Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T16:10:55.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Substantive and Procedural Aspects of International Criminal Law: The Experience of International and National Courts. Edited by Gabrielle Kirk McDonald and Olivia Swaak-Goldman. The Hague, London, Boston: Kluwer Law International, 2000. Vols. 1-2 (vol. 1: pp. xvi, 705, index; vol. 2: pt. 1, pp. xvi, 587; pt. 2, pp. xviii, 2451). $742, €635.50.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Jordan J. Paust*
Affiliation:
University of Houston Law Center

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Recent Books on International Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See vol. 1 of the book under review, Commentary, at 11 n.33 [hereinafter vol. 1].

2 See, e.g., id. at 296, 298; International Committee of the Red Cross [ICRC], Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War: Commentary 421 (Jean S. Pictet gen. ed., 1960); ICRC, Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War 583, 587, 591, 594, 597,602 (JeanS. Pictet gen. ed., 1958); International Criminal Law 32, 821-22, 824-31, 848-49 (M. Cherif Bassiouni ed., 2d ed. 1999).

3 Compare vol. 1 at 78 (two text writers), 79 (state practice), 93 (state practice) ,110 (Aldrich agreeing that they should), with International Criminal Law, supra note 2, at 824, 826, 829-31, and Jordan, J. Paust, Applicability of International Criminal Laws to Events in the Former Yugoslavia, 9 Am. U.J. Int’l L. & Pol. 499, 510-12 & nn.39-42 (1994)Google Scholar.

4 Prosecutor v. Tadić, Opinion and Judgment, No. IT-94-1-T (May 7, 1997); Prosecutor v. Delalić, Judgment, No. IT-96-21-T, (Nov. 16, 1998).

5 See, e.g., International Criminal Law, supra note 2, at 813-14, 816; Paust, supra note 3, at 512-13.

6 Compare vol. 1 at 104 & n.22, 111 (Aldrich claiming that “willfulness, always,... must be proved”), with Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, July 17, 1998, Art. 8(2)(b)(iv),37ILM999 (1998) [hereinafter ICC Statute], and Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts, June 8,1977, Arts. 35(3), 51(5), 1125UNTS3, and Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, Aug. 12, 1949, Art. 147, 6 UST 3516, 75 UNTS 287 (“wantonly”), and International Criminal Law, supra note 2, at 850-53.

7 But see International Criminal Law, supra note 2, at 918,935,948-49,958 (discussing Prosecutor v. Akayesu, Judgment, No. ICTR-96-4-T, para. 520 (Sept. 2, 1998)).

8 But see vol. 1 at 154 n.39, 155, 161, 249-50 (also by Swaak-Goldman).

9 See International Criminal Law, supra note 2, at 866, 905-07, 909.

10 Compare id. at 858-60, 865, 887-89, 891-92 & n.*, 907-08, 915-16.

11 Prosecutor v. Erdemović, Appeals Judgment, No. IT-96-22-A (Oct. 7, 1997).

12 Compare vol. 1 at l66-67 (Swaak-Goldman), withid. at 167 (Li), and 384 (Dinstein).

13 See International Criminal Law, supra note 2, at 123-28.

14 See ICC Statute, supra note 5, Art. 33(1) (c); International Criminal Law, supra note 2, at 100-23.

15 Compare vol. 1 at 386-87, with ICC Statute, supra note 5, Art. 27, and Prosecutor v. Milosević, Decision on Preliminary Motions, No. 99-37-PT, paras. 26-34 (Nov. 8,2001), and International Criminal Law, supra note 2, at 28-33, 38, 79, 132, 136 (discussing French case on nonimmunity for diplomat), 621-22, 746-47.