Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T17:01:06.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“De Facto” States: Sovereign Immunities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

T. Baty*
Affiliation:
Institut de Droit International and Inner Temple, Barrister-at-Law

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Current Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Vol. 35 (1941), p. 263.

2 That government ie said to have been installed by a Chamber elected by a minority vote, and to have envinced ruthless persecuting activities.

3 The Arantzazu Mendi, L. E., [1939] A. C. 256.

4 The Triheten, (1805) 6 C. Eobinson 65.

5 “The Chevalier d’Almeida [Portuguese Plenipotentiary] is not a professor of the law, but a diplomat; and therefore incompetent to instruct us in questions of law.” Lord Stowell (Sir Wm. Scott) in The Santa Crus, 1 C. Robinson 70.

6 L. R., [1919] P. 95.

7 Ibid. 105.

8 Ibid., [1924] P. 236.

9 Ibid., [1937] 1 Ch. 513.

10 Ibid., [1938] 2 K.B. 176.

11 Ibid., [1938] A.C. 485.

12 61 Lloyd’s List Reports 39.

13 62 Lloyd’s List Reports 7.

14 [1939] P. 178.

15 L. R., [1939] 1 Ch. 182.

16 Ibid., [1939] A.C. 256.

17 (1939) 63 Lloyd’s List Reports 83.

18 Including, of course, its rules of private international law.