Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

International Lawlessness in Grenada

  • Francis A. Boyle (a1), Abram Chayes (a2), Isaak Dore (a3), Richard Falk (a4), Martin Feinrider (a5), C. Clyde Ferguson (a2), J. David Fine (a6), Keith Nunes (a6) and Burns Weston (a7)...

Extract

The Reagan administration’s arguments purporting to justify the invasion of Grenada under international law must not be allowed to inveigle the American people into supporting this violent intervention into the domestic affairs of another independent state. Throughout the 20th century, the U.S. Government has routinely concocted evanescent threats to the lives and property of U.S. nationals as pretexts to justify armed interventions into sister American states. The transparency of these pretexts was just as obvious then as it is now. The Reagan administration has not established by means of clear and convincing evidence that there did in fact exist an immediate threat to the safety of U.S. citizens in Grenada. Even then, such a threat could have justified only a limited military operation along the lines of the Israeli raid at Entebbe for the sole purpose of evacuating the major concentration of U.S. nationals at the medical college.

Copyright

International Lawlessness in Grenada

  • Francis A. Boyle (a1), Abram Chayes (a2), Isaak Dore (a3), Richard Falk (a4), Martin Feinrider (a5), C. Clyde Ferguson (a2), J. David Fine (a6), Keith Nunes (a6) and Burns Weston (a7)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed