Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T03:44:41.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grimm v. The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 77 , Issue 3 , July 1983 , pp. 649 - 650
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Haji-Bagherpour v. The United States of America, AWD 23-428-2 (Jan. 26, 1983) (Chamber Two).

2 See Harza Engineering Co. v. The Islamic Republic of Iran, AWD 19–98–2 (Dec. 30, 1982) (Chamber Two) (“the phrase ‘expropriations or other measures affecting property rights’ has broad meaning under international law”).

3 The dissent also noted that the majority’s interpretation of “other measures” was not supported by the U.S. pleadings in Haji-Bagherpour, supra note 1, since that case “arose in a different context and the Award of Chamber Two was made without ‘addressing the issue at hand’ in this case.”