Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-31T14:01:02.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Co-Existence Law Bows Out

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1965 

References

1 The record is in process of assembly and will appear as International Law Association, Report of the Fifty-First Conference, Tokyo.

2 For an account of this episode, see John N. Hazard, ‘ ‘ Legal Researeh on ‘ Peaceful Coexistence',” 51 A.J.I.L. 63 (1957).

3 See U.N. Doc. A/5036, Dec. 15, 1961. Report of the Sixth Committee.

4 See Proceedings and Committee Reports of the American Branch of the International Law Association 1963-1964 (New York, 1964) 83-88. Prior reports appear ibid. 1957-1958 (New York, 1958) 85-94, and 1961-1962 (New York, 1962) 72-77.

5 A suggestion as to possible motivation for introduction of the item has been made by Edward McWhinney, “Peaceful Coexistence” and Soviet-Western International Law 32 (Leyden, 1964).

6 The operative provisions of the American and U.S.S.E. Branches’ drafts are set forth in John N. Hazard, “Coexistence Codification Reconsidered,” 57 A.J.I.L. 88 at 92-93 (1963).

7 Soviet Association of International Law, Committee on Peaceful Coexistence, Tokyo Conference (1964). Memorandum on Peaceful Settlement of Territorial Disputes and Frontier Questions. Contributed by S. V. Molodtsov (Moscow, 1964).