Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T02:39:24.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Universal Jurisdiction: International and Municipal Legal Perspectives. By Luc Reydams. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. Pp. xxvii, 258. Index. $99, £60, cloth; $35, £25, paper.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Kenneth C. Randall
Kenneth C. Randall*
Affiliation:
The University of Alabama School of Law
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Recent Books on International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 98 , Issue 3 , July 2004 , pp. 627 - 631
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kissinger, Henry A., The Pitfalls of Universal Jurisdiction: Risking Judicial Tyranny, Foreign Aff., July/Aug. 2001, at 86 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 The recommendation is available online at <http://www.abanet.org/leadership/2004/recommendations/103a.pdf>. As I was finalizing this review, I became aware of a new collection of essays on the subject—Universal Jurisdiction: National Courts and the Prosecution of Serious Crimes Under International Law (2003), edited by Macedo, Stephen, chair ofthe project that formulated The Princeton Principles on Universal jurisdiction (2001), at <http://www.princeton.edu/~lapa/unive_jur.pdf>Google Scholar. My review ofthe Macedo volume, which will appear in a subsequent issue of the Journal, will give close attention to the recent, significant shift in Belgian law relating to the subject at hand, see Ratner, Steven R., Belgium’s War Crimes Statute: A Postmortem, 97 AJIL 888 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar (editorial comment).

3 S.S. Lotus (Fr./Turk.), 1927 PCIJ (ser. A) No. 10.

4 Traction, Barcelona, Light and Power Co., Second Phase, 1970 ICJ Rep. 5, 64 (Feb. 5) (Fitzmaurice, J., sep. op.)Google Scholar.

5 Attorney General of Israel v. Eichmann, 36 ILR 18 (Isr. Dist. Ct. Jerusalem 1961), affd, 36 ILR 277 (Isr. Sup. Ct. 1962).

6 Reydams examines my article “Universal Jurisdiction Under International Law,” 66 Texas L. Rev. 785 (1988), which, revised, became chapter 8 in my book Federal Courts and the International Human Rights Paradigm (1990). Reydams (compare pp. 38–42 with p. 219) seems to equate my view with the U.S. position. My work focused on civil litigation, however, and did not necessarily advocate for criminal prosecutions in absentia.

7 See, e.g., Belgium’s Top Court Dismisses War-Crimes Case Against U.S. General, Agence France-Presse, Jan. 14, 2004, 2004 WL 63697841. Belgian law pertaining to universaljurisdiction has evolved rapidly over the past few years. See supra note 2.

8 My previous work analyzed the rights and obligations of nonparties to the multilateral conventions. See supra note 6.