Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T09:15:32.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vietnam and International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

John H. E. Fried*
Affiliation:
Herbert H. Lehmann College of the City University of New York

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Comments
Copyright
Copyright © The American Society of International Law 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Reprinted in 60 A.J.I.L. 565 (1966).

2 The Memorandum asserts throughout, and four times alone in its first 11 lines that “aggression” (in the form of “armed attack“) occurred against South Viet-Nam prior to the massive intervention of the U. S. in January, 1965 (p. 113).

3 Note 12, referred to in the review, quotes “for example” Ian Brownlie, International Law and the Use of Force by States 273 (1963), and, by express reference, the following authors quoted by Brownlie: Goodrich and Hambro, Nincic, Wehberg, Drost, Skubiszewski, and Sørensen, and the U.N.C.I.O. records.

4 Oppenheim-Lauterpacht, Kelsen, Jessup, Bowett, Stone (see notes 15, 20, 23, 26, 27, 43 and text, pp. 29-31, 37). The group considered it appropriate not to quote writings of its own members, otherwise especially those of Quincy Wright would also have been quoted. The review also overlooks that the term “many international lawyers” implies that some hold different views.