Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T18:56:16.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

International Litigation and the Quest for Reasonableness: Essays in Private International Law. By Andreas F. Lowenfeld. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press/Clarendon Press, 1996. Pp. xxvii, 239. Index. $65.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (1987).

2 See id. at 237 n.*.

3 Andreas F. Lowenfeld , International Litigation and Arbitration (1993).

4 See Sale v. Haitian Ctrs. Council, Inc., 509 U.S. 155, 173 (1993); Smith v. United States, 507 U.S. 197, 204 (1993); EEOC v. Arabian Am. Oil Co., 499 U.S. 244, 248 (1990); Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp., 488 U.S. 428, 440–41 (1989).

5 See Gary B. Born , International Civil Litigation in United States Courts 576 (3d ed. 1996) (collecting recent lower-court cases).

6 Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. California, 113 S.Ct. 2891 (1993).

7 See Kramer, Larry, Extraterritorial Application of American Law after the Insurance Antitrust Case: A Reply to Professors Lowenfeld and Trimble , 89 AJIL 750 (1995);Google Scholar Andreas F. Lowenfeld, Conflict, Balancing of Interests, and the Exercise of Jurisdiction to Prescribe: Reflections on the Insurance Antitrust Case, 89 AJIL 42 (1995); Phillip R. Trimble, The Supreme Court and International Law: The Demise of Restatement Section 403, 89 AJIL 53 (1995).

8 See, for example, title VII’s extraterritorial provision, 42 U.S.C. §2000e(f) (1994), and the Economic Espionage Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-194, §1837, 110 Stat. 3488 (1996).

9 An excellent overview is Cass Sunstein, Problems with Rules, 83 Cal. L. Rev. 953 (1995).

10 Id. at 1012.

11 For the best discussion of these and other oftignored separation-of-powers considerations in the context of federal extraterritoriality, see Curtis A. Bradley, Territorial Intellectual Property Rights in an Age ofGlobalism, 37 Va. J. Int ’ lL. (forthcoming 1997).