Orest. 1969. “Personality and Politics in the Persian Letters.” Political Science Quarterly 84 (12): 606–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remnick, David. 1994. Lenin's Tomb: The Last Days of the Soviet Empire. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Richter, Melvin. 1973. “Despotism.” In Dictionary of the History of Ideas, Vol. 2, ed. Wiener, Philip P.. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Richter, Melvin. 1977. The Political Theory of Montesquieu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richter, Melvin. 1995. “Montesquieu's Comparative Analysis of Europe and Asia: Intended and Unintended Consequences.” In L'Europe de Montesquieu. Napoli: Liguori Editore. Pp. 329–48.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Tina. 1991. Children of Cain: Violence and the Violent in Latin America. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Tina. 1995. The Haunted Land: Facing Europe's Ghosts after Communism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Shackleton, Robert. 1961. Montesquieu: A Critical Biography. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shackleton, Robert. 1988. “Asia as Seen by the French Enlightenment.” In Essays on Montesquieu and on the Enlightenment, ed. Gilson, David and Smith, Martin. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation. Pp. 231–41.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1984. Ordinary Vices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1987. Montesquieu. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1989. “The Liberalism of Fear.” In Liberalism and the Moral Life, ed. Rosenblum, Nancy L.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Pp. 21–38.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1995a. “Invoking Civil Society.” In Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Pp. 204–24.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1995b. “Liberal Politics and the Public Sphere.” In New Communitarian Thinking: Persons, Virtues, Institutions, and Communities, ed. Etzioni, Amitai. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia. Pp. 183–217.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. [1835, 1840] 1969. Democracy in America, trans. Lawrence, George. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. On Human Diversity: Nationalism, Racism, and Exoticism in French Thought, trans. Porter, Catherine. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert C., and Cohen, Stephen F., eds. 1965. The Great Purge Trial. New York: Grosset and Dunlap.Google Scholar
Venturi, Franco. 1963. “Oriental Despotism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 24 (01–03): 133–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voltaire, . [1764] 1962. L'A, B, C. In Philosophical Dictionary, vol. 2, trans. Gay, Peter. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. 1989. “Montesquieu and Publius: The Crisis of Reason and The Federalist Papers.” In The Presence of the Past: Essays on the State and the Constitution. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Pp. 100–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, David. 1978. “Montesquieu's View of Despotism and His Use of Travel Literature.” Review of Politics 40 (07): 392–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar