No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Warren v. United States
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 April 2017
Abstract
- Type
- Judicial Decisions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1951
References
1 Jackson and Clark, JJ., dissented on the ground that the injuries were not received “in the service of the ship.” Frankfurter, J., dissented on the ground that the decision of the Court of Appeals that libelant's conduct was a “deliberate act of indiscretion” should not be disturbed.